It's Game Week....let the predictions roll

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
Zom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: N. Wales, United Kingdom

Post by Zom »

The game is a Terry Pratchett spectacular, and turns on Bowling Green being awarded a field goal opportunity after a game official mispronounces Vr.., uh Vir..., oh yeah, Vrvilo's name.

BGSU.. 42
Pitt...0
User avatar
bgmaggot00
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1186
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:38 am
Location: Lawrence, KS

Post by bgmaggot00 »

Pitt: 42
BG: 27
Radioactive Falcon
Egg
Egg
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 9:15 pm

Post by Radioactive Falcon »

Quote To Note: “It’s time to hit somebody else. The kids are hungry. It was a tough training camp. Last week was very physical in some extremely hot weather and everybody is a little fired up right now, ready to whack somebody else.”—BG head coach Gregg Brandon said.


My prediction? 28 BG, 24 PITT
User avatar
Jacobs4Heisman
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Aliquippa, PA

Post by Jacobs4Heisman »

Team comes out flat - 35-14 Pitt.
Roll Along!
BGfootballfan
Chick
Chick
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:05 am

Post by BGfootballfan »

Unfortunately

PITT 42
BGSU 14
bgsufalcon24
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4072
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 1:46 pm
Location: Strongsville, Ohio

Post by bgsufalcon24 »

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Team comes out flat - 35-14 Pitt.
That's the type of prediction I'd expect from a Pittsburgh fan. :lol:
24. Quality provider of the truth, for better or for worse.
User avatar
cph2133
Chick
Chick
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:09 pm

Post by cph2133 »

Close but no cigar..I see it similar to the BC game last year, where it is going to be close, but a ton of mistakes (see Tulsa game) will result in a 35-14 game or something like that
User avatar
Jacobs4Heisman
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
a.k.a. Capt. Rex Kramer
Posts: 7889
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Aliquippa, PA

Post by Jacobs4Heisman »

bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Team comes out flat - 35-14 Pitt.
That's the type of prediction I'd expect from a Pittsburgh fan. :lol:
:-D

I hate the university of Pitt though, so I'd love nothing more than to whoop the s**t out of them on their own turf. However, we were underdogs before all the recent distractions and player losses. I just don't think we can overcome all that to pull this off.
Roll Along!
Falconboy
John Lovett's Successor
John Lovett's Successor
Posts: 5357
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Columbus
Contact:

Post by Falconboy »

Jacobs4Heisman wrote:
bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Jacobs4Heisman wrote:Team comes out flat - 35-14 Pitt.
That's the type of prediction I'd expect from a Pittsburgh fan. :lol:
:-D

I hate the university of Pitt though, so I'd love nothing more than to whoop the s**t out of them on their own turf. However, we were underdogs before all the recent distractions and player losses. I just don't think we can overcome all that to pull this off.
As JH4 has surmised, I don't see us winning and now its dangerously looking more like a minor blowout now after losing Geter than before. We just became a whole lot more predictable with Geter gone. The Pitt coaches will know whats coming when Bullock is in there strictly because it seems evident that Bullock has not the hands to be a receiver so when he comes in you will never him move around , split out wide or anything like that. When Pitt sees Bullock we won't be fooling anyone. Our only hope is to put Mr. AT back at RB with his multitude of skills to keep the Pitt D honest.
Mid-2000's Anderson Animal
Post Reply