BENCH SHEEHAN! START GLAUD!!

jacojdm · Post by **jacojdm** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:42 pm

Typed with tongue firmly in cheek. I figured we could make a mockery before someone actually tries to suggest this.

Falcon137 · Post by **Falcon137** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 3:06 pm

I thought Glaud came in and did a nice job with the 2s vs 2s something positive at least....

Schadenfreude · Post by **Schadenfreude** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 3:27 pm

Falcon137 wrote:I thought Glaud came in and did a nice job with the 2s vs 2s something positive at least....

Yes. He did.

Coach pulled Tyler at the right time. Not too soon. Not too late.

BGSUFootballFan · Post by **BGSUFootballFan** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 3:59 pm

Better yet, run the Glaud play calls with TS in the game.

zeket10 · Post by **zeket10** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 6:30 pm

It looked like Tyler was desperate to prove he could come back out there and throw a TD after a mistake. Each time though he would make a poor decision and throw the ball in a congested area

JoeFalcon · Post by **JoeFalcon** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 6:57 pm

Let's hope this doesn't hurt the kid's confidence for the rest of the season. The best thing to do is burn this tape and move on.

He's got that Brett Favre gunslinger mentality, but today was more like the 2006 version than the 1996 version.

zeket10 · Post by **zeket10** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:50 pm

BGSUFootballFan wrote:Better yet, run the Glaud play calls with TS in the game.

Glaud threw some good balls, but I was wondering if AT would ever get some throws? I saw that 4 yard run at RB

that was pretty funny seeing a QB at tailback.

Peregrinner · Post by **Peregrinner** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:50 pm

Yeah, Tyler's performance was disappointing, but I think it was just a snowball type deal. He had a mistake, then had another, and his confidence started to fade.

I was happy with Glaud's performance with the #2s, especially the fact that it seemed like suddenly we started rushing Bullock a lot more often.

The only other offensive thing I was disappointed in was the use of AT. I'm sorry, but he's just not getting it done on those 3rd-and-1 type plays (most of the time). He could have had a 1st down early in the game if he'd just turned up field, but had his eyes on the endzone and ended up a yard and some change behind the marker. I know it doesn't mean much in the long-run, but still. I think he has a lot of talent, but something's just not clicking there.

If it weren't for the risk of injury, I'd say line up Freddie Barnes for that play instead. He's money on that play.

BGSUFootballFan · Post by **BGSUFootballFan** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 7:56 pm

AT runs like he wish he was the starting QB. I hate how we used him today. In theory it should work, but you can tell his heart isn't into it so we need to find something else for him to do. You certainly can't blame the kid for being disappointed though. Especially after TS laid an egg today.

To repeat my point early, call the same mix of runs and passes that we do with Glaud when Sheehan is in the game! As soon as Glaud game in we started mixing up the play calling really well and the whole attitude of the team changed. Macon was running with his hair on fire, Keston was soaring in the air to catch the ball, man that was fun to watch! Lets run those type of plays as our main offense!

BGSUVA · Post by **BGSUVA** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 8:06 pm

its like our own little Grossman.

zeket10 · Post by **zeket10** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:26 pm

It's amazing how I am reading that AT should get a new role, because he didn't get 1 yard cause the O-Line didn't block well that play. On top of that everyone in the stadium knows what play they are running when Anthony Turner lines up as a QB. Then you look at Sheehan and all the picks he threw with no D-lineman in his face. Are you serious? I know they need to rethink the way they are calling every offensive play expecialy on 3rd down.

BGGrad01 · Post by **BGGrad01** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:36 pm

zeket10 wrote:It's amazing how I am reading that AT should get a new role, because he didn't get 1 yard cause the O-Line didn't block well that play.

Watch the replay and I think that you will see the O-line did a sufficient job to allow AT to get 1 yard. The play was a designed sweep to the right and AT had the first down if he would have just fallen forward. He decided to try to bounce it outside and he was knocked backwards.

zeket10 · Post by **zeket10** » Sat Oct 06, 2007 11:51 pm

Read my signature, Just kidding with you. I could be wrong it has been almost 12 hours since the game started. Knowing that I still believe that he would have took a hard hit to fall forward.