FUTURE football schedules

bgbrandon · Post by **bgbrandon** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:30 pm

Sorry to get ahead of the Toledo game but I was looking at this website http://www.inside99.net/NCAA/future_sch ... future.htm and it says we play michigan and wyoming next year? I thought we played boise st. and wischokesin?

BGSUSynchroSk8r2006 · Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:34 pm

Terrific.

Don't let the sarcasm smack you between the eyes.

Although Michigan is overrated and not as good as Oklahoma, and we threatened pretty heavily at times there!

bgbrandon · Post by **bgbrandon** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:39 pm

BGSUSynchroSk8r2006 wrote:Terrific.

Don't let the sarcasm smack you between the eyes.

Although Michigan is overrated and not as good as Oklahoma, and we threatened pretty heavily at times there!

im confused at what youre trying to say?

BGSUSynchroSk8r2006 · Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:00 pm

I'm saying it sucks because it could be a loss right off the bat. But I'm also saying it might not be a loss necessarily since Michigan isn't as good as Oklahoma and we did well against them.

orangeandbrown · Post by **orangeandbrown** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:04 pm

Those schedules are way out of date. We dropped Michigan to get Wisconsin.

Dayons_Den · Post by **Dayons_Den** » Sat Nov 13, 2004 11:46 pm

This Michigan game thing needs to be put in the FAQ section. . .

orangeandbrown · Post by **orangeandbrown** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 11:33 am

Here's a little hint to the people of the Internet Revolution. Not everything you see on a website is true.

kdog27 · Post by **kdog27** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:29 pm

orangeandbrown wrote:Here's a little hint to the people of the Internet Revolution. Not everything you see on a website is true.

Metz · Post by **Metz** » Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:36 pm

BGSUSynchroSk8r2006 wrote:I'm saying it sucks because it could be a loss right off the bat. But I'm also saying it might not be a loss necessarily since Michigan isn't as good as Oklahoma and we did well against them.

Even though the whole us playing Michigan is not going to happen, I disagree with what you said. Michigan is AS good as Oklahoma if not better. Michigan has better receivers, Oklahoma has a better QB, both hae amazing freshmen RB's, and Michigan's special teams are better. The only reasons I would ever say Oklahoma is better are that Michigan's secondary looks a little sloppy sometimes and is inconsistent from game to game and Oklahoma has one heck of a defense. Play them together this year and it would be one hell of a game.

bgbill · Post by **bgbill** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 11:38 am

these schedules don't always agree when cross referenced - compare Bowling Green to Michigan.
But check out Wisconsin, esp. 2006!
http://www.nationalchamps.net/NCAA/futu ... s_home.htm

NWLB · Post by **NWLB** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:36 pm

UK Peregrine · Post by **UK Peregrine** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 4:28 pm

When in doubt, consult BGSU's website. Here's the old article about our 2005 & 06 OOC schedule.

BGSU's schedule for the 2005 season will include games at Wisconsin (Sept 3), at Boise State (Sept 17) and home against Temple (Oct 1). The 2006 schedule will include games with Wisconsin (at Cleveland Browns Stadium on Sept. 2) and Boise State (Sept 23).

http://bgsufalcons.collegesports.com/sp ... 04aaa.html

Post by **ZiggyZoomba** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 4:38 pm

orangeandbrown wrote:Here's a little hint to the people of the Internet Revolution. Not everything you see on a website is true.

Unless, of course, you're talking about THIS website.

orangeandbrown · Post by **orangeandbrown** » Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:19 pm

ZiggyZoomba wrote:
orangeandbrown wrote:Here's a little hint to the people of the Internet Revolution. Not everything you see on a website is true.
Unless, of course, you're talking about THIS website.

I stand corrected.

FUTURE football schedules

FUTURE football schedules

The Omnibus Beat Toledo Thread.