Bleeding Orange wrote:Take it in. Take it aaaaall in.MACMAN wrote:Its change that is bad, its bad gay changes that are bad. See if it were it legal I would kill this new logo at ever turn...i think #6's in a 3" would do just fine...esp since this new falcon has no back bone. that if I killed it, it would be dead, and gone....but the only people who can kill it are the TOTAL MORONS in the MArketing DEPT and the AD....its just bad...I dont care what font you use with it, its just bad, and bad is as bad does. Our old logo was fine...coke is fine..but they dont change Original Coke...no they add other flavors becasue to remove original coke would be...well dumb comes to mind.
The white house is old...when is the Gov going to build a new on...at this point I am thinking a yellow one might do well...we could even put a bad as frown on Abe ....
point is when you have something that is perfect!
you do not just wilily nilly change it...you add to it, make other offering, but you dont change.
That is all.
Now if want to change our mascot to something els more suited to our region than a falcon I can see that...we could easily be the BG EAGLES, or the BG GEESE, or the BG SWAMPMEN, OR the BG DITCH DIGGERS, or the BG SWAMP RATS, or the BG INDIANS, or THE BG HAWKS, or the BG VULCHERS, or the BG pigons, or the BG BUCKS. THE BG ringnecks...or rednecks.
Now that is GAY




