Let me run this by you
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 3:11 pm
So. I have attended OSU and worked there for several years. I am a BG fan without question but it would be foolish for me to ignore the vast differences in the school. What walking around campus always has me asking is what can OSU due to improve. Out in the middle of nowhere and close to a comparable U 15-20 minutes away.
So what has always (probably selfishly) popped in my head is that athletics might be the way to go to. I have read in the past that winning a championship in football or basketball leads to improvements in the number and quality of applicants to a school. I assume, and I have searched with no success, that the same is true for schools like Boise St, Gonzaga and Butler. Face time on the national scale athletically leads to better name and school recognition and then a higher number and quality of applicants. So why not just invest heavily in football and basketball with the goal of a return that would lead to a better overall campus. Increasing enrollment by nearly 1000 this year will certainly be a major boost but I would assume that more enrollees the more graduates the more alumnae giving the more improvements on facilities, the more quality applicnats the more successful alumnae the more almunae giving the more improvements on facilities......You see where I am going. And alumnae will give if they have a connection to the University. Be it academic or athletic.
Those are just my thoughts and I am sure there are some assumptions in there no matter how logical the reasoning may seem to be. Wondered what you thought about it. Why not pay the football coach and mens basketball coach each a million dollars with the expectation of success and overall academic improvement.
I expect some condescending answers but I really would like some thought and input here.
Edit: This is at odds with my hopeful assumptions but it really looks more at BCS schools and is certainly not inclusive enough.
http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09330.pdf
This would support me
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/devin.p ... script.pdf
So what has always (probably selfishly) popped in my head is that athletics might be the way to go to. I have read in the past that winning a championship in football or basketball leads to improvements in the number and quality of applicants to a school. I assume, and I have searched with no success, that the same is true for schools like Boise St, Gonzaga and Butler. Face time on the national scale athletically leads to better name and school recognition and then a higher number and quality of applicants. So why not just invest heavily in football and basketball with the goal of a return that would lead to a better overall campus. Increasing enrollment by nearly 1000 this year will certainly be a major boost but I would assume that more enrollees the more graduates the more alumnae giving the more improvements on facilities, the more quality applicnats the more successful alumnae the more almunae giving the more improvements on facilities......You see where I am going. And alumnae will give if they have a connection to the University. Be it academic or athletic.
Those are just my thoughts and I am sure there are some assumptions in there no matter how logical the reasoning may seem to be. Wondered what you thought about it. Why not pay the football coach and mens basketball coach each a million dollars with the expectation of success and overall academic improvement.
I expect some condescending answers but I really would like some thought and input here.
Edit: This is at odds with my hopeful assumptions but it really looks more at BCS schools and is certainly not inclusive enough.
http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09330.pdf
This would support me
http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/devin.p ... script.pdf