BG/UW Predictions

[BGDrew]

May it be a good game with no injuries and good sportsmanship.

With that said, I want to beat the crap out of these guys. Last year was painful to watch and a certain bit of revenge would make the post-game activities more festive and less mourning.

Either way, we're all getting drunk anyways.

[Globetrotter]

Wisconsin 49
BG 21

[Badger8843]

Macman stay off the drugs my friend. UW has won the big 10 in 93, 98, and 99. Also won the Rose Bowl everytime they been in it as well. So you are way off on that, on top of that the last 2 years people have picked us to finish in the bottom of the big 10. However we have finished in the top 3 both years.
Also someone stated that the 2003 BG would have beat are ase all over the field. Ok for one is I hate these arguements because they will never get solved. For 2 that was the same year we snapped OSU's huge win streak so I doubt if you would have beaten us all over the field.
Now on to the niz, no one cares if you have any respect for Wisconsin but you are totally wrong in saying that big 10 doesn't have any, when you hear tressel always talk about how he likes the way UW plays football and the coaches in the big 10 always respected Barry Alvarez. Respect us or not we will win Saturday and it's not going to be close. So then you can say well Wisconsin beat are ase for the 2nd year in a row but I still don't respect them. When you say Wisconsin you've said it all.

[Rightupinthere]

Either way, we're all getting drunk anyways.

You always have a way of extending the olive branch, Drew.

[MACMAN]

Lets see the "power house" WI won the big 10 last time in 1999, then beofre that it was ....WAYYYYYYYY back...are you tired yet..it long a long trip in the way back Machine to 1962. These guys are no better than a purdue, or NW in all reality. They have 0 big ten respect ...

Big Ten Conference and Rose Bowl Champions: 1994 and 1999 and 2000.

It's always best to do your home work first!

* Year Champion

* 1896 University of Wisconsin
* 1897 Wisconsin
* 1898 University of Michigan
* 1899 University of Chicago
* 1900 University of Iowa and University of Minnesota
* 1901 Michigan and Wisconsin
* 1902 Michigan
* 1903 Michigan, Minnesota and Northwestern University
* 1904 Michigan and Minnesota
* 1905 Chicago
* 1906 Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin
* 1907 Chicago
* 1908 Chicago
* 1909 Minnesota
* 1910 University of Illinois and Minnesota
* 1911 Minnesota
* 1912 Wisconsin
* 1913 Chicago
* 1914 Illinois
* 1915 Illinois and Minnesota
* 1916 Ohio State University
* 1917 Ohio State
* 1918 Illinois, Michigan and Purdue University
* 1919 Illinois
* 1920 Ohio State
* 1921 Iowa
* 1922 Iowa and Michigan
* 1923 Illinois and Michigan
* 1924 Chicago
* 1925 Michigan
* 1926 Michigan and Northwestern
* 1927 Illinois and Minnesota
* 1928 Illinois
* 1929 Purdue
* 1930 Michigan and Northwestern
* 1931 Michigan, Northwestern and Purdue
* 1932 Michigan
* 1933 Michigan and Minnesota
* 1934 Minnesota
* 1935 Minnesota and Ohio State
* 1936 Northwestern
* 1937 Minnesota
* 1938 Minnesota
* 1939 Ohio State
* 1940 Minnesota
* 1941 Minnesota
* 1942 Ohio State
* 1943 Michigan and Purdue
* 1944 Ohio State
* 1945 Indiana University
* 1946 Illinois
* 1947 Michigan
* 1948 Michigan
* 1949 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1950 Michigan
* 1951 Illinois
* 1952 Purdue and Wisconsin
* 1953 Illinois and Michigan State University
* 1954 Ohio State
* 1955 Ohio State
* 1956 Iowa
* 1957 Ohio State
* 1958 Iowa
* 1959 Wisconsin
* 1960 Iowa and Minnesota
* 1961 Ohio State
* 1962 Wisconsin
* 1963 Illinois
* 1964 Michigan
* 1965 Michigan State
* 1966 Michigan State
* 1967 Indiana, Minnesota and Purdue
* 1968 Ohio State
* 1969 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1970 Ohio State
* 1971 Michigan
* 1972 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1973 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1974 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1975 Ohio State
* 1976 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1977 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1978 Michigan and Michigan State
* 1979 Ohio State
* 1980 Michigan
* 1981 Iowa and Ohio State
* 1982 Michigan
* 1983 Illinois
* 1984 Ohio State
* 1985 Iowa
* 1986 Michigan and Ohio State
* 1987 Michigan State
* 1988 Michigan
* 1989 Michigan
* 1990 Illinois, Iowa, Michigan and Michigan State
* 1991 Michigan
* 1992 Michigan
* 1993 Ohio State and Wisconsin
* 1994 Pennsylvania State University
* 1995 Northwestern
* 1996 Northwestern and Ohio State
* 1997 Michigan
* 1998 Michigan, Ohio State and Wisconsin
* 1999 Wisconsin
* 2000 Michigan, Northwestern and Purdue
* 2001 Illinois
* 2002 Iowa and Ohio State
* 2003 Michigan
* 2004 Iowa and Michigan
* 2005 Ohio State and Penn State


