RPI Update 01/21

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:06 pm

Well, our hot start in MAC play has bumped our RPI up to 52. Our game tomorrow against Miami gives us an opportunity to jump up a little more if we win, probably into the top 50, since the skinhawks are the next-best RPI team in the MAC (107). Ohio is holding "strong" at 119, and then there's a whole bunch of crap for the rest of the MAC. There are only 3 other teams that are even under 200.

East:

BG - 52 15-3 (4-0)
MU - 107 10-8 (2-2)
OU - 119 9-8 (2-2)
UB - 174 9-8 (2-2)
UA - 209 5-13 (0-4)
KSU - 240 5-13 (2-2)

West:

BSU - 160 7-10 (3-1)
EMU - 164 9-7 (3-1)
UT - 233 9-7 (2-2)
NIU - 234 5-12 (1-3)
WMU - 237 6-12 (3-1)
CMU - 280 4-13 (0-4)

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:27 pm

Sagarin has us at 43.

http://rpiratings.com/womrate.htm

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:00 pm

As I've said before the rest of the Mac seems to have taken a step or two back while we have either at least stayed relatively the same or moved forward a bit.

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:11 pm

Warthog wrote:Sagarin has us at 43.

http://rpiratings.com/womrate.htm

We get a nice bump in his rankings because he takes scoring margin into account. We've been smoking people in our wins this year, especially on our current win streak.

cowboyjoe · Post by **cowboyjoe** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:14 pm

http://realtimerpi.com/rpi_Men.html

This one has us as 197th--what's the difference in the two sites?

TG1996 · Post by **TG1996** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:23 pm

cowboyjoe wrote:http://realtimerpi.com/rpi_Men.html

This one has us as 197th--what's the difference in the two sites?

That site's for the men, apparently is one difference.

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:07 pm

Oh man that made my day.

In related news, the WOMEN'S team dropped to 80th in the RPI after the 2 losses. We'll need to win the tourney to get to the dance at this point.