HERE IS THE "UPDATE" ON "88"

B.L. @ C.P. · Post by **B.L. @ C.P.** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 3:55 pm

GB AND MW ASKED "88" TO GO TO "D".....HE ALSO WILL BE AT "O" WHEN NEED BE......NOTHING ETCHED IN STONE YET....."88" WILL PLAY ANYWHERE THE COACHES SEE FIT FOR HIM TO PLAY TO HELP THE TEAM BE SUCCESSFUL HIS LAST YEAR...WIN THE M.A.C., WIN A BOWL GAME....NO UNDERCLASS MAN TOOK HIS POSITION[/b]

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:26 pm

B.L. @ C.P. wrote:GB AND MW ASKED "88" TO GO TO "D".....HE ALSO WILL BE AT "O" WHEN NEED BE......NOTHING ETCHED IN STONE YET....."88" WILL PLAY ANYWHERE THE COACHES SEE FIT FOR HIM TO PLAY TO HELP THE TEAM BE SUCCESSFUL HIS LAST YEAR...WIN THE M.A.C., WIN A BOWL GAME....NO UNDERCLASS MAN TOOK HIS POSITION[/b]

Huh.

Stilll doesn't tell us much. So he's going to play both ways now? Is our depth at DE that bad? Yikes. Hammb appears more and more like a frickin' genius everyday.

BGFootball · Post by **BGFootball** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:40 pm

I have seen no evidence proving that Odro will be playing TE still...he has been playing DE since the winter, every practice, and during the spring practices. Maybe thats just so he can learn the position since he already is used to the TE position. But, I have yet to hear/see him playin offense since winter practices started.

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:41 pm

BGFootball wrote:I have seen no evidence proving that Odro will be playing TE still...he has been playing DE since the winter, every practice, and during the spring practices. Maybe thats just so he can learn the position since he already is used to the TE position. But, I have yet to hear/see him playin offense since winter practices started.

I'm gonna assume Big Lou might know what he's talking about though...I mean they are related.

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:21 pm

BL..when I said Reike and Scheidler must look good I didn't mean to suggest they were looking better than Sean...just that they perhaps looked good enough to make the switch possible.

On the bright side of things...if he takes to the position it could improve his prospects for playing at the next level. The demand for DE's with some athleticism and size is greater than the demand for TE's

BGFootball · Post by **BGFootball** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:27 pm

I wasnt suggesting he didnt know what he was talkin about...

MarkL · Post by **MarkL** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:42 pm

It could also be a sign of McCall changing the offense from the run first to a pass first offense. Back in the days of Jacobs and Harris when we passed a lot more, the TE position was not much utilized, so a guy as athletic as Sean may be better suited at DE. The TE position became more utilized with the run offense. That would be cool to go back to the offense which put up insane numbers ...

B.L. @ C.P. · Post by **B.L. @ C.P.** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:20 pm

SOME MORE INFORMATON TO PONDER......NEW COACH'S, NEW IDEAS, NEW POSITIONS......CHANGE IS GOOD......DIDN'T THE "D" LOSE TWO "DE'S"? NOT FROM LAST YEAR BUT, BEFORE? ALSO, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, "88" WAS A "DE" AND A "TE".....RECRUITED IN BOTH POSITIONS......MAYBE THE FALCONS ARE GOING BACK TO THE JOSH HARRIS DAYS......USING THE "TE" CLOSE TO THE GOAL LINE.....REMEMBER OHIO STATE GAME?????.....THIS IS TIME FOR THE COACH'S TO HUNT FOR NEW IDEAS.....LETS SEE WHAT HAPPENS......REMEMBER, TRYING NEW THINGS IS BETTER THAN KEEPING OLD THINGS THAT DIE.....NOTHING AT THIS TIME IS SOLID.....WE NEED CHANGE AND WE HAVE IT......FOR NOW......

falconfan1999 · Post by **falconfan1999** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:44 pm

I'm for whatever gets up the most "W's"!!! Sean seems to be pretty athletic to me, with pretty good size. Maybe he'll be playing Iron Man football and taking snaps on both sides of the ball!

San Diego Falcon · Post by **San Diego Falcon** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:24 pm

Whenever someone types with the caps lock on, I find myself giving that person's opinions more credence. So authoritative.

reyray82 · Post by **reyray82** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 3:14 pm

I'm sure the coach would much rather have a player step in to a roll to fill a weakness, than stay in a strong position with depth. We need Senior leadership on De and depth at line. We got 2 back to back winnable BIG 10 games to start the season. We will need depth to stay healthy early. Besides isnt the QB situation a more pressing matter?

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:31 pm

San Diego Falcon wrote:Whenever someone types with the caps lock on, I find myself giving that person's opinions more credence. So authoritative.

eRichFalcon · Post by **eRichFalcon** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:51 pm

San Diego Falcon wrote:Whenever someone types with the caps lock on, I find myself giving that person's opinions more credence. So authoritative.

it just makes me feel like they're angry. this may or may not have been the case here, but it was a very well thought out post with very legitimate points. props to that, whether it be in caps or not

1987alum · Post by **1987alum** » Thu Mar 29, 2007 4:55 pm

reyray82 wrote:IWe got 2 back to back winnable BIG 10 games to start the season.

And people think I'm the resident optimist around here!

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:40 pm

Mike Birch former football manager I was standing next to said some words to 'Odro and he mentioned he was now practicing only with DE's now. So thats got to be as official as anything I'd say. Looking back on this, I can say now that if this move actually helps our D-line dominate the LOS, I'm all for it.

HERE IS THE "UPDATE" ON "88"

HERE IS THE "UPDATE" ON "88"

Re: HERE IS THE "UPDATE" ON "88"

At the BG Lady Falcon Rally.....