Page 1 of 1
wisconsin losing
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:08 pm
by jacojdm
to northwestern...44-34 in the 4th quarter.
edit: it's now 51-34 with under four and half to play.
i wonder who's been holding in this game?
wisconsin lost
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:55 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.
BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:58 pm
by Bleeding Orange
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.
BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
Well, at least our quarterback isn't 38 yrs. old.

Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:08 pm
by Falconboy
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.
BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
Wow!

That was a shock! Didn't see that one coming at all. Is Northwestern for real or is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 10:11 pm
by NYFalcon94
Penn State had to score very late to get by Northwestern and Penn State has looked pretty good this year.
Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 10:28 pm
by goofyeuph
falconboy wrote:is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
This has not been the year to be ranked in the Big Ten, eleven, whatever. The higher ranked team always seems to lose...
Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:41 am
by Schadenfreude
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.
BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
I think Bowling Green and Northwestern are pretty similar teams. I look at those scores against Wisconsin -- and the real difference is that Northwestern got 'em at home and we had to play in Madison.
The way Northern Illinois came within a whisker Northwestern at home makes me even more confident that we are pretty similar.
It will be nice to get Wisconsin in Browns Stadium next year.
Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:36 pm
by kdog27
falconboy wrote:Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.
BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
Wow!

That was a shock! Didn't see that one coming at all. Is Northwestern for real or is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
The Big Ten just beats on itself week in and week out.
Wisconsin cannot defend the spread.
Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:20 pm
by Falconboy
kdog27 wrote:falconboy wrote:Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.
BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
Wow!

That was a shock! Didn't see that one coming at all. Is Northwestern for real or is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
The Big Ten just beats on itself week in and week out.
Wisconsin cannot defend the spread.
Which is obvious ,but how the heck did Northwestern stop Calhoun????

Thats what I'd like to know. It can't be just cuz Wisky was at NW's place. Man , can't wait to face Wisky in Browns Stadium next year!
Re: wisconsin lost
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:26 pm
by Dayons_Den
falconboy wrote:Which is obvious ,but how the heck did Northwestern stop Calhoun????

Thats what I'd like to know.
They didn't stop Calhoun.
Wisconsin’s Brian Calhoun became the first Badger with more than 100 yards rushing and receiving in a game, carrying 23 times for 122 and catching 11 passes for 128 yards.
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:45 pm
by Falconfreak90
Sutton....pure and simple. That kid was awesome at Akron Hoban and now he is tearing up the Big Ten.
There was a writer in the Akron Beacon Journal today saying Sutton would look damn good in an OSU uni.

The thing is, he is a fine student and actually cares about his grades. He chose NW cuz of NW's high standards.
He is one heck of a player.
Factors in a three point loss
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:54 pm
by BigAppleBucky
Start with Wisconsin missing three of its top eight defensive linemen.
Then, for the third year in a row, NW gets a bye week before the UW game.
NW has a great offense. Their big line caused trouble for our linebackers. That's the first time all year that happened.
Add in a couple of important (and clearly wrong) officils' calls and you have an upset.
Problem is, Wisconsin didn't really come out flat in this game. I fear that might happen against Minnesota.
I'd take Jacobs over Basinez any day. But Sutton was good, and he'll be around a few years more.
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:10 pm
by NIUBro
I can still see Hurd falling down in the end zone going for two pts and the win against NW. Ugh!!!! Of course he claims that he was pushed. I doubt it. It was a tough loss.
What a hell of a game it will be if we meet up this year.