SITEMIX
Page 1 of 3

It's time to come to terms.....

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:50 pm
by Rightupinthere
Jackie Motycka > Susie Cassell.


Let's decide this once and for all.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:53 pm
by TG1996
Susie.

But she was more of my generation, so I'm a bit biased.

EDITED TO ADD VISUAL AID:

Image
Jackie Motycka

Image
Susie Cassell

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:09 pm
by SaxyIrishTenor
TG1996 wrote:Susie.

But she was more of my generation, so I'm a bit biased.

EDITED TO ADD VISUAL AID:

Image
Jackie Motycka

Image
Susie Cassell
I don't remember either of them, but that MAN in the picture with Motycka has some serious calf muscle going on.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:19 pm
by ZiggyZoomba
There is no comparison... that's all I need to say. You know my answer.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:31 pm
by Rightupinthere
SaxyIrishTenor wrote: I don't remember either of them, but that MAN in the picture with Motycka has some serious calf muscle going on.
I assure you, her legs were only matched by her mighty fine tuckus.

No comparision, indeed. Jackie.

Besides, you can't argue with 2,122 points with looks to match!

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:34 pm
by Bleeding Orange
That black shoe/white socks combo that Susie is rockin' is a major turn-off. Plus, Jackie clearly has the better legs.

Jackie.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:41 pm
by TG1996
If BO has voted for Jackie, does that mean we're safe to call Susie the winner? :-D


The pic of Susie doesn't really even do her justice, I'd say.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:27 pm
by ZiggyZoomba
Susie....

*sigh*

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:52 pm
by Falcons4Life
Does Stephanie Wenzel not have a place in this convo???

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:38 pm
by bobio
I remember them both. How can you forget? Both nice players and nice to the eyes. However, I gotta go with Jackie both in talent and the looks department. She kinda looks like Farrah in that pic.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:42 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
Falcons4Life wrote:Does Stephanie Wenzel not have a place in this convo???

Ummmmm no.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:52 pm
by ZiggyZoomba
I once had a really long and probably very embarrassing drunken phone conversation with Susie....

*sigh*

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:20 pm
by Jacobs4Heisman
ZiggyZoomba wrote:I once had a really long and probably very embarrassing drunken phone conversation with Susie....

*sigh*

Yeah, but that was weeks ago.

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:58 pm
by The Niz
I'm sorry guys, but Susie and Jackie practically don't even provide good competition for Goldsbury, Thorburne, and Clapper (listed from best to not quite as good as best but still really awesome).

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:30 am
by Rightupinthere
The Niz wrote:I'm sorry guys, but Susie and Jackie practically don't even provide good competition for Goldsbury, Thorburne, and Clapper (listed from best to not quite as good as best but still really awesome).
I'll forgive you for making such an erroneous statement in your first sentence, Niz.

I'll further forgive you for not mentioning Gompers or Taylor. :P