John Harris has a CFN Article...

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
UK Peregrine
Transcendent Illuminati
Transcendent Illuminati
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:48 am
Location: Grand Valley State University
Contact:

John Harris has a CFN Article...

Post by UK Peregrine »

and he picks Marshall over BG. Surprise, surprise! :coo-coo: *Edit* Wrong John Harris, I'm an idiot. Interesting read nonetheless.

By John Harris

a.  The Pope’s parishioners – A running back in a spread offense often gets ‘lost’ behind a dual threat quarterback or a talented crop ofwide receivers.  Excuse Falcon PJ Pope if he has felt as if he’s been a bit overshadowedthe past two years.  Well, it’s a safe guess that the Thundering Herd knows all about #33 and the Herd’s ability to stop him is a big key to this football game.  Pope is coming off one of the best games in his career, one in which he ran for 205 yards on only 12 carries against Western Michigan – do the math, that’s a 17 yard per carry average.  Now, Marshall’s run defense is a bit stouter than the Broncos unit, but Pope remains a big factor nonetheless.  Pope has the quicks to get to the corner on the gun zone stretch play and the speed/flash option in which he’s the pitch man, which is a huge problem for the Marshall defense.  It’s hard to sell out to stop Pope because of the efficient play of Omar Jacobs throwing the football, but if the Marshall front can’t string out Pope and take away his downhill running lanes, it’ll be a long day away from home.


b.  Could you block him? – Erasmus James of Wisconsin has been downright dominating at the defensive end position.  David Pollack of Georgia gets the most publicity.  But, the guy that has had the best year at that position is Jonathon Goddard of Marshall.  Quite simply, the senior from Jacksonville has dominated each and every time he has stepped on the field.  He’s second in the nation in sacks with 12.5 and has registered an astounding 23.5 tackles for a loss – a total of 238 yards in losses.  Wow.  And, it’s not as if Goddard has done this against the Weak Sisters of the Poor, it’s been done against the likes of Georgia and Ohio State.  So, how does Bowling Green account for him on Saturday?  Take advantage of Goddard’s pass rush ability and run underneath him with counter treys or shovel passes.  Also, use the flash option to put him in decision making mode – QB or Pope ; if anything it slows him down a step.  Outside zone stretch runs toward Goddard are cutback runs waiting to happen, but if the interior center-guard trio can wall off the backside (that means ‘handling’ Jamus Martin and Reggie Hayes – easier said than done), Pope may be able to squirt underneath Goddard and into the secondary.  Bowling Green doesn’t need an introduction to this cat, but they do need to find a way to keep him under control.

c.  The Duke of Earl – Discuss Marshall offensive football and much of the talk turns to Stan Hill and Josh Davis, i.e the passing game.  With that in mind, the Herd running game, led by power back Earl Charles, should be a major key in this game.  The Falcon run defense is giving up nearly 140 yards a game, and Charles and the Herd offensive line have to attack that perceived weakness for a couple reasons.  The first one is obvious – run to daylight.  A strong rushing performance by Charles opens up the entire playbook for the Marshall offensive staff.  Stan Hill can’t throw the football 53 times if Marshall expects to win.  Charles’s ability to move the chains takes some pressure off of Hill and Davis, and might convince the Falcons to pull the safety into the box to help stop him.  The second reason is that’ll keep the vaunted BGSU offense off of the field.  And, that might be the more important of the two aspects.

Conclusion:  The dichotomous nature of this game is quite intriguing – Bowling Green’s dominating offense, best in the MAC against Marshall’s unyielding defense, the best in the MAC.  The irresistible force against the immovable object.  Who’s going to blink first?  As fun as that matchup will be to watch, the Herd offense will have something to say about who wins this game.  After blowing a sure lead against Akron, Marshall has to get back on track to lock down the MAC East title.  Although it’s on the road, it’ll happen.  Marshall – 31 vs. Bowling Green – 30


http://www.collegefootballnews.com/2004 ... gGreen.htm :evil: :coo-coo:
User avatar
ZiggyZoomba
The Wizard of AZZ
The Wizard of AZZ
Posts: 5916
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: Elmore, OH

Re: John Harris has a CFN Article...

