Potential Paluch Replacements

MACMAN · Post by **MACMAN** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:45 pm

There are alot of people who are going to being singing him praises and saying...i knew he was good...blagh blagh after this season.

Hes a good coach, a good recruiter and taking this team back up...yea this season sucked, but sometimes you need to hit rock bottom to finsh your climb to the top.

Remember its not his fault the team got so shitty, its Powers fault, the jack ass who keept him around so long.

I am betting life is goning to be real sweet this season. and seasons to come.

The coach hoping deal would be a huge mistake right now and always is, he needs this season and next..then if he still has not done it...maybe, but I doubt it will come to that.

moneymaker02 · Post by **moneymaker02** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:52 pm

ya well we've been saying that about deusche nut dakich the last 3 years, "o well maybe next year"

BGSU Crazy Fan 58 · Post by **BGSU Crazy Fan 58** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:24 am

ZiggyZoomba wrote:Dan Dakich

You took the post right outta my fingertips Grant.

My choice would be Golfer14. Where has he gone away too???

ShaneFalco · Post by **ShaneFalco** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 3:31 am

MACMAN -

Just so you know, credibility around here is based on you spelling ability and your ability to capitalize your sentenses after periods. Just wanted to give you a heads up, because they get pretty upset if you are lacking in either area.

Also, I am asking this question because I do not know the answer, does Paluch have a better record at BG than Powers did? At least a better winning percentage? You seem to be very anti-Powers, so I am guessing that you know the answer.

ShaneFalco · Post by **ShaneFalco** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 3:35 am

MACMAN-

I almost forgot.... nice selection on the gun picture.... that isn't creepy or anything.

Turd Sandwich vs. Giant Doush........ you pick

BGGrad01 · Post by **BGGrad01** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:11 am

ShaneFalco wrote:Also, I am asking this question because I do not know the answer, does Paluch have a better record at BG than Powers did? At least a better winning percentage? You seem to be very anti-Powers, so I am guessing that you know the answer.

Going into last season, Paluch's winning percentage was .391 and Powers ended with a .477 winning percentage. Those were from the media guide prior to last season.

Based on that, I believe that we are left with no other option, but to fire Paluch and hire Urban Meyer, with assistants Jim Larranaga, Keith McLeod, and Rob Blake.

Tricky_Falcon · Post by **Tricky_Falcon** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:13 am

Mike Ditka or Chuck Norris. Honestly I don't see how we could lose with either of these guys.

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:14 am

Tricky_Falcon wrote:Mike Ditka or Chuck Norris. Honestly I don't see how we could lose with either of these guys.

I would pay $100 to see Chuck Norris dropkick Shegos.

pdt1081 · Post by **pdt1081** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:43 am

BGGrad01 wrote: Going into last season, Paluch's winning percentage was .391 and Powers ended with a .477 winning percentage. Those were from the media guide prior to last season.

It would be better to look at season by season comparisons. Buddy had awesome teams his first two years and almost went to the NCAAs.

Dayons_Den · Post by **Dayons_Den** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:55 am

ZiggyZoomba wrote:Dan Dakich

Grant, no WAY! What are you crazy? All of our team would transfer!!! We would be left with nobody to suit up for a game. You orange kool aid drinking loyalists are crazy. Stop being such a university admnistrator!

[embed src="/ayziggyzoomba/<a href="http://wmg.photobucket.com/widgets/BucketStrip.swf" class="postlink">http://wmg.photobucket.com/widgets/BucketStrip.swf" quality="high" bgcolor="ffffff" width="400" height="100" name="BucketStrip" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" flashvars="url=http://wmg.photobucket.com/albums/v617/ ... s/&name=t1"][/embed]

Rightupinthere · Post by **Rightupinthere** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:02 pm

pdt1081 wrote:
BGGrad01 wrote: Going into last season, Paluch's winning percentage was .391 and Powers ended with a .477 winning percentage. Those were from the media guide prior to last season.
It would be better to look at season by season comparisons. Buddy had awesome teams his first two years and almost went to the NCAAs.

Buddy also had a very nicely set table from the York years.

BGDrew · Post by **BGDrew** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 12:36 pm

SaxyIrishTenor wrote:
BGDrew wrote:Falcon Boy.
Falconboy attends less total minutes of hockey than he does of basketball. I'd count total games, but I'm not sure of the last time he made it in at the beginning of either.

Are you sure? He seems to know everything there is to know in the world!

BGFan · Post by **BGFan** » Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:17 pm

ShaneFalco wrote:MACMAN -

Just so you know, credibility around here is based on you spelling ability and your ability to capitalize your sentenses after periods. Just wanted to give you a heads up, because they get pretty upset if you are lacking in either area.

Also, I am asking this question because I do not know the answer, does Paluch have a better record at BG than Powers did? At least a better winning percentage? You seem to be very anti-Powers, so I am guessing that you know the answer.

75% of coaching is recruiting. As was stated earlier, Buddy came in with a LOT of talent already on the team. Paluch, on the other hand, has been working from the ground up which is a much more difficult thing to do. Buddy is a great guy, but the last several years under him were agonizing because we simply did not have much talent on the team.

Last year there was little or no leadership on the ice with a lot of venom coming from those team members who should have been leaders (aka, Buddy's last recruits). This, IMO, lead to the season we ended up with. No real effort from the supposed leaders who were very vocal in their opinions but lousy on the ice made for a long season.

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:20 am

BGFan wrote: No real effort from the supposed leaders who were very vocal in their opinions but lousy on the ice made for a long season.

And this is exactly why we will fare much better this season. We've gotten rid of *perceived potential issues* who were simply taking ice time from the talented players, and now we can see the true talent on our team come to fruition. It is going to be a fun year!

Edited by RUIT.

freddiethefalconBG · Post by **freddiethefalconBG** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:43 am

i dont want to reign on everyone's parade but you guys have to stop living in your fantasy world. guys that were seniors last year were not garbage. not even close. you people just dont understand what this sport is all about. there has been more than enough talent on this team to win over the last four years. the coaches never knew how to make it all come together and work. it is not the players. all the players work their ass off. more than any other team in the conference, especially all that guys that have graduated over the past four years. the talent has been their from the players end it is just not their from the coaches end. sorry but that is the reality. stop kidding yourselves. im a falcon fan for life but i do not lie to myself and say things are great when i know dam well that they are not and never will be under this coaching staff.