another reason why i hate OSU fans

h2oville rocket · Post by **h2oville rocket** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:14 am

tekekini wrote:
h2oville rocket wrote:
tekekini wrote:
redskins4ever wrote:Tek feels so proud of himself everytime he posts... its like he is having a real life conversation with people.
it is the opposite.
It's the opposite? So you feel no pride when you post? You are then, actually ashamed when you post? Makes sense.
you can tell when I am not being serious.

occasionally, there are things on here actually worth contributing too so I do.

Most of the time, it is the same old hypocritical BS.

this is how things used to go before the creation of the other schools forum:

{azz memner creates a thread about Ohio State to trash them about some thing for some reason}
{said thread contains two or three pages of comments that are way out there and rediculous that the people must be in dreamland}
{I make a post with the opposite view of the ones posting to the threads, just to give a different point of view}
{Azz members then redicule me (and this was before I starting being a heckler on here) and started crying because Ohio state was being talked about so the thread would be locked}
{24 hours later, AZZ members create a new OSU bashing thread and the same cycle repeats}

Now, after a few more cycles of that BS I caught on to what was going to happen.

So I simply started hijacing them and it has continued on this far.

Grant created other schools because of me.

and the BS still continues with the genralizations

so i will continue to hijack.

and you keep feeding me reasons too.

Oh-so you're NOT a sociopath, you're an unappreciated genius. My bad! A delusional unappreciated genius, but then so many are.

mmisbg · Post by **mmisbg** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:32 pm

h2oville rocket wrote:There is a term for people who don't care at all what other people think. The term is sociopath. Fact! Any good psychiatrists in that town where you have a wife, own a house, earn the big bucks, wear orange BG shorts, pretend you went to osu and hijack threads?

How many times do I have to tell you people? They are not shorts.

h2oville rocket · Post by **h2oville rocket** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:48 pm

mmisbg wrote:
h2oville rocket wrote:There is a term for people who don't care at all what other people think. The term is sociopath. Fact! Any good psychiatrists in that town where you have a wife, own a house, earn the big bucks, wear orange BG shorts, pretend you went to osu and hijack threads?
How many times do I have to tell you people? They are not shorts.

Tricky_Falcon · Post by **Tricky_Falcon** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:12 pm

How does that Honda Pilot commercial go again?

Beloved by humans envied by trolls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0O51q8akz3A

I guess the same can be said with Ay-ziggy-zoomba.com.

tekekini · Post by **tekekini** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:24 pm

This can get better but you are going to have to work at it.

This all started because of your failures to discuss OSU topics by debating instead of making personal attacks. You guys made personal attacks against people who discussed OSU is a pro OSU manner So I got in and made personal attacks back.

If you would learn to discuss OSU in the other schools forum in a resctable manner, meaning debate and not fight, I wouldn't have to be such a troll. I would contribute and debate as well instead of hijacking threads.

I have told you this before and it obviously didn't work so I have my doubts that it will ever work but at least I reminded you what needs to be done.

BGFalconfromCincy · Post by **BGFalconfromCincy** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:26 pm

tekekini wrote:This can get better but you are going to have to work at it.

This all started because of your failures to discuss OSU topics by debating instead of making personal attacks. You guys made personal attacks against people who discussed OSU is a pro OSU manner So I got in and made personal attacks back.

If you would learn to discuss OSU in the other schools forum in a resctable manner, meaning debate and not fight, I wouldn't have to be such a troll. I would contribute and debate as well instead of hijacking threads.

I have told you this before and it obviously didn't work so I have my doubts that it will ever work but at least I reminded you what needs to be done.

All I will say is this, two negatives don't equal a positive.

I undersatnd that you were upset about the attacks to those pro OSU, but you responding in a negative way doesn't help. If you try and turn the post positive others will follow. Also you posting a negative to counter a negative about OSU is going to make more people be negative about OSU, and the cycle of being negative will not end.

That's just my opinion, if you agree with me that's cool, and if you don't, I really don't care

tekekini · Post by **tekekini** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:01 pm

BGFalconfromCincy wrote:
tekekini wrote:This can get better but you are going to have to work at it.

This all started because of your failures to discuss OSU topics by debating instead of making personal attacks. You guys made personal attacks against people who discussed OSU is a pro OSU manner So I got in and made personal attacks back.

If you would learn to discuss OSU in the other schools forum in a resctable manner, meaning debate and not fight, I wouldn't have to be such a troll. I would contribute and debate as well instead of hijacking threads.

I have told you this before and it obviously didn't work so I have my doubts that it will ever work but at least I reminded you what needs to be done.
All I will say is this, two negatives don't equal a positive.

I undersatnd that you were upset about the attacks to those pro OSU, but you responding in a negative way doesn't help. If you try and turn the post positive others will follow. Also you posting a negative to counter a negative about OSU is going to make more people be negative about OSU, and the cycle of being negative will not end.

That's just my opinion, if you agree with me that's cool, and if you don't, I really don't care

I did this once..I apologized to BO and the rest of this community and a few days later, the same thing kept on happening. People got personal again when I made pro OSU talk without bein negative, demeaning, rude or any of those things.