i did and quite frankily a three way tie in 1998 doesnt count for a pile manure in a horse stable and 1994 was PSU pal so keep on going back int he way back machine there and youll see.

Badgers are just vermin anyway...got to feed Falcons with something...or use them for target practice.

and here is link to the site it comes from just so you can see thereis no hanky panky with it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bi ... _champions

[MACMAN]

Macman stay off the drugs my friend. UW has won the big 10 in 93, 98, and 99. Also won the Rose Bowl everytime they been in it as well. So you are way off on that, on top of that the last 2 years people have picked us to finish in the bottom of the big 10. However we have finished in the top 3 both years.
Also someone stated that the 2003 BG would have beat are ase all over the field. Ok for one is I hate these arguements because they will never get solved. For 2 that was the same year we snapped OSU's huge win streak so I doubt if you would have beaten us all over the field.
Now on to the niz, no one cares if you have any respect for Wisconsin but you are totally wrong in saying that big 10 doesn't have any, when you hear tressel always talk about how he likes the way UW plays football and the coaches in the big 10 always respected Barry Alvarez. Respect us or not we will win Saturday and it's not going to be close. So then you can say well Wisconsin beat are ase for the 2nd year in a row but I still don't respect them. When you say Wisconsin you've said it all.

Again 1993 a tie with OSU no win there, that is 20% of the big ten fella and that dog wont hunt

Esp a 3 way tie which is more of a BCS circle jerk
No drugs just facts, football is about wining and losing, and a three way tie where every one wins is an imposibility and counts for NOTHING, NADA ZILICh
show some self respect badger realy try to hold your head high and accept championships when they are real, not from Mr. Rodgers or Captian Kangaroo.

But then again that is BCS way isnt it? Awarding championships like certificates of completion, instead of having ONE team Earn it on the field..

[BGDrew]

Either way, we're all getting drunk anyways.

You always have a way of extending the olive branch, Drew.

Beer would create world peace. It's a proven fact.

[brianthedog]

I guess those Rose Bowl wins after our titles after the 93 and 98 were Truman Show-style hoaxes, then? Should we give the trophies back?

Fool.

[Falconfreak90]

Looking forward to the rematch in a big way. Wisky's coach will be making his debut. BG and Wisky both have holes to fill. While I know the Falcons can with the game, it will be up to our defense and special teams. Our offense needs some work...we should be able to run the ball but I'm worried about the passing game. New QB with many new WR's....we will struggle at first.

Wisky is still Wisky. If we cannot stop the run, we'll get mauled. I think UW only has 3 O starters back and the one WR is now out for the year.

I'm going with my orange glasses on this one. Big Bird nails a 52 yard FG as the clock expires giving BGSU a 20-17 win. Or, we can't stop the run and get drilled 45-14. Nah....I like the first outcome much better.

At any rate, I want to welcome all the Wisky fans making the trip to Cleveland and hope this is an injury free game. Let's treat the Badger faithful as well as they treated our fans last year. I couldn't make the game but heard the Wisky fans were VERY cordial. Hey, they aren't UT!

GO FALCONS!!!

[MACMAN]

I guess those Rose Bowl wins after our titles after the 93 and 98 were Truman Show-style hoaxes, then? Should we give the trophies back?

