Page 1 of 2
Ball St's D vs our O-line.....
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:39 pm
by Falconboy
We had so much trouble keeping BSU's big DT' Tom Kellar from molesting Omar it was ridiculous!
Oh yeah, guess what he's 6'3 and around 300lbs. Flame away if you want, but my points have been more than made. Sad that freaking Ball St. has a 300lb DT but we don't. :shrug:
Oh , why we couldn't put up over 200 yds rushing on BSU is also beyond me. Is O-line still trying to adjust to playing together or what? So much for them being the most athletic they ever been.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:44 pm
by It's the Journey...
ENOUGH!!!!! We are playing the hand we have been dealt. Our lines are what they are and we will have to wait until the offseason to see how much they bulk up for next year. It isn't totally weight anyway. It's all a game of leverage. If we know we are undersized then we have to adjust to be able to get the most leverage we can. I will put my money on a guy who is 6'8" and 250 taking down a guy who is 6'8" and 300 any day of the week if the smaller guy knows where to attack a larger frame. But you just don't seem to understand that at all. When you play poker do you fold unless you have 4 aces and a king?????
Re: Ball St's D vs our O-line.....
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:46 pm
by Tricky_Falcon
falconboy wrote:Flame away if you want, but my points have been more than made.
Ok your points have been made now go away. Are you going to point out after every game we play that someone has a bigger player than us?
Re: Ball St's D vs our O-line.....
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:59 pm
by Falconboy
Tricky_Falcon wrote:falconboy wrote:Flame away if you want, but my points have been more than made.
Ok your points have been made now go away. Are you going to point out after every game we play that someone has a bigger player than us?
No, but I'll actually will say that BSU's O-line was quite small from what I could gather from their roster. We did get some pressure and sacks, but we still let their qb burn us for several deep passes. I do like the play of Mack. He seemed to be quite violent with the pressure and tackling. Maybe he needs to start or at least play alot more.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:21 pm
by FalconFanKM
I just think that we should get some JUCO d lineman who are all about 6-3, 6-4 and weigh about 280-300 lbs...
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:51 pm
by Falconfreak90
BG won the game and Omar put up 428 yards passing, 5 TD's and was sacked ONCE. I think the O line did a solid job as the offense pounded out 554 total yards.
They can keep their 300 lb DT....we have a 1-0 MAC record and sit in 1st in the East.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:58 pm
by Flipper
Let's cut to to the chase...is this fixation about size really just a penis issue that manifesting in a very strange way?
I took abnormal psych and got an A, so I feel qualified to ask.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:06 pm
by Falconfreak90
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:12 pm
by orangeandbrown
Falconfreak90 wrote:
BG won the game and Omar put up 428 yards passing, 5 TD's and was sacked ONCE. I think the O line did a solid job as the offense pounded out 554 total yards.
They can keep their 300 lb DT....we have a 1-0 MAC record and sit in 1st in the East.
Agree on all points. I do think teams are getting more pressure on Omar than they did last year, and I think its because they are selling out the blitz (as Memphis did) as the only way to attack our spread. Omar was sacked only once, but he was hurried a few more times than that.
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:13 pm
by orangeandbrown
Flipper wrote:Let's cut to to the chase...is this fixation about size really just a penis issue that manifesting in a very strange way?
I took abnormal psych and got an A, so I feel qualified to ask.
But did you cheat?
Re: Ball St's D vs our O-line.....
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:28 am
by transfer2BGSU
falconboy wrote:... but we still let their qb burn us for several deep passes.
He is not going to be the last QB that does that to us.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:32 am
by michhiker28
orangeandbrown wrote:Flipper wrote:Let's cut to to the chase...is this fixation about size really just a penis issue that manifesting in a very strange way?
I took abnormal psych and got an A, so I feel qualified to ask.
But did you cheat?
He didn't exactly cheat......he just watered the field a little...lol!
Re: Ball St's D vs our O-line.....
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:03 am
by 1987alum
falconboy wrote:Flame away if you want, but my points have been more than made.
OK, if you insist!
1) As Freak pointed out, despite the presence of a 300-pound DT, Ball State sacked our QB once.
2) Despite the presence of a 300-pound DT, Ball State saw more than 62% of BG's passes completed.
3) As Freak pointed out, despite the presence of a 300-pound DT, Ball State gave up 428 yards passing and 554 yards overall.
4) BG has a 289-pounder that starts at NT (Thaler). Would 11 more pounds make a dramatic difference in his play?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:26 am
by Flipper
I didn't really cheat per se, but having me take abnormal psych is a bit like letting a kid form Paris take French 101...
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 12:56 pm
by truth
Can't we ban really annoying razrousers? This Falconboy is no falcon fan. On the chatroom during the wisconsin game. . had to leave because of him ruining it for everyone.
