Different defensive scheme
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:37 pm
Before the OU game, Solich said that BG had changed its scheme from one that wasn't working against Wisky-Balls Tate-Boise State to something that did work against Temple.
Some here *cough* falconboy *cough* dismissed this, saying what we did differently (I'm paraphrasing here) was play a simply inferior team.
Well, in his post-mortem, Solich again mentioned the new scheme.
From bobcatattack.com: "Derek asked about how the running game didn't get untracked agaisnt BG. Frank said BG controlled the line of scrimage and the change up of scheme that was failing for them early in the year was the key to the Falcons winning this game."
I haven't studied the films, obviously, but I get the sense that there's a lot more movement in the last two games - more stunting from the lineman and linebackers making quicker reads and flying to the ball.
Other observations or thoughts?
Some here *cough* falconboy *cough* dismissed this, saying what we did differently (I'm paraphrasing here) was play a simply inferior team.
Well, in his post-mortem, Solich again mentioned the new scheme.
From bobcatattack.com: "Derek asked about how the running game didn't get untracked agaisnt BG. Frank said BG controlled the line of scrimage and the change up of scheme that was failing for them early in the year was the key to the Falcons winning this game."
I haven't studied the films, obviously, but I get the sense that there's a lot more movement in the last two games - more stunting from the lineman and linebackers making quicker reads and flying to the ball.
Other observations or thoughts?