Post by ZiggyZoomba »

UK Peregrine Fan wrote: By John Harris

Conclusion: The dichotomous nature of this game is quite intriguing – Bowling Green’s dominating offense, best in the MAC against Marshall’s unyielding defense, the best in the MAC. The irresistible force against the immovable object. Who’s going to blink first?


Where did this guy learn to "write?" :ugh: ::puke::
Grant Cummings
ROLL ALONG!!!
"We are linked to this institution by invisible bonds that do not wither or dissolve." --BGSU President, Dr. Ralph W. McDonald - 1968
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18332
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

I think he got his degree for free with an oil change. He would've gotten a Master's as well, but he really couldn't afford the new set of tires...
Dr. Bucko
Chick
Chick
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:16 pm

Post by Dr. Bucko »

Mr. UK Peregrin

Evolution is a "theory" in a scientific sense which means it's a statement of probable fact. Gravity, conversely, is a Law.
User avatar
BGSUfanatUT
rubs smooth arms
rubs smooth arms
Posts: 1355
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Bowling Green

Post by BGSUfanatUT »

you only need to click it once buddy.
Image
"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. A rocket is always a dildo."
~Rightupinthere
User avatar
UK Peregrine
Transcendent Illuminati
Transcendent Illuminati
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:48 am
Location: Grand Valley State University
Contact:

Post by UK Peregrine »

Dr. Bucko wrote:Mr. UK Peregrin

Evolution is a "theory" in a scientific sense which means it's a statement of probable fact. Gravity, conversely, is a Law.
Well, this isn't what I expected as a reply to another idiotic John Harris artcile, but I did expect someone, sometime would have a problem with my quote. Anyways, I'll address your point here once, then we can talk more in the free-for-all thread or over email. The quote is meant to illustrate that both evoultion and gravity are indeed THEORIES. The word "theory," in the context of science, does not imply uncertainty. The theory of evolution has proved itself in practice, just like gravity. Besides the "theory" of evolution, there is also the fact of evolution, which is that gene frequencies (life if you prefer) has changed over time. This fact of evolution pre-dates Darwin's theory of natural selection, which is just one mechanism through which evolution can occur.

There are a lot of theories in science, the theory of gravity, atomic theory, and the germ theory of disease are just a few. The theory of evolution is no less valid than any of these. Even the theory of gravity still receives serious challenges today in the scientific literature. Yet the phenomenon of gravity, like evolution, is still a scientific theory supported by myriads of data caches, whic essentially means that it is a fact based on all of the knowledge we have accumulated overtime. Stephen J. Gould once put this argument down much more eloquently than I can ever hope to, so take a look at his argument and then we can talk more.


Well evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape-like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered.

Moreover, "fact" doesn't mean "absolute certainty"; there ain't no such animal in an exciting and complex world. The final proofs of logic and mathematics flow deductively from stated premises and achieve certainty only because they are not about the empirical world. Evolutionists make no claim for perpetual truth, though creationists often do (and then attack us falsely for a style of argument that they themselves favor). In science "fact" can only mean "confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional consent." I suppose that apples might start to rise tomorrow, but the possibility does not merit equal time in physics classrooms.

Evolutionists have been very clear about this distinction of fact and theory from the very beginning, if only because we have always acknowledged how far we are from completely understanding the mechanisms (theory) by which evolution (fact) occurred. Darwin continually emphasized the difference between his two great and separate accomplishments: establishing the fact of evolution, and proposing a theory--natural selection--to explain the mechanism of evolution.
- Stephen J. Gould
User avatar
BGSU_via_UDel
Egg
Egg
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 3:51 pm
Location: Newark, Delaware

Post by BGSU_via_UDel »