I did try, if BO remembers our conversations he can tell you that we tried to resolve it. It didnt work out, so I just assumed it would never work out, everyone was going personally attack those who do like OSU so I just keep hijacking threads.

I tried.

Falcon30 · Post by **Falcon30** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:40 pm

Look at Tekekini taking the "high ground"

What a friggin hypocrite. "I act like an ass because other people do." Do you realize how STUPID you sound, Don Quixote?

If you're going to hijack the board, hijack the board. Don't try to justify your stupid behavior with this pathetic crap.

I would like to suggest that everyone takes anything personal they have to say about Tek and PM him. Get the BS off the boards, and stop feeding the troll.

BGDrew · Post by **BGDrew** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:02 am

For f*ck's sake people. LET IT GO! Good lord, when did this board start looking like a kindergartener's playground at recess?

If you don't want to talk about OSU crap, don't. If it's on the right forum it's perfectly acceptable and you should drop it.

You shouldn't talk sh*t about BGSU on a BGSU message board. That alone would get you banned if I was the admin, but luckily we have someone who dedicates a lot of time and money to keep the site running who is a much better man than I.

Can we start acting like adults or should I crack out the Kool-Aid?

Falcon30 · Post by **Falcon30** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:11 am

BGDrew wrote:You shouldn't talk sh*t about BGSU on a BGSU message board. That alone would get you banned if I was the admin, but luckily we have someone who dedicates a lot of time and money to keep the site running.

Why are these two points related?

He SHOULD be banned. He has made it clear (and stated publicly) that all he wants to do is "hijack" threads. Why is the dedication of someone to allow this a good thing?

It isn't totally the fault of the people who respond. As a former moderator of a MAC board, I know you can't over moderate, but at least take a stand against this SOB intentionally trying to 'ruin' and 'hijack' this board as he has publicly stated repeatedly. This endless circle jerk of people telling other people how to not respond to an instigator is as big a part of the problem as anything and is resolved by banning the instigator.

Why not ban him? He has publicly stated he isn't in this for the right reasons. Why do we have to pussy-foot around and not ban his a$$? Why must the masses have to police ourselves when the moderators could end this easily? There is no good reason to keep him here. PERIOD.

Falcon30 · Post by **Falcon30** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 12:23 am

AND - if it is OK for him to post his crap here, then it is OK for everyone to respond to him here as well.

h2oville rocket · Post by **h2oville rocket** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:35 am

I think he's cute.

transfer2BGSU · Post by **transfer2BGSU** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:54 am

h2oville rocket wrote:I think he's cute.

You only say that because you're in love with his orange BGSU shorts

bgsuman · Post by **bgsuman** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 1:30 pm

Falcon30 wrote:
BGDrew wrote:You shouldn't talk sh*t about BGSU on a BGSU message board. That alone would get you banned if I was the admin, but luckily we have someone who dedicates a lot of time and money to keep the site running.
Why are these two points related?

He SHOULD be banned. He has made it clear (and stated publicly) that all he wants to do is "hijack" threads. Why is the dedication of someone to allow this a good thing?

It isn't totally the fault of the people who respond. As a former moderator of a MAC board, I know you can't over moderate, but at least take a stand against this SOB intentionally trying to 'ruin' and 'hijack' this board as he has publicly stated repeatedly. This endless circle jerk of people telling other people how to not respond to an instigator is as big a part of the problem as anything and is resolved by banning the instigator.

Why not ban him? He has publicly stated he isn't in this for the right reasons. Why do we have to pussy-foot around and not ban his a$$? Why must the masses have to police ourselves when the moderators could end this easily? There is no good reason to keep him here. PERIOD.

meltdown?

tekekini · Post by **tekekini** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:19 pm

bgsuman wrote:
Falcon30 wrote:
BGDrew wrote:You shouldn't talk sh*t about BGSU on a BGSU message board. That alone would get you banned if I was the admin, but luckily we have someone who dedicates a lot of time and money to keep the site running.
Why are these two points related?

He SHOULD be banned. He has made it clear (and stated publicly) that all he wants to do is "hijack" threads. Why is the dedication of someone to allow this a good thing?

It isn't totally the fault of the people who respond. As a former moderator of a MAC board, I know you can't over moderate, but at least take a stand against this SOB intentionally trying to 'ruin' and 'hijack' this board as he has publicly stated repeatedly. This endless circle jerk of people telling other people how to not respond to an instigator is as big a part of the problem as anything and is resolved by banning the instigator.

Why not ban him? He has publicly stated he isn't in this for the right reasons. Why do we have to pussy-foot around and not ban his a$$? Why must the masses have to police ourselves when the moderators could end this easily? There is no good reason to keep him here. PERIOD.
meltdown?

hahaha I love it!!! yea man having a meltdown???

Speaking of which. this pansy comes in and sends me PM's trying to pick a fight with me over a private message on a sports message board??

talk about hypocracy!!

I never picked a fight with anyone but if he thinks sending me PMs will keep the BS off of the board, then I will respond to them with a brand new thread for each one that I receive.

If I am banned, I will create new names.

It is simple.