MACMAN wrote:The Miami knockoff sucks and is unacceptable.
It is hardly a Miami knock off.
Our retail logo is very much in the abstract tradition of the the traditional logo. It only consists of a few bold lines. It remains two dimensional.
In contrast, Miami's logo is much more detailed and lifelike, with extra lines designed to imply feathers and three dimensions.
The similiarity people are seeing is in the implied expressions.
Miami's RedHawk appears to be one pissed-off bird.
The triangular shaped eye in our retail logo works with the downward curve of the beak to imply that our bird is also surly. But these are the only cues, and only by impilcation, really. I would urge you to go back and compare these cues with the Miami bird.
Look at the RedHawk's detailed beak. Look at curl of its mouth. Look at its round eyes (and eyeballs). Look at the suggestion of eye brows.
Our logo has none of that detail. It's quite abstract -- and the fact that our abstract retail logo evokes a mood at all suggests the amount of thought and artistry that went into it.
Ours is a good logo, and it springs from our own tradition. The fact that its implied demeanor is similiar is just one of those things about sports logos. Most of the expressions are pretty cranky. It's sports, after all -- not comedy.