Lady Falcons lose 61-74....

BGSU Women's Basketball!!
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

Post by Falconboy »

Peregrinner wrote:I have to say that even though we lost I still had a great time and really enjoyed the whole experience. Despite the uncomfortable prospect of trying to get a 6'4" body comfortable in a bus seat while trying to sleep, I enjoyed the ride (both there and back).

I honestly don't see how people can be thinking so negatively about this game though. UCLA was a 5 seed, arguably deserved slightly more than that, had a huge size advantage, and were on a hot-streak coming in... so how can people be so down and be knocking our conference play because we lost to them by 13? Our women had stretches where we absolutely dominated them, scoring often and stealing often (especially a big push in the second half), there just weren't enough of them.

I think the fact that we had three players in double-digit scoring and had 12 steals against a 5-seed team is awesome, and only shows that this team is excellent and can only get better.

All that aside, though, I have to say that I am not a fan of anything about UCLA after this experience. Their band's chanting of player names annoyed me (because it stretched on forever), their players were full of attitude, and they played very dirty.. how did Blue get away with all the complaining and bitching she did towards the officials? I saw her running her mouth after every call and pretty much throwing a hissy-fit at one of the officials, but it seemed nothing was said to her by any official, yet we get a technical early in the game...

I'm rooting for Purdue, both because their fans and staff were very kind to me (and our team) and because UCLA has jumped to a high position on my list of unliked teams.

Congratulations to the women on the stellar season, and here's to a bigger and better one next year!
I just looked at our box score of the game I'm still in bewonderment at how we out did them in TO's , we stole the ball from them 12 times, and we only turned the ball over 13 times. 13 TO's against a much faster and quicker team is pretty outstanding as far as I can see. We did very well in that catagory. But unfortuanatly we did nothing to make those stats mean much when we either missed easy bunny layups or when we got our layups blocked. There were a few times that Kate looked to be hammered with no call but usually her laups were just too short and were blocked rather easily by ucla.

We apparently got fouled more than we got called for but we again didn't help our selves there either with a ton of missed FT's. Those were especially frustrating cuz I know we're better than that at the line. UCLA's 6 blocks were the major difference in negating the 21 TO's they had. We could've had 40 steals in the game and it wouldn't have meant jack if we end up gettig all of our fast break shots/layups blocked or just missed. Thats one area where UCLA's superior athletism got us , they easily got back and stuffed our layin attempts. The fact that we still were aggressive even after the many blocks gave us plenty of oppertunities at the line but we just hardly could convert any of them. 10-15 from the line doesn't look really all that bad but surely wasn't enough.

We really made out big time with the location of this game but not so with the opponent. I would rather have taken on a Purdue than UCLA in the 1st Rnd. If we can accomplish whats needed for next year , hopefully we can get a 10 seed or better and not play such a loaded team next time.
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
User avatar
Jacobs4Heisman
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Aliquippa, PA

Post by Jacobs4Heisman »

Rebounding margin is what offset the turnovers, not 6 blocks.

The turnovers gave us more possessions, which we used to miss more shots. That was the difference.

UCLA's crowd consisted of a rude band and cheerleaders, a girl in khaki shorts, a gender-confused bear, a few parents, and 3 Steve and Barry's pleather jackets draped over a railing. Go back to California you damn dirty hippies.
Roll Along!
User avatar
goofyeuph
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:19 pm
Location: Gooding, ID...BGSU in my heart

Post by goofyeuph »

transfer2BGSU wrote:
Falconfreak90 wrote:BTW, how big was the UCLA section? Watching on TV, BG fans (U ROCKED!!) were all we heard!!
They may have had 25 or so on the other side of the arena. Their band was about 20 in size.

One other thing - for a school in California, those were some of the whitest women I have ever seen in my life.
Gio counted 27 not including the band.

Now that you menition it transfer, those were some extremely white women. What happened to the tall tan blonde bombshell I keep dreaming about from California???
TSASOTFMB!!!!
User avatar
Peregrinner
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1937
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:35 pm
Location: Okemos, MI / Bowling Green, OH
Contact:

Post by Peregrinner »

Not gonna lie... as a newly-single, hormonal 20-ish year old, I was more than disappointed by the lack of bombshell cheerleaders.
- Terry S.
- Freddie Falcon 2007-2008
- Class of 2009

The 2nd Annual Alzheimer's Memorial Charity Golf Tournament
To benefit the Alzheimer's Association's Greater Michigan Chapter
July 16, 2011

http://alzheimersmemorial.org
User avatar
goofyeuph
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1696
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 11:19 pm
Location: Gooding, ID...BGSU in my heart

Post by goofyeuph »

Peregrinner wrote:Not gonna lie... as a newly-single, hormonal 20-ish year old, I was more than disappointed by the lack of bombshell cheerleaders.
as a long time single hormonal 22 y/o, I agree!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
TSASOTFMB!!!!
User avatar
svillefalcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1281
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:38 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Post by svillefalcon »

bg_bball wrote:
bgsufalcon24 wrote:.

I'm just a little bit discouraged about the result. If a team that went a perfect 19-0 in the MAC and was arguably one of the best teams in conference history can't win one game in the NCAA tournament, what does that say about our conference? Not much. It's not our fault that our schedule did not provide enough tough competition this year, but its clear that our creampuff schedule did not help us today. It looked like we got flustered when they hit some threes early on, and we weren't as strong to respond once we got behind. I wonder if we would have gotten behind by so much if we had played more tournament-caliber teams this season, I say probably not. Oh well, what are you gonna do? The girls had an awesome season, and its just too bad that it had to end this way.
Sure, the MAC isn't the greatest conference. But you can't put it down b/c we faced a very good UCLA team today. Without such a slow last 10:00 of the 1st half, we are neck-to-neck with a great team. We need to schedule more "quality" teams, and I'm sure Coach Miller knows that. To get these schools to play you, you gotta be a winner.....and we've shown over the past years that we can play with good teams. That's why you're seeing Indy and ND coming here next year, it's just like football...who gets the Wisconsins and Boise's on their schedule now with the recent winning seasons.

i agree, its gonna be awesome to see us beat up on indy again and then cream ND haha

GO FALCONS!
BGSU fan for LIFE!!!!

FEAR THE BIRD!

Image
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

Post by Falconboy »

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Rebounding margin is what offset the turnovers, not 6 blocks.

The turnovers gave us more possessions, which we used to miss more shots. That was the difference.

UCLA's crowd consisted of a rude band and cheerleaders, a girl in khaki shorts, a gender-confused bear, a few parents, and 3 Steve and Barry's pleather jackets draped over a railing. Go back to California you damn dirty hippies.
Yeah forgot , rebounding got us bad too as well. Curt Miller made comments on how he was stuck between a rock and a hard place cuz he was worried about UCLA getting back down the court quickly so he didn't reiterate hard offensive rebounding enough. We probably woulda been screwed both ways, if we went hard to the boards we would probably end up getting called for a lot of over the back fouls or UCLA probably beats us down the court real easy, or we get try to get back on D quickly instead but we lose even bigger margin in rebounginb but get burned by long , long 3's by UCLA's guards like they did.

Like I said before , UCLA was a bad mathchup for us allaround. I hope we get some better Tourney luck next time as long as we dominate the Mac and even better in non-conference like I know we can.
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
Post Reply