SITEMIX
Page 1 of 1

wisconsin losing

Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:08 pm
by jacojdm
to northwestern...44-34 in the 4th quarter.

edit: it's now 51-34 with under four and half to play.
i wonder who's been holding in this game?

wisconsin lost

Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:55 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.


BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:58 pm
by Bleeding Orange
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.


BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
Well, at least our quarterback isn't 38 yrs. old. :P

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:08 pm
by Falconboy
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.


BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.

Wow! :shock: That was a shock! Didn't see that one coming at all. Is Northwestern for real or is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\

Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 10:11 pm
by NYFalcon94
Penn State had to score very late to get by Northwestern and Penn State has looked pretty good this year.

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 10:28 pm
by goofyeuph
falconboy wrote:is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
This has not been the year to be ranked in the Big Ten, eleven, whatever. The higher ranked team always seems to lose...

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:41 am
by Schadenfreude
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.


BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.
I think Bowling Green and Northwestern are pretty similar teams. I look at those scores against Wisconsin -- and the real difference is that Northwestern got 'em at home and we had to play in Madison.

The way Northern Illinois came within a whisker Northwestern at home makes me even more confident that we are pretty similar.

It will be nice to get Wisconsin in Browns Stadium next year.

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:36 pm
by kdog27
falconboy wrote:
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.


BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.

Wow! :shock: That was a shock! Didn't see that one coming at all. Is Northwestern for real or is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
The Big Ten just beats on itself week in and week out.

Wisconsin cannot defend the spread.

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:20 pm
by Falconboy
kdog27 wrote:
falconboy wrote:
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Now it's past tense. 51-48 NW.


BG = NW with a slightly worse defense.

Wow! :shock: That was a shock! Didn't see that one coming at all. Is Northwestern for real or is this just one of those bizzare things that happen in the Big11 from time to time? :-\
The Big Ten just beats on itself week in and week out.

Wisconsin cannot defend the spread.

Which is obvious ,but how the heck did Northwestern stop Calhoun???? :? Thats what I'd like to know. It can't be just cuz Wisky was at NW's place. Man , can't wait to face Wisky in Browns Stadium next year!

Re: wisconsin lost

Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 5:26 pm
by Dayons_Den
falconboy wrote:Which is obvious ,but how the heck did Northwestern stop Calhoun???? :? Thats what I'd like to know.

They didn't stop Calhoun.

Wisconsin’s Brian Calhoun became the first Badger with more than 100 yards rushing and receiving in a game, carrying 23 times for 122 and catching 11 passes for 128 yards.

Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 7:45 pm
by Falconfreak90
Sutton....pure and simple. That kid was awesome at Akron Hoban and now he is tearing up the Big Ten.

There was a writer in the Akron Beacon Journal today saying Sutton would look damn good in an OSU uni. :roll: The thing is, he is a fine student and actually cares about his grades. He chose NW cuz of NW's high standards.

He is one heck of a player.

Factors in a three point loss

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 12:54 pm
by BigAppleBucky
Start with Wisconsin missing three of its top eight defensive linemen.

Then, for the third year in a row, NW gets a bye week before the UW game.

NW has a great offense. Their big line caused trouble for our linebackers. That's the first time all year that happened.

Add in a couple of important (and clearly wrong) officils' calls and you have an upset.

Problem is, Wisconsin didn't really come out flat in this game. I fear that might happen against Minnesota.

I'd take Jacobs over Basinez any day. But Sutton was good, and he'll be around a few years more.

Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:10 pm
by NIUBro
I can still see Hurd falling down in the end zone going for two pts and the win against NW. Ugh!!!! Of course he claims that he was pushed. I doubt it. It was a tough loss.
What a hell of a game it will be if we meet up this year.