I wonder if this guy has watched ANY of our games? We haven't played cupcakes either (Oklahoma, NIU) and every other game against the cupcakes we have crushed them while Marshall has struggled against and/or lost to teams like Troy, Akron, et cetera. I don't care how good their D-Line is, our O-Line has given up 5 sacks in 9 games and thats pretty damn impressive. Our offense is better than theirs by far and our defense has stepped it up. The stats are meaningless when you consider that our starters are out much of the 3rd and 4th quarters in the games that we win big so of COURSE we'll be giving up more yards! My god people this isn't rocket science. I don't think this game will be very close, I think BG wins by 3-4 TD's and the spread is 10 points.
User avatar
UK Peregrine
Transcendent Illuminati
Transcendent Illuminati
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:48 am
Location: Grand Valley State University
Contact:

Post by UK Peregrine »

BGSU_via_UDel wrote:I wonder if this guy has watched ANY of our games? We haven't played cupcakes either (Oklahoma, NIU) and every other game against the cupcakes we have crushed them while Marshall has struggled against and/or lost to teams like Troy, Akron, et cetera. I don't care how good their D-Line is, our O-Line has given up 5 sacks in 9 games and thats pretty damn impressive. Our offense is better than theirs by far and our defense has stepped it up. The stats are meaningless when you consider that our starters are out much of the 3rd and 4th quarters in the games that we win big so of COURSE we'll be giving up more yards! My god people this isn't rocket science. I don't think this game will be very close, I think BG wins by 3-4 TD's and the spread is 10 points.
*Edit* I messed up earlier in assuming this was the same John Harris as our friend at the Blade. Sorry for any confusion.
User avatar
Warthog
Freak Wanna-be!!
Freak Wanna-be!!
Posts: 7039
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bowling Green, OH

Post by Warthog »

Not sure it is the same John Harris writing for the Blade and for collegefootballnews.com. :shrug:
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
User avatar
rc_ziggy84
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 656
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 12:06 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Post by rc_ziggy84 »

That would be one heck of a coincidence then. There are many similarities between them.
The (Graduated) "OU Falcon"
User avatar
Warthog
Freak Wanna-be!!
Freak Wanna-be!!
Posts: 7039
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bowling Green, OH

Post by Warthog »

The writer on cfn has an e-mail address at ev1.net. Ev1.net is an isp in Texas so I think it is just a coincidence.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
User avatar
Warthog
Freak Wanna-be!!
Freak Wanna-be!!
Posts: 7039
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bowling Green, OH

Not the same John Harris, for sure.

Post by Warthog »

I sent him an e-mail and here is the reply:

Patrick -

Thanks for the email, but I do not write for the Toledo Blade, just for collegefootballnews.com. I live in North Carolina and have never been to Toledo, although I need to see a Rockets game there one day. So, I don't know if that's fortunate or unfortunate, but I'm not him. Thanks for reading and appreciate the email. Take care. John Harris
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
User avatar
BGSUfanatUT
rubs smooth arms
rubs smooth arms
Posts: 1355
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Bowling Green

Post by BGSUfanatUT »

lucky him :o
Image
"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. A rocket is always a dildo."
~Rightupinthere
User avatar
UK Peregrine
Transcendent Illuminati
Transcendent Illuminati
Posts: 2875
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:48 am
Location: Grand Valley State University
Contact:

Re: Not the same John Harris, for sure.

Post by UK Peregrine »

Warthog wrote:I sent him an e-mail and here is the reply:

Patrick -

Thanks for the email, but I do not write for the Toledo Blade, just for collegefootballnews.com. I live in North Carolina and have never been to Toledo, although I need to see a Rockets game there one day. So, I don't know if that's fortunate or unfortunate, but I'm not him. Thanks for reading and appreciate the email. Take care. John Harris
My Bad. I assumed he was the same guy. If you assume, apparently it just makes an @$$ out of only me. Sorry.
Dr. Bucko
Chick
Chick
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:16 pm

Post by Dr. Bucko »

Well, UK Peregrine, that was one impressive, well articulated answer. No doubt you hold a degree from BG ---- maybe your even a biologist. The big problem is the continuous corruption of the word "theory." It has as many different meanings as their are people who chose to use it inappropriately. To the layman, the word theory is often nothing more than a hypothesis, a guess. To the scientist, the word theory is a statement of probable fact (probable I said) based upon a body of experimental evident. ---- Whatever, I enjoyed/appreciated your response. I'm glad we're both BG people. And I know we agree on one point --- GO BG!
Post Reply