Ohio still in game with Va Tech.....

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:49 pm

Near end of 2nd half. Wow , Ohio sure must have pretty good defense to still bee in this game 10-0.

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:51 pm

falconboy wrote:Near end of 2nd half. Wow , Ohio sure must have pretty good defense to still bee in this game 10-0.

Yeah, but the key to that team is the zero at the end of that score. You can stop a team 99 times out of 100, but if you can't score, you lose on that one time you don't stop them.

Silly Bobcats, the option is dead!

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:10 pm

Va Tech goes up 17-0. Thought Ohio could hang in there a little longer. :-\

BGSUVA · Post by **BGSUVA** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:41 pm

game is on ESPN classic now

BGSUVA · Post by **BGSUVA** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:42 pm

nevermind, they just switched back

BGSUFootballFan · Post by **BGSUFootballFan** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:45 pm

VaTech running away 24-0, stupid UT cant even cover the spread over Temple for me!!! ND-MSU is the game to watch right now, go irish!

PGY Tiercel · Post by **PGY Tiercel** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 7:55 pm

Wow 45-0, OU really hung in there

I certainly wish we had that OU defense. no way we'd lose with that

Tricky_Falcon · Post by **Tricky_Falcon** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:18 pm

yep people have been quick to jump on the OU bandwagon. Will they be good in a few years? Most likely. Will Frank be around? Probably not.

TG1996 · Post by **TG1996** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 8:21 pm

PGY Tiercel wrote:Wow 45-0, OU really hung in there I certainly wish we had that OU defense. no way we'd lose with that

I'm more worried about Auburn beating Ball State 63-3 I mean, it shows how bad we suck that we couldnt beat ball State at there place by that much and our defense sucks and we cant win and I don't know why we even play anymore.

jerzyboy247 · Post by **jerzyboy247** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:01 pm

We may be giving OU too much credit for this victory over Pitt. Yes it was a good thing that they won and congrats, but does the fact of Pitt having a terrible offense have anything to factor in the OU victory. OU was blasted by VT and keep in mind we were still in the game with UW for a good portion of the game. Yeah and leting the opponents have 45 points is well not a good thing.

BGSUVA · Post by **BGSUVA** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:30 pm

I've been saying that since it first happened. Pitt is not a good team. Beating Pitt would be like beeating East Carolina. No big deal. At least now everyone will shut up about them.

redhawk95 · Post by **redhawk95** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:04 pm

if my math is correct, ohio scored exactly 3 offensive points against pitt and va tech and at least one of their scores against northwestern was a defensive touchdown. they will still be smoked in the conference vs. the bg's, miami's, toledo's, etc.

BGSUFootballFan · Post by **BGSUFootballFan** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 10:13 pm

yes. Ohio is not THAT great. But they are improved and lets not forget Marcus Vick runs a 4.28- 40 and also is a better thrower than Michael

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:35 am

BGSUFootballFan wrote:yes. Ohio is not THAT great. But they are improved and lets not forget Marcus Vick runs a 4.28- 40 and also is a better thrower than Michael

Thats all well and good, but until Marcus can start showing better numbers and stop getting arrested, he still sucks no matter what his name is.

BGSUVA · Post by **BGSUVA** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:09 am

does anyone really believe he runs a 4.28 forty? just because tek says he does, doesn't mean its true. Like meangelo hall, they said he ran a 4.15. go ask any vt fan and they will tell you it isn't true. They have a history of inflating 40 times

Ohio still in game with Va Tech.....

Ohio still in game with Va Tech.....

Re: Ohio still in game with Va Tech.....

Well not anymore.....

Pitt Offense Sucks