Opelt v Sheehan for 4 years

Globetrotter · Post by **Globetrotter** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:36 am

That would be an interesting rivalry after a couple of games.

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:47 am

A. No one has said Sheehan is our starting QB.
B. Opelt only got a chance to play since Cochrane was injured. Not sure of Cochrane's status, but I don't think you can assume Opelt is #1 when both are healthy.
C. The Toledo game is two and a half weeks away. Can we concentrate on trying to beat Akron first.

Globetrotter · Post by **Globetrotter** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:18 am

Warthog wrote:A. No one has said Sheehan is our starting QB.
B. Opelt only got a chance to play since Cochrane was injured. Not sure of Cochrane's status, but I don't think you can assume Opelt is #1 when both are healthy.
C. The Toledo game is two and a half weeks away. Can we concentrate on trying to beat Akron first.

a. I agree.
b. I did not know that, It hought he was given the starting nod.
c. We can only talk about the team coming up this week, good to know, I did not know that was one of the rules of the message board.

Warthog · Post by **Warthog** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:42 am

MatelaAntwerp wrote:c. We can only talk about the team coming up this week, good to know, I did not know that was one of the rules of the message board.

You can talk about whatever you want. But let's wait until that game comes around and they are both starting before we discuss a matchup that might not even happen.

Globetrotter · Post by **Globetrotter** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:36 pm

Warthog wrote:
MatelaAntwerp wrote:c. We can only talk about the team coming up this week, good to know, I did not know that was one of the rules of the message board.
You can talk about whatever you want. But let's wait until that game comes around and they are both starting before we discuss a matchup that might not even happen.

If I dont throw these ideas out there early I wont seem as smart when they happen 8)