Danton Cole
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:19 am
Ay-Ziggy-Zoomba.com
Home of Falcon Fans Online!
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/
Danton Cole
https://www.ay-ziggy-zoomba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16051
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:32 am
This wouldn't really surprise me too much. I think everyone knew DC wants a head coaching job, and IMO he'd do a good job as a head guy.
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:21 am
And the "Pooch Sucks" and "Paluch Runs Another Assistant Out" threads will begin in 10...9...8...7...
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:04 am
I'm not going to start any thread but it is weird that there is absolutely no loyalty to Pooch. The first chance anyone gets, their out. Not that you can blame them, I would have been out after the first day.
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:45 am
I wonder if DC knew that Krebs had extended the contract of Coach Paluch.
All of the players that I have talked to really like and respect DC. I wish him all the best, but I hope that he does not get the UAH job.
I want him at BG.
All of the players that I have talked to really like and respect DC. I wish him all the best, but I hope that he does not get the UAH job.
I want him at BG.
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:03 pm
I think its great and I would hope AH would like to draw from our pool quality coaches, those that leave for new opportunities is great. In the end it just speaks to the level of quality coaches we have here and get in the door....now if we paid them more we might be able to hold on to them.
Danton Cole...
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 2:36 pm
Cole was a proven coach before he signed on at BGSU. He undoubtedly did not know that Paluch had a 3-year extension to his contract, so very wisely he's trying to get out before his reputation is trashed.
What would that be, 4 assistants in 3 years, and MACMAN sees no problem out there.
What would that be, 4 assistants in 3 years, and MACMAN sees no problem out there.
Re: Danton Cole...
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:26 pm
bulldog85 wrote:Cole was a proven coach before he signed on at BGSU. He undoubtedly did not know that Paluch had a 3-year extension to his contract, so very wisely he's trying to get out before his reputation is trashed.
What would that be, 4 assistants in 3 years, and MACMAN sees no problem out there.
Looks like MACMAN pointed out the biggest problem...MACMAN wrote:now if we paid them more we might be able to hold on to them.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:49 am
I am excited about seeing who comes in and with this team being set now, and with the super hot goalie coming in who has a more than honest shot at getting the starts ahead of JH, were gona just frinking mop up this year!
macman
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:39 pm
Set Now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's funny, you said that we were set at the beginning of last year to.
And you wonder why everyone knows your a joke.
That's funny, you said that we were set at the beginning of last year to.
And you wonder why everyone knows your a joke.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:05 pm
and everyone also recognizes that if the had stayed healthy the final picture would have been very very very different. but I guess you enjoy being blind, dumb and deaf ...your life is so very easy.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:26 pm
From MACMAN
I am excited about seeing who comes in and with this team being set now, and with the super hot goalie coming in who has a more than honest shot at getting the starts ahead of JH, were gona just frinking mop up this year!
Who is JH ? Jon Horrell
Looks like Unice and Spratt will be two very good starting goalies.
MACMAN I hope that you are correct about us mopping rather than being mopped. This community will not support that kind of performance.
I do not like to spend about $ 100 per victory seen.
I am excited about seeing who comes in and with this team being set now, and with the super hot goalie coming in who has a more than honest shot at getting the starts ahead of JH, were gona just frinking mop up this year!
Who is JH ? Jon Horrell
Looks like Unice and Spratt will be two very good starting goalies.
MACMAN I hope that you are correct about us mopping rather than being mopped. This community will not support that kind of performance.
I do not like to spend about $ 100 per victory seen.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:34 pm
Yeah...I had no idea this thread would turn into this...
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:43 pm
Well, it's nice that is looks like we're going to have two pretty good goalies for next year, but the main problems seem to be what's in front of them.
It's getting redundant, but I don't see how you can blame all last year's problems on injuries. Every team has injuries every year. Some years are worse than others, but injuries are never an excuse. Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think they were ever down to two forward lines and four defensemen. They just skated like that.
It's getting redundant, but I don't see how you can blame all last year's problems on injuries. Every team has injuries every year. Some years are worse than others, but injuries are never an excuse. Maybe I'm wrong but I don't think they were ever down to two forward lines and four defensemen. They just skated like that.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 1:47 pm
Doesn't every thread turn into this???BGDrew wrote:Yeah...I had no idea this thread would turn into this...
