Wow...that OU loss sure was costly

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18397
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Wow...that OU loss sure was costly

Post by Flipper »

OU beat Miami today....
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
Rightupinthere
Mercenary of Churlishness
Mercenary of Churlishness
Posts: 6549
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:53 am
Location: Ye Olde Pigeon Hole

Post by Rightupinthere »

:shock: ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
"Science doesn’t know everything? Well science KNOWS it doesn’t know everything… otherwise it’d stop."
Dara O'Brian - Comedian
San Fran Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by San Fran Falcon »

I thought we wanted a Miami loss. Now, if they lose to CMU in the MACC, they're ineligible to go bowling.
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10208
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

Post by BGSU33 »

San Fran Falcon wrote:I thought we wanted a Miami loss. Now, if they lose to CMU in the MACC, they're ineligible to go bowling.
That was my thinking as well as Ohio and Miami are now 6-6. Why was this not what we wanted?
GO BG!!!
User avatar
Zom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: N. Wales, United Kingdom

Post by Zom »

You don't know how costly this could be.

This sucks.

I hate Miami more than Toledo.

Always have.

Always will.

This sucks.
Falcon137
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3246
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:24 pm

Post by Falcon137 »

I think he was talking about the loss we had to OU and was blowing our shot at the MAC East title.
San Fran Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by San Fran Falcon »

Zom wrote:You don't know how costly this could be.

This sucks.

I hate Miami more than Toledo.

Always have.

Always will.

This sucks.
Huh? I'm still confused. Could someone shed some light on why Miami losing is a bad thing? Maybe the title of this thread is misleading. The OU loss is costly to MIAMI (which is good...right?), not costly to BG.
San Fran Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 884
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by San Fran Falcon »

Falcon137 wrote:I think he was talking about the loss we had to OU and was blowing our shot at the MAC East title.
Ah, that makes sense. Pardon my temporary brain fart. :oops:
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18397
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

It's not a bad thing...our loss at home to a beatable OU squad was the bad thing. If we could have won that game we'd be in the MACC...of course the same can be said for the Miami game itself, but that was a road game.
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10208
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

Post by BGSU33 »

Flipper wrote:It's not a bad thing...our loss at home to a beatable OU squad was the bad thing. If we could have won that game we'd be in the MACC...of course the same can be said for the Miami game itself, but that was a road game.
Yeah, the Ohio game was a contest we probably should have won. That int return for a TD by their DL really did us in after we started a comeback. I would like our chances playing against either Ohio or Miami right now.
GO BG!!!
User avatar
Zom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: N. Wales, United Kingdom

Post by Zom »

San Fran Falcon wrote:Huh? I'm still confused. Could someone shed some light on why Miami losing is a bad thing?
Its a bad thing if you wanted to book a ticket to Toronto from Manchester tonight.
bgsufalcon24
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4072
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
Location: Strongsville, Ohio

Post by bgsufalcon24 »

So now its the MAC that has egg on its face again. Not only did we finish with a better overall record than Miami (8-4 to 6-6), but we finished with a better conference record as well (6-2 to 5-2). I'm not really sure you could make an argument at this point that Miami is the better team, yes we lost to them head to head, but over the whole body of work, it seems as if the best team in the MAC won't be in the championship game this season.

What a crock.
24. Quality provider of the truth, for better or for worse.
cowboyjoe
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:18 am

Post by cowboyjoe »

I've said it a million times and I will say it again. If you can't score an offensive touchdown against Akron (Miami won 7-0 on a defensive score) then you shoudn't win anything or go to any bowl. Just my two cents.
User avatar
VDub26Falcon
The Drunken Irish Falcon
The Drunken Irish Falcon
Posts: 4710
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Elyria, OH
Contact:

Post by VDub26Falcon »

cowboyjoe wrote:I've said it a million times and I will say it again. If you can't score an offensive touchdown against Akron (Miami won 7-0 on a defensive score) then you shoudn't win anything or go to any bowl. Just my two cents.
What about the theory that defense wins championships? Granted, Miami did not win any championships by beating Akron, except of course the MAC East Championship.
Be Special, Be Different, BE Bowling Green - Dino Babers
JoeFalcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1765
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 3:36 pm

Post by JoeFalcon »

It seems fair to say that Miami has regressed since their game against us while we have dramatically improved. CMU is the beneficiary because they get a wounded, shaken, struggling team to play in the MACC instead of the hottest team in the league.
Post Reply