Fool.

Did not say you not win the Rose Bowl nor did i imply that you did not win the rose bowl.
I did say you did not win the big 10.
Only because you did not win the big ten, no one did those years, no did they. Id some ONE did win they never told any one. Its ok we all know that all big ten teams are the best,
guess thats why no ones a losser in the big ten your all winers
gives me great ideas for the MAC...I know co champions from each side of the mac every year guys so we can be like the 10 where everyones a winer.


Hey enjoy going 6-6 this year and your Bowl reward, or is it a certificate of completion?...ROFLMO
Badgers Football
Its like watching Monte Python, only Badgers fans thinks its real.

[It's the Journey...]

I guess those Rose Bowl wins after our titles after the 93 and 98 were Truman Show-style hoaxes, then? Should we give the trophies back?

Fool.

Did not say you not win the Rose Bowl nor did i imply that you did not win the rose bowl.
I did say you did not win the big 10.
Only because you did not win the big ten, no one did those years, no did they. Id some ONE did win they never told any one. Its ok we all know that all big ten teams are the best,
guess thats why no ones a losser in the big ten your all winers
gives me great ideas for the MAC...I know co champions from each side of the mac every year guys so we can be like the 10 where everyones a winer.


Hey enjoy going 6-6 this year and your Bowl reward, or is it a certificate of completion?...ROFLMO
Badgers Football
Its like watching Monte Python, only Badgers fans thinks its real.

Have you ever thought of trying decaf?????

[Badger8843]

Either way the Big 10 rewards the conference winner who goes on and proceeds to play in the BCS game. Co-champions or not we still won it hense the word champion and then went on and won all 3 Rose Bowls. See this isn't a MAC title game, this is a BCS birth. 6-6 record huh?
Let me know if you want to make that bet right now because I will take everything you own. See we may lose 3-4 games a year but the competition is tough. You lose 2-3 a year but you play people like Eastern and Western Michigan every game throw toledo in there and akron LMFAO. If you played in the big 10 you might only win 1 or 2 games a year and that's me giving you a wins against Illinois and Indiana.
So keep playing the little man card as we will roll on you this year...again. Oh by the way macman you could win all of your games except for 1 and bg will still be playing sometime around christmas in the motor city bowl.........cold ase detroit, whereas we could lose 3 and still be playing on January 1st somewhere in Fla or Texas. I will send you a postcard if you want.

[The Niz]

Macman stay off the drugs my friend. UW has won the big 10 in 93, 98, and 99. Also won the Rose Bowl everytime they been in it as well. So you are way off on that, on top of that the last 2 years people have picked us to finish in the bottom of the big 10. However we have finished in the top 3 both years.
Also someone stated that the 2003 BG would have beat are ase all over the field. Ok for one is I hate these arguements because they will never get solved. For 2 that was the same year we snapped OSU's huge win streak so I doubt if you would have beaten us all over the field.
Now on to the niz, no one cares if you have any respect for Wisconsin but you are totally wrong in saying that big 10 doesn't have any, when you hear tressel always talk about how he likes the way UW plays football and the coaches in the big 10 always respected Barry Alvarez. Respect us or not we will win Saturday and it's not going to be close. So then you can say well Wisconsin beat are ase for the 2nd year in a row but I still don't respect them. When you say Wisconsin you've said it all.

Before you start 'badgering' me about my post,try to read between the lines a little bit and realize what I was axctually trying to say. You make yourself look rediculous when you attack someone's statement and don't even realize what they're tlaking about. In the future before you start commenting on my sh!t, remember that I am extremely cynical and sarcastic and then maybe you'll get where I'm coming from.

[Jacobs4Heisman]

Wisky -- More

BG -- Less


This is about the most unpredictable game I've seen in a while. We'll probably lose, but there are so many unknowns going into this game, I have no idea what kind of score might emerge.

Maybe a lot of the young guys impress for us and Wisconsin has their classic first game hiccup and we squeak one out. Maybe we can't stop the run again and Wisconsin wins by 50. I have no idea.

[BuckyFan]

I agree. This game has too many variables to be predictable. I just hope the game is injury free. Wisconsin can not afford to suffer anymore player losses to injury.

Good luck!