SITEMIX
Page 1 of 2

Omar in today's Plain Dealer

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:22 am
by AZZZZ
More From The Plain Dealer | Subscribe To The Plain Dealer
MAC INSIDER
Jacobs waiting for his spotlight
Monday, September 12, 2005
Elton Alexander
Plain Dealer Reporter
OK, let's concede that Vince Young of Texas has forged to the top of the list of challengers to Matt Leinart's Heisman Trophy throne. Let's also say Bowling Green's Omar Jacobs is whispering in Young's ear.

The BG quarterback gets his national TV moment on ESPN Sept. 21 at Boise State. In just two games, suggestions his 41-touchdown, 4,000-yard performance last season were a fluke have been put to rest.

After throwing for five touchdowns against Wisconsin and another five against Ball State, the BG junior is on pace for a 65 TD season, pending a MAC title game and a bowl appearance. He is averaging 443 passing yards per game.

Should Leinart or Young stumble over the course of the season, Jacobs will be on the Heisman watch as well.

http://www.cleveland.com/sports/plainde ... xml&coll=2


----Funny, IF they stumble he will be on the Heisman watch, well turn the page and the PD already has him listed in the PD Heisman watch. Of course he is Elton, didn't you hear the PA guy in Muncie?

More good pub

Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:46 pm
by AZZZZ
http://msn.foxsports.com/cfb/story/4865056

Not sure who the author is but any time we are the lead in an article I'm happy. Google alerts are pretty cool.

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 8:56 am
by Zom
Good find, AZZZ. It's easy to take these 500 yd games for granted, and then you realize half of the rest of the MAC is at it as well. Did somebody say something about PS2 and insanity? Poor D may be a good bedfellow for those looking for a facile argument, but when Garrett Wolfe scoops almost 250 yds between 2 Big 10 games, including Michigan, you have to think Omar isn't the only one doing something right in this conference.

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:20 am
by cowboyjoe
We do take these big offensive numbers for granted. Look at Iowa against Iowa State last week. They were held to 3 points. Look at Temple against Wisconsin last week. Temple never crossed the 50 yard line. What we are doing offensively is unbelievable and should not be taken lightly. I have news for anyone out there. We would put up about 30 on anyone in this country. If we could just get a couple of stops defensively here or there we would be in great shape!

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 10:19 am
by SaxyIrishTenor
I agree that we're spoiled and take our offense for granted a lot, but we can't win the MAC championship on offense alone. Because no matter how many times we put 42 points on the board, it doesn't mean anything if we give up just as many.

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:25 am
by hammb
cowboyjoe wrote:We do take these big offensive numbers for granted. Look at Iowa against Iowa State last week. They were held to 3 points. Look at Temple against Wisconsin last week. Temple never crossed the 50 yard line. What we are doing offensively is unbelievable and should not be taken lightly. I have news for anyone out there. We would put up about 30 on anyone in this country. If we could just get a couple of stops defensively here or there we would be in great shape!
I would bet you any amount of money that we don't put up 30 on a defense such as OSU, LSU, FSU, etc.

Our offense is really good, but we have shown in the past that we do not continue to put up the big numbers against the top notch defenses in college football. That's not a knock, because nobody else puts up that many points on them either, I'm just saying.

For all the love of our offense I'd enjoy our team a heckuva lot more if we were known for keeping all our opponents under 10 points a game, but we struggled to score 20...

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 2:45 pm
by Warthog
Hammb, I agree with your comments, for the most part. But I would add that a reason we wouldn't score that many points is because we tend to play it pretty close to the vest against those teams. Out last trip into Columbus we didn't let loose until the fourth quarter. We tend to run the ball too much also. In my opinion.

Iowa State

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 3:17 pm
by AZZZZ
I watched a bit of the Iowa State game, their offense reminded me a lot of ours but of course their D was more stout. Speaking of stout, I'm thirsty.

azzz(z) I really meant to have 4 z's to match my license plate but somehow I botched the log in a couple of weeks ago. If anybody knows how/if it can be fixed please let me know. And if you see a grey Acura flying by you with a AZZZZ plate give me a honk. Dave

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:23 pm
by cowboyjoe
Hammb.....we put 42 on Wisconsin and could have had more if Sharon catches one late in the game. Wisconsin will suprise everyone this year and probably won't give up more than 24 points in a game the rest of the season. You're crazy if you think we couldn't hang 30 on any top 15 team. Last year Georgia only beat Marshall 10-0 in a game in great weather down at Georgia and we hung over 50 on them in brutal weather. Just stating facts.

