TOLEDO!!!

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
rocketfootball
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Why?

Post by rocketfootball »

Falcon Fanatic wrote: Way to Numnutz, be that strong disciplinarian and tough coach!!! At least our credit card kids got suspended for a WHOLE game!! :-D
Why do you guys even make comments like that? What about the times on here when someone did something wrong at BG and didn't get any kind of suspension and some fans on here were upset about it?

What about this scenario:

Neither Moore nor Alexandre have been charged with anything. One was arrested for disorderly conduct and the other for impeding an investigation. Take into consