Potential Paluch Replacements

bgbill · Post by **bgbill** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:14 pm

It never reigns on parades in my fantasy world.

Falcon Fanatic · Post by **Falcon Fanatic** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:24 pm

bgbill wrote:It never reigns on parades in my fantasy world.

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:34 pm

I wonder what the collective IQ of all of these angry posters is? Someone should start a poll.

McConvey · Post by **McConvey** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:36 pm

Bleeding Orange wrote:I wonder what the collective IQ of all of these angry posters is? Someone should start a poll.

Should we add the numbers together to come up with something not so embarrassing? Afterall, I think 85 is considered only mildly retarded.

FindlayFalcon · Post by **FindlayFalcon** » Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:49 pm

You know what truly scares me? It's the fact that these guys went through at least 3 years of college and probably 4 and still can't spell!!! Deer gahd, that is fritening!!

tnelly7 · Post by **tnelly7** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:15 pm

Ouch, that is a rough statement! Have you ever thought that maybe since the Senior's were not Paluch's recruits, the coaching staff may have treated them a bit different? I don't know, but that may be why the seniors were very outspoken about the program and how much they did not care for the coaching staff! Also, out of the seven seniors, two were goalies and the other three out of the five were on the power play and top guys for us. They may have not been true 'Yzerman' leaders but they definitely gave it their all day in a day out, especially Morrison, who is now on his way to Philadelphia on a AHL contract. These guys gave it their all for four years and they may have not been the best leaders but there had to been other things going on! Once again, we were too damn good last year to finish DEAD LAST!

Falcon Fanatic · Post by **Falcon Fanatic** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:22 pm

tnelly7 wrote: Once again, we were too damn good last year to finish DEAD LAST!

On THAT, we all agree!!

Falcon Fanatic · Post by **Falcon Fanatic** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 2:26 pm

McConvey wrote:
Bleeding Orange wrote:I wonder what the collective IQ of all of these angry posters is? Someone should start a poll.
Should we add the numbers together to come up with something not so embarrassing? Afterall, I think 85 is considered only mildly retarded.

Actually 85 is considered low average. Average IQ is 90 to 110. I am thinking these guys might be closer to 75.... 8)

McConvey · Post by **McConvey** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:14 pm

Falcon Fanatic wrote: Actually 85 is considered low average. Average IQ is 90 to 110. I am thinking these guys might be closer to 75.... 8)

Well when you have an IQ of 220 like me, even people in the 150-200 range seem like imbeciles.

*Sarcasm folks. I don't even know my actual IQ.

ShaneFalco · Post by **ShaneFalco** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:46 pm

I would like to take a poll of your sports IQ, since that is what this message board is all about.

I get a kick out of the fact that many of you think you have all the answers and know everything about hockey, and various aspects that are involved in a team sport. I am venturing to guess that many of you have probably never played a team sport in your lifetime, let alone hockey.

By the way, I do now see any poor punctuation or grammer in any of my posts. Get out your Scott Foresman handbook, and let me know where I have made mistakes.

bgbill · Post by **bgbill** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:40 pm

ShaneFalco wrote: By the way, I do now see any poor punctuation or grammer in any of my posts.

sorry, couldn't resist

ShaneFalco · Post by **ShaneFalco** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:59 pm

Bill, nice work, I am glad you found time to revise my work. That is a spelling error, not punctuation or grammer.

bgbill · Post by **bgbill** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:11 pm

try again

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:12 pm

bgbill wrote:try again

Wow is this going to take more than a Scott/Foresman handbook!

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:44 pm

tnelly7 wrote:Ouch, that is a rough statement! Have you ever thought that maybe since the Senior's were not Paluch's recruits, the coaching staff may have treated them a bit different? I don't know, but that may be why the seniors were very outspoken about the program and how much they did not care for the coaching staff! Also, out of the seven seniors, two were goalies and the other three out of the five were on the power play and top guys for us. They may have not been true 'Yzerman' leaders but they definitely gave it their all day in a day out, especially Morrison, who is now on his way to Philadelphia on a AHL contract. These guys gave it their all for four years and they may have not been the best leaders but there had to been other things going on! Once again, we were too damn good last year to finish DEAD LAST!

Don't think for a second that I actually hold any malice against those players who graduated last year. The sad thing is that when confronted by a bunch of posters who claim to have "inside" knowledge of the team and are spewind some outstanding vitriol, one has very few avenues of confirming the identity of said posters.

It was worth a shot...

Potential Paluch Replacements

Seniors Garbage????

Re: Seniors Garbage????

Re: Seniors Garbage????