WED 10am est congressional hearing on BCS
-
MACMAN
WED 10am est congressional hearing on BCS
The WED DEC 10am the Congress of the United States of America will convien to discuss the BCS. You can view the proceedings on CSPAN and ESPN NEWS live.
- PGY Tiercel
- Salmon of Doubt

- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 pm
- Location: Pittsfield township, UofM
- Contact:
Re: WED 10am est congressional hearing on BCS
Alright, more money wasted on "entertainment". When college football actually has a real meaningful impact on my life I might care. I truly don't care if there is a BCS system or a national playoff. Bowl games are fun. Fun to watch. Fun to go to. And I'm sure Fun to play in. The fact that congress thinks this is important, when there are far more important things to be done: Like actually finding a way to safely and effectively end the crap in Iraq, increasing scientific research funding, helping the school systems really educate students (not just passing some test) and many other far more important things, is just a waste of time and money. But then again this is just a club of millionaires, so I'm sure they are just curious to figure out which way will make more money for TV companies and lobbyist, in turn put a little more money in their pockets, and doesn't have a damn thing to do with the actual game of football or college athletics.MACMAN wrote:The WED DEC 10am the Congress of the United States of America will convien to discuss the BCS. You can view the proceedings on CSPAN and ESPN NEWS live.
--nullius in verba--
- Jacobs4Heisman
- a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer

- Posts: 7889
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
- Location: Aliquippa, PA
-
04forheisman
- Fledgling

- Posts: 337
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:20 am
-
MACMAN
So now they continue to test thier multi term serving, 250k a year, voted to pay themselves for life, total lack of effectivnes and no back bone having selfs on colege sports. It will be a reality show...who should we vote off first after having implied term limits and pay reduction to that of avg american and not for life but services rendered.1987alum wrote:This will be a non-event. The intelligence-challenged criminal hacks in Congress have consistently displayed their inability to have an impact on professional sports.
- UK Peregrine
- Transcendent Illuminati

- Posts: 2875
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:48 am
- Location: Grand Valley State University
- Contact:
MACMAN wrote:So now they continue to test thier multi term serving, 250k a year, voted to pay themselves for life, total lack of effectivnes and no back bone having selfs on colege sports. It will be a reality show...who should we vote off first after having implied term limits and pay reduction to that of avg american and not for life but services rendered.
I think you need to be checked for CWD. For the life of me, I can't figure out the above post.
- PGY Tiercel
- Salmon of Doubt

- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 pm
- Location: Pittsfield township, UofM
- Contact:
Try Babelfish. I heard they just installed a Gibberish-to-English translator.UK Peregrine wrote:MACMAN wrote:So now they continue to test thier multi term serving, 250k a year, voted to pay themselves for life, total lack of effectivnes and no back bone having selfs on colege sports. It will be a reality show...who should we vote off first after having implied term limits and pay reduction to that of avg american and not for life but services rendered.![]()
![]()
![]()
I think you need to be checked for CWD. For the life of me, I can't figure out the above post.
--nullius in verba--
- Jacobs4Heisman
- a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer

