Oh Elton...

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:39 pm

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:
falconboy wrote:
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:
falconboy wrote:, our lady falcons will again undoubtedly be the least physically or athletically/size talented team in the Tourney.
You've lost all speaking priveleges now. This is patently untrue.
Oh really? Prove it.
On second thought, you're probably right. 15-17 Holy Cross is probably much bigger faster and stronger than we are.

Never said every team in the Tourney will be, but about 85-90% of them will be. Its whats makes us "bluecollar" if you will.

PGY Tiercel · Post by **PGY Tiercel** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:40 pm

falconboy wrote:
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:
falconboy wrote:, our lady falcons will again undoubtedly be the least physically or athletically/size talented team in the Tourney.
You've lost all speaking priveleges now. This is patently untrue.
Oh really? Prove it.

Well there are these teams already in, Tx Arlington (BG beat already), Robert Morris (BG beat already), Drake (in with a 14-18 record), Holy Cross (15-17), Prairie View A&M (RPI 209, SOS 299). Plus a whole other host of teams with lower RPIs, weaker Schedules and worse Records, coming out of weaker conferences. (MAC is 11 out of 32,).

I cannot imagine for one second that teams coming out of weaker conferences, are able to recruit bigger more athletic players any better than BG is able too. To say that BG is the smallest and least athletic out of 64 teams probably is ridiculous. I can only imagine that you spend more looking at your colon than at other teams.

Jacobs4Heisman · Post by **Jacobs4Heisman** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:41 pm

falconboy wrote:
Never said every team in the Tourney will be, but about 85-90% of them will be. Its whats makes us "bluecollar" if you will.

I must have misunderstood you when you said this then:

falconboy wrote:, our lady falcons will again undoubtedly be the least physically or athletically/size talented team in the Tourney.

PGY Tiercel · Post by **PGY Tiercel** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:42 pm

falconboy wrote: our lady falcons will again undoubtedly be the least physically or athletically/size talented team in the Tourney.

I'll bold that statement that contradicts what you just said.

Edit* J4h beat me to it, but I think FB will need to read it at least twice before he gets a clue.

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:46 pm

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:
falconboy wrote:
Never said every team in the Tourney will be, but about 85-90% of them will be. Its whats makes us "bluecollar" if you will.
I must have misunderstood you when you said this then:

falconboy wrote:, our lady falcons will again undoubtedly be the least physically or athletically/size talented team in the Tourney.

Ok, I retract most of that of that a little. I sorta did go overboard, but we won't be turning heads with our raw talent nontheless. We play as a team better than most teams individual super athletes. Rober Morris is a nice case, they had better athletism across the board over us, but we outplayed them easily cuz we were the better TEAM by leaps and bounds.