Would you like to see Tekekini banned?

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 3:47 pm

No, cuz he's quite humerous. He's good comic relief. I say if we're gonna ban Teke we could quite well make a habit of it and that would't be good. Tek's been a bore most of the time but I don't think he's done anything worth being banned for............yet.

Peregrinner · Post by **Peregrinner** » Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:03 pm

As much as the guy pisses me off and as sick as I am of OSU blather, I don't know if an outright ban is the right step to take. Yeah, he's annoying as hell, yeah, he's an OSU homer, yeah, he disses BGSU in every way (this made it a close call), but banning him will only make things worse. He'll come back and we'll hear more.

Falconfreak90 · Post by **Falconfreak90** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:49 am

He'll just end up back here with a different name. He's a schmuck and he knows it. And, God forbid, if the mighty Buck$ somehow lose to the Falcons on 10/7? I guarantee he won't be back. Now, the odds of this upset happening are probably 50-1 but hey, why not?

tekekini · Post by **tekekini** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 8:23 am

You guys should really listen to Dayons Den. The fact that I would talk good things about OSU while talking good things about BG, you would personally attack me when I defended OSU.

Therefore I became personal towards yu guys and started to care less about defending BG. It carries on to this day.

I am quite knowledgeable about football as a whole. You disagree because I see a lot of thngs from a different point of view than you guys do so I am automatically evil.

This is how things used to go. I only talked pro BG stuff. Then one of you guys would start a negative OSU thread. Since one of YOU started the thread I figured it was ok to talk about the buckeyes. And it was ok as long as it had negative tones. I spoke positive of the Bucks so people got mad instead of listening and debating. I started to realize what type of people I was dealing with and it went on from there.

and it wasnt just a few people who werent willing to accept others opinions, It was most of you. I never ever said you had to agree or suddenly like Ohio State, I never once said that. My argument this whole time was that you are closed minded people who dont listen to anyone who has a different vision of things.

Some of you, began trying to personally attack me (which I never took personal but I could see what you were doing) so I decided to start giving it back just to piss you guys off. Eventually all of the unwillingness to open your minds began to push me away from any care I had left for BG and the type of people participating on this board and therefore became 100% against BG in everything I say.

To this day this is still how it goes and you have not gotten the idea yet that if the negative attacks on OSU stopped or held to a minimum I would come back and give positive comments about football or BG and contribute meaningful posts. I dont care if you talk about OSU as it relates to the game vs. BGSU. I would expect that. But when you go out of your way to post about 17 fires set after the texas game, or how you visited a BG board and asked them how many teams have ever won more games than they had starters returning and then post the OSU fans reactions on here then I fail to see the point or the purpose of the threads?

It seems like you people have a need to go out of your way to make negative threads against OSU but then when I step in I am breaking a law for giving my thoughts people bitch about OSU being brought up?? Here is a GREAT IDEA...Dont talk about OSU anymore?? hmmm...genius!

Believe it or not fellas, we had the same goal from the beginning, we just took different approaches to it. You guys used to bitch about OSU threads being started when I first started here. When you bitched about those threads you tried to trash OSU. I guess that was your way of trying to get OSU talk off of the board? It wasn't working.

I didnt like the OSU trash talking all the time on a BGSU board so I wanted it to stop so I would talk positive about them all the time and piss you off enough that you would eventually stop. I am getting close to accomplishing.

Metelantwerp starts a lot of posts, about OSU, and they are negative, right away he was being attacked for starting the post. It was beautiful. I am close to accomplishing my goal, to eliminate unneccessary OSU talk.

The very same idea that you people had originally sought in the first place.

I am very serious right now. What is the point of threads describing inaccuraely, how much you think OSU cheats, how bad some of the fans are, how evil OSU is whenever Clarrett gets caught with guns, or how it is their fault for how he turned out? I Mean don't parents have any responsibilites for their child anymore? These posts serve no purpose on here? They belong on an OSU thread, sure! but on here if they do not talk about the matchup with BG then no point at all.

Ban me or don't ban me, I do not care but atleast you now know what my purpose was this entire time. I had to take a different approach and piss off a lot of people to achieve it, but it is getting close.

As long as I am still allowed to post here and as long as there is negative OSU talk I will be a thorn in your side. If it ends, then maybe I will go away or maybe I will stay and contribute positive thoughts on the game of football, and BGSU once again.

take it for what its worth.

Thats all 100% the truth.

Dayons Den hit it right on the head.