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:44 pm
by TG1996
cowboyjoe wrote:Last year Georgia only beat Marshall 10-0 in a game in great weather down at Georgia and we hung over 50 on them in brutal weather. Just stating facts.
I only watched it on TV, but I don't remember the Marshall weather being anything close to "brutal". Might have qualified as "cold", or even "damn cold", but hardly "brutal".

Balls Tate last year was as close to brutal as it got last year, I think.

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2005 10:53 pm
by kdog27
cowboyjoe wrote:Hammb.....we put 42 on Wisconsin and could have had more if Sharon catches one late in the game. Wisconsin will suprise everyone this year and probably won't give up more than 24 points in a game the rest of the season. You're crazy if you think we couldn't hang 30 on any top 15 team. Last year Georgia only beat Marshall 10-0 in a game in great weather down at Georgia and we hung over 50 on them in brutal weather. Just stating facts.
I agree joe. Coming a half yard from scoring 50 in Wisconsin is something that pretty much does not happen. None of those points were off of turnovers either. Wisconsin always has a good defense.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:26 am
by hammb
kdog27 wrote:
cowboyjoe wrote:Hammb.....we put 42 on Wisconsin and could have had more if Sharon catches one late in the game. Wisconsin will suprise everyone this year and probably won't give up more than 24 points in a game the rest of the season. You're crazy if you think we couldn't hang 30 on any top 15 team. Last year Georgia only beat Marshall 10-0 in a game in great weather down at Georgia and we hung over 50 on them in brutal weather. Just stating facts.
I agree joe. Coming a half yard from scoring 50 in Wisconsin is something that pretty much does not happen. None of those points were off of turnovers either. Wisconsin always has a good defense.
Wisconsin has a young defense this year, and are nowhere near the top of college football in that regard.

We have played one of the top defenses in the country each of the last 2 seasons. We put up 17 offensive points against OU last year, and 17 against OSU 2 years ago. Unless you're going to argue that this offense is 13 points better than the past 2 seasons, I don't see where you really have a case...these are facts as well.

Our offense is very good. Not good enough to hang 40+ points on any team in the nation. Nobody's is. Great defense almost always beats great offense. It's a pointless argument anyway, seeing as how our defense would give up 50+ to any of the aforementioned teams.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:54 am
by PGY Tiercel
TG1996 wrote:
cowboyjoe wrote:Last year Georgia only beat Marshall 10-0 in a game in great weather down at Georgia and we hung over 50 on them in brutal weather. Just stating facts.
I only watched it on TV, but I don't remember the Marshall weather being anything close to "brutal". Might have qualified as "cold", or even "damn cold", but hardly "brutal".

Balls Tate last year was as close to brutal as it got last year, I think.
It wasn't any of those things. The weather for the Marshall game, for being in late October early November, was great. Sunny all day, temp was probably in the mid 40s but with the sun on you it was really nice.

The only thing that sucked was having to sit at the Dodge dealership all morning trying to figure out if my car would make it back to lexington the next day instead of tailgating.

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 8:57 am
by cowboyjoe
It is pointless because our defense is not very good right now but the Oklahoma game was Omar's first game w/only 60% of the offense put in place and yes, this year's team is 13 points better than when Josh was running the show in my opinion.

More for the Omar Pub Thread

Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:28 pm
by AZZZZ
Charting the Heisman contenders
By Tony Barnhart | Thursday, September 15, 2005, 03:50 PM

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Just one man’s opinion:

1. Reggie Bush, RB, USC: Off last week. Should have big numbers against Arkansas.

2. Matt Leinart, QB, USC: Ditto.

3. Vince Young, QB, Texas: Count the Ohio State defense among the believers. Threw for 270 yards and ran for 76 more. A 24-yard touchdown pass with 2:37 remaining beat the Buckeyes.

4. Adrian Peterson, RB, Oklahoma: Never got on track in the opener against TCU, but was a one-man band in Oklahoma’s 31-15 win over Tulsa. Peterson ran for 180 of his 220 yards in the second half, when Oklahoma did not throw a pass.

5. Omar Jacobs, QB, Bowling Green: After throwing for 458 yards in the opener with Wisconsin, Jacobs followed it up with 428 yards and five touchdowns in a 40-31 win over Bowling Green.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment |