Civil Suit

hockeymom · Post by **hockeymom** » Sat May 05, 2007 7:51 am

i believe this is true. heard about it in the makings a month or so ago. hope something becomes of it. this man is no coach. he has no people skills and rattling his feathers might do us all some good.

Rightupinthere · Post by **Rightupinthere** » Sat May 05, 2007 10:18 am

hockeymom wrote:i believe this is true. heard about it in the makings a month or so ago. hope something becomes of it. this man is no coach. he has no people skills and rattling his feathers might do us all some good.

Ladies and gentlemen, sock puppet #2,398.

Welcome, helicopter parent.

bulldog85 · Post by **bulldog85** » Sat May 05, 2007 10:25 am

While I have no faith in Paluch, I don't accept spurious charges. As in party politics it seems to me that the "accusation" even if it is fiction is more important than the facts. At the college level the Duke case is an example; bogus claims resulted in lives being trashed and families having to pay huge sums of money to protect themselves.

Lets wait for the facts.

jacojdm · Post by **jacojdm** » Sat May 05, 2007 10:39 am

MACMAN wrote:racism is gay and I have zero tolerance for it.

What?

pugeleemugelee · Post by **pugeleemugelee** » Sat May 05, 2007 4:57 pm

What kind of civil suit?
Or is it a civil rights suit?

MACMAN · Post by **MACMAN** » Sun May 06, 2007 10:52 am

Ill wait to read the alleged allegations, I highly doubt it will amount to anything, and is more than yet whiner on the attack, trying to undermine the team again.
I look at this f sceptically Just as I saw the duke crap. It is a civil case however and not much at all needs be done win a civil suit, as plantifs are 7 times more likely to be awarded damages in a civil case than criminal, or small claims.
and the pc crapola world we live in I can see damages being awarded because a coach was hard on a lazy player. Who knows maybe coaches will take lazy players to court next for not working hard....
cant wait to read the brief on this one to see whats what.

hockeymom · Post by **hockeymom** » Sun May 06, 2007 1:22 pm

rightupinthere, what is your comment supposed to mean? seriously, you know nothing about me and i take offense to your unfair categorization.

It's the Journey... · Post by **It's the Journey...** » Sun May 06, 2007 1:26 pm

If you go back and read many of the threads here you will understand the comments. Welcome to the board if you haven't been yet.

Rightupinthere · Post by **Rightupinthere** » Sun May 06, 2007 5:47 pm

hockeymom wrote:rightupinthere, what is your comment supposed to mean? seriously, you know nothing about me and i take offense to your unfair categorization.

Cry me a river. First posters which have negative comments about the current coach - especially with the handle of "hockeymom" are easily categorized. In other words, you're guilty until proved innocent. It didn't always used to be this way. Call me a cynic.

Read the history of this forum, then get back to me. Okay, helio-mom?

hockey fan · Post by **hockey fan** » Sun May 06, 2007 7:44 pm

It kind of sounds like there really might be something afoot, but it is extremely unsatisfying to not have a definitive source on this.

Has there really been nothing in that beacon of truth we call The Sentinel. Common Gordo. Get that big butt in motion and enlighten us.

kmabgsu · Post by **kmabgsu** » Sun May 06, 2007 8:26 pm

will the real culprit please divulge yourself so that everyone can stop speculating already

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Mon May 07, 2007 12:28 am

I never thought the insanity of this particular forum could reach another lever. It has. And yet, I'm not shocked.

Puckhead · Post by **Puckhead** » Mon May 07, 2007 7:05 am

RE: HockeyMom
Don't you think that you can cut the lady some slack.
She has been going to 6:00 am practices for 15 years, for that alone she deserves a little love and respect.
She probably has some inside information. Sounds like she wants what is best for the team.
Allow us to not rush to judgement, let us wait until we hear the rest of the story from Gordy,
and then take the "facts" with a grain of salt.

JoeFalcon · Post by **JoeFalcon** » Mon May 07, 2007 8:26 am

Did he use the phrase "Shaggy-haired Canuck?"

Rightupinthere · Post by **Rightupinthere** » Mon May 07, 2007 8:32 am

Puckhead wrote:RE: HockeyMom
Don't you think that you can cut the lady some slack.
She has been going to 6:00 am practices for 15 years, for that alone she deserves a little love and respect.

Riiiiiiiiight.

I'm a mod. I see wonderful things behind the scenes. It's interesting how ip addresses can be crossed referenced with usernames, no?

BO's insanity description for this forum is quite precise.

I'm about a hair's breath away from having Grant pull this forum. It's just some strange bully pulpit for prior players to air their grievances about a coach.

That is not the intent of this forum nor it is the intent of AZZ.com. I really miss talking about HOCKEY and not soap operas and vaginal itching.

Got a problem with my snarky attitude? It isn't my normal disposition. Look to other posts for proof of that. My attitude on this forum was created.

Civil Suit

civil suit

Re: civil suit

Wait for the facts.