http://tinyurl.com/yrp3zl
Looks like Stanley is definitely gone as well.
I still don't know why the LB position wasn't addressed with recruits. Instead, we sign six more DBs so we can move others to different positions. Makes no sense.

Warthog wrote:We've moved two more DB's to LB. Can you believe it?![]()
http://tinyurl.com/yrp3zl
Looks like Stanley is definitely gone as well.
I still don't know why the LB position wasn't addressed with recruits. Instead, we sign six more DBs so we can move others to different positions. Makes no sense.
I'd like to see more beef at the LB position as well, but I wouldn't automatically assume it's going to get worse.Falconboy wrote: You know the pathetic run defense we've seen out of the past 4-5 years and the poor tackling by our linebackers? Prepare to see even worse of the same. Unbelievable.

No, you've got that backwards. Our pass defense was only good because teams elected not to pass against us. Our run defense was a weakness, so other teams correctly gameplanned to run the ball against us. Just like they elected to throw against Miami, because hey, their run defense is pretty good. Teams will continue to run at us until our run-stopping gets better. THEN we'll see if our pass defense is any good or not. I'm convinced that teams could throw all day on Antonio Smith if they wanted to, he gets burned at least once a game. Kenny Lewis, although he forces turnovers, isn't that much better at coverage. Really PJ Mahone is the only guy I feel really good about in our secondary.JoeFalcon wrote:The run defense numbers are a bit inflated anyway considering we were #2 in the conference in pass defense. MAC opponents rushed the ball 361 times against BG, more than anyone else in the league, compared to only 240 times against the leader in rush defense, Miami.Falconboy wrote: You know the pathetic run defense we've seen out of the past 4-5 years and the poor tackling by our linebackers? Prepare to see even worse of the same. Unbelievable.

Yes, those guys are all talented. But I don't understand why someone has to move to LB and be undersized. Why don't we just make the nickel package our base defense and have these guys out there in the secondary. Run a 3-3-5 or 4-2-5, something like that. If DB is where the talent is, but more of them on the field and force the offense to adjust based on what we are doing on defense.able1 wrote:This gets Mahone, Brown, and Sanderson on the field at the same time. I'm all for it.


What position changes were you not fond of?able1 wrote:This gets Mahone, Brown, and Sanderson on the field at the same time. I'm all for it. I haven't been overly fond of alot of the position changes in the past, but I think this one makes more sense.
Too bad about Stanley. He really came in and played well last year.

I think we run a 4-3 in name only. I believe that Briggs doesnt always play with his hand down and the SLB is basically a strong safety. So its 3-3-5 or 4-2-5 like you said.Warthog wrote:Yes, those guys are all talented. But I don't understand why someone has to move to LB and be undersized. Why don't we just make the nickel package our base defense and have these guys out there in the secondary. Run a 3-3-5 or 4-2-5, something like that. If DB is where the talent is, but more of them on the field and force the offense to adjust based on what we are doing on defense.able1 wrote:This gets Mahone, Brown, and Sanderson on the field at the same time. I'm all for it.
Okaaaay. And the fact that Heidi Klum was on the cover of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition doesn't necessarily mean she's hot. If opposing coaches thought Antonio Smith and our other corners were as bad as you think they are, they'd attack them constantly and he'd be getting burned a lot more than once a game.bgsufalcon24 wrote: So no, our 2nd ranked pass defense doesn't necessarily mean our secondary is good at defending the pass.

The offensive line I'm sure will be fine. We've done some good recruiting there, and although they might take some time to gel, it won't be a bad unit by any stretch.JoeFalcon wrote:Okaaaay. And the fact that Heidi Klum was on the cover of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition doesn't necessarily mean she's hot. If opposing coaches thought Antonio Smith and our other corners were as bad as you think they are, they'd attack them constantly and he'd be getting burned a lot more than once a game.bgsufalcon24 wrote: So no, our 2nd ranked pass defense doesn't necessarily mean our secondary is good at defending the pass.
We didn't lose to Miami and Tulsa soley because of pourous pass defense. We lost the Miami and Tulsa games because we were outplayed in every single facet of the game, pass defense included.
If you're this hypercritical of a unit that ranked second in the conference and has every returning starter back next year, I shutter at what you must think of, say, the offensive line.
Our passing defense looked good statistically solely because our rush defense was putrid. That is the only reason period. We didn't have a pass rush and our secondary generally sucks by letting off a ton of big plays. I don't care how long those guys have been starting they're not good.JoeFalcon wrote:Okaaaay. And the fact that Heidi Klum was on the cover of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition doesn't necessarily mean she's hot. If opposing coaches thought Antonio Smith and our other corners were as bad as you think they are, they'd attack them constantly and he'd be getting burned a lot more than once a game.bgsufalcon24 wrote: So no, our 2nd ranked pass defense doesn't necessarily mean our secondary is good at defending the pass.
We didn't lose to Miami and Tulsa soley because of pourous pass defense. We lost the Miami and Tulsa games because we were outplayed in every single facet of the game, pass defense included.
If you're this hypercritical of a unit that ranked second in the conference and has every returning starter back next year, I shutter at what you must think of, say, the offensive line.