- Posts: 7889
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
- Location: Aliquippa, PA
PGY Tiercel wrote:Try Babelfish. I heard they just installed a Gibberish-to-English translator.UK Peregrine wrote:MACMAN wrote:So now they continue to test thier multi term serving, 250k a year, voted to pay themselves for life, total lack of effectivnes and no back bone having selfs on colege sports. It will be a reality show...who should we vote off first after having implied term limits and pay reduction to that of avg american and not for life but services rendered.![]()
![]()
![]()
I think you need to be checked for CWD. For the life of me, I can't figure out the above post.
The only meaning I gleaned was that Congressman make 250k a year, which of course isn't true.
Roll Along!
-
Germainfitch1
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:58 pm
Yeah look what they did for steroids in baseball.1987alum wrote:This will be a non-event. The intelligence-challenged criminal hacks in Congress have consistently displayed their inability to have an impact on professional sports.
"Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." --
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
-
Germainfitch1
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:58 pm
Re: WED 10am est congressional hearing on BCS
They are doing it to make sure there is no illegal anti-trust situations going on that are economically illegal. And why do you car if congress is going after the BCS. You should be happy when anyone goes after the BCs. It inherently precludes us from ever being a part of the national football landscape and helps the rich get richer.PGY Tiercel wrote:Alright, more money wasted on "entertainment". When college football actually has a real meaningful impact on my life I might care. I truly don't care if there is a BCS system or a national playoff. Bowl games are fun. Fun to watch. Fun to go to. And I'm sure Fun to play in. The fact that congress thinks this is important, when there are far more important things to be done: Like actually finding a way to safely and effectively end the crap in Iraq, increasing scientific research funding, helping the school systems really educate students (not just passing some test) and many other far more important things, is just a waste of time and money. But then again this is just a club of millionaires, so I'm sure they are just curious to figure out which way will make more money for TV companies and lobbyist, in turn put a little more money in their pockets, and doesn't have a damn thing to do with the actual game of football or college athletics.MACMAN wrote:The WED DEC 10am the Congress of the United States of America will convien to discuss the BCS. You can view the proceedings on CSPAN and ESPN NEWS live.
"Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." --
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
- PGY Tiercel
- Salmon of Doubt

- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 pm
- Location: Pittsfield township, UofM
- Contact:
Re: WED 10am est congressional hearing on BCS
Oh, well that makes sense. I mean, the BCS only started in what 1998. I mean its taken them 7 years to decided whether they should look into anti-trust problems. Isn't this something that they can spot pretty quickly in today's large company mergers. Again, I believe that it really has no impact on how I enjoy BG football games.Germainfitch1 wrote:
They are doing it to make sure there is no illegal anti-trust situations going on that are economically illegal. And why do you car if congress is going after the BCS. You should be happy when anyone goes after the BCs. It inherently precludes us from ever being a part of the national football landscape and helps the rich get richer.
--nullius in verba--
-
Germainfitch1
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:58 pm
Re: WED 10am est congressional hearing on BCS
I was not trying to say our elected officials are competent, but that this would be the reason they would give. Perhaps they see all of the money going around in College athletics and the BCS has not tried to lobby them or given money to their campaigns so now they are going after them.PGY Tiercel wrote:Oh, well that makes sense. I mean, the BCS only started in what 1998. I mean its taken them 7 years to decided whether they should look into anti-trust problems. Isn't this something that they can spot pretty quickly in today's large company mergers. Again, I believe that it really has no impact on how I enjoy BG football games.Germainfitch1 wrote:
They are doing it to make sure there is no illegal anti-trust situations going on that are economically illegal. And why do you car if congress is going after the BCS. You should be happy when anyone goes after the BCs. It inherently precludes us from ever being a part of the national football landscape and helps the rich get richer.
I would have to agree that it is unfair to give out a large amount of money at the end of a season to only a handful of eligible teams determined by vote.
"Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding." --
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
-
MACMAN
Position Jan. 2003 Jan. 2004 Jan. 2005 Legislative Branch Vice President of the United States (President of the Senate) $198,600 $203,000 $208,100 Speaker of the House of Representatives 198,600 203,000 208,100 President Pro Tempore of the Senate 171,900 175,700 180,100 Majority and Minority Leaders — House and Senate 171,900 175,700 180,175
still to high considering the average american is earning just over 60k nationally. More than enough to pay for people care about improving life in america.
still to high considering the average american is earning just over 60k nationally. More than enough to pay for people care about improving life in america.
- Jacobs4Heisman
- a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer

- Posts: 7889
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
- Location: Aliquippa, PA
MACMAN wrote:Position Jan. 2003 Jan. 2004 Jan. 2005 Legislative Branch Vice President of the United States (President of the Senate) $198,600 $203,000 $208,100 Speaker of the House of Representatives 198,600 203,000 208,100 President Pro Tempore of the Senate 171,900 175,700 180,100 Majority and Minority Leaders — House and Senate 171,900 175,700 180,175
still to high considering the average american is earning just over 60k nationally. More than enough to pay for people care about improving life in america.
I don't see anything nearing 250k in there.
Roll Along!