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:42 am

tekekini wrote:I dont go to BG. I do not acknowledge ever going there anymore. In fact I believe I started a fire in my fireplace last winter with my diploma

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:08 am

Ban him? Why? He's the perfect embodiment of the stereotypical arrogant, ignorant OSU slappy. He proves our arguments about jagoff Buckeye fans with each and every post. I think we should encourage him to participate more and continue his fine work as a representative of the rat hole known as The Ohio State University

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:15 am

Flipper wrote:Ban him? Why? He's the perfect embodiment of the stereotypical arrogant, ignorant OSU slappy. He proves our arguments about jagoff Buckeye fans with each and every post. I think we should encourage him to participate more and continue his fine work as a representative of the rat hole known as The Ohio State University

Yeah, I'm down with that.

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:22 pm

All I want to know is who gave tek the authority to police the content of this board? Apparently Sherrif Squishypants thinks this is his jurisdiction...

He doesn't like the way people are talking so he wants to piss people off and make fun of people until they conform to his conception of what is germain?

Wow.

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:39 pm

Don't assign that much importance to his or his efforts. I'm a smart guy....I know why things are funny and I understand the use of parody and satire. Tek is essentially doing a parody of a person who hates BGSU and loves OSU. What he fails to realize is that if you assume a persona too frequently or for too long of a period of time, "it" ceases to be the joke and "you" become the joke. You become nothing more than a parody of yourself. People begin to assume you're just an ass and they tune you out.

Why waste time banning or getting upset over what some idiot who isn't even honest with himself much less other people? It's a fools errand....

tekekini · Post by **tekekini** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 7:47 am

I was being serious, you didnt want to listen.

thats the path you have chosen. Be ready because it can get worse.

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:28 am

tekekini wrote:I dont go to BG. I do not acknowledge ever going there anymore. In fact I believe I started a fire in my fireplace last winter with my diploma

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:54 am

tekekini wrote:I was being serious, you didnt want to listen.

thats the path you have chosen. Be ready because it can get worse.

I question your intelligence, sir.

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 3:17 pm

tekekini wrote:I was being serious, you didnt want to listen.

thats the path you have chosen. Be ready because it can get worse.

I really do not care...you yourself have stated that you're engaging in this anti social behavoir to satisy some bizarre ulterior motive, so why should anyone take anything you post seriously?

If I truly were annoyed by you, I would have deleted or edited most of your posts even if it did rachet up the conflict, but the truth of the matter is I don't care enough to exert even that minimal effort to deal with you.

You actually remind me of this lttle fellow....

Get a life, Professor Chaos...

Zom · Post by **Zom** » Sun Sep 17, 2006 5:45 pm

I vote.... not, because Thomas Paine says:

“The most formidable weapon against errors of every kind is reason".

Eventually, T will either moderate, because his voice alone will never be sufficient to sway AZZ to his liking, or he will retire of his own volition because his principle prohibits him from moderation. Banning T would only serve to justify the reasons for his "jihad" in the first place.

Lastly, just as T's allegiances vascillate between BGSU and OSU, it is not impossible that T's allegiances could just as easily be tickled by Youngstown State (very similar red), Temple (more burgundy than red), or even Michigan (no red at all). Whoever he chooses to support, I am sure his opinions would be just as entertaining as they are now.

HoustonFalcon · Post by **HoustonFalcon** » Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:29 pm

I voted yes. I voted yes because I have seen a different type of OSU fan since being down here. Tek, in my situation, doesn't represent most OSU fans that I know. Most of the OSU fans have respect for BG, and haven't said one bad thing about them. They are very passionate about OSU, and I admire that. There is a big alumni following down here in Houston, and they all get together and watch each game at the sports bar, set up speakers and play the fight song, alma mater, and hang on sloopy quite often before and during the game. I have actually grown to like OSU, only because of the fans I have had the fortune to meet down here. The first time I met them was the last BG/OSU game, and they were nice from the very beginning.

Tek on the other hand, I have a different view of. I don't give him the pleasure of posting a reply to anything that he says, I let the rest of you do that. But he really has become obnoxious. To call BG smelly, gay, and whatever else he used in trying to justify cutting off all ties to the place that he chose to get a degree, really makes me steam. Everyone else on here loves BG, and I know that I can't wait until the next time I get to come back to the place that I will always call home. That's fine if he doesn't feel the same way, it's his opinion, but to come on here and say those things is just ignorant. Defending OSU is one thing. I agree that there are sometimes over the top things that are posted, and I don't really care for those comments either. But to say that he is going to start a fire with his degree from BG, that's crossing a line. I have become a semi OSU supporter because of the passionate fans that I have met while down here, but they are nothing like Tek. He takes it way over the line, and it's time for him to go. I know he does things to get rises out of people, and he's good at it. A lot of you are going to say that I'm wrong, and that's fine. I just prefer to have people on here who might not like some of the things that are going on in BG, but they disagree with those things because they love BG, not disown it.

Would you like to see Tekekini banned?

Would you like to see Tekekini banned?

I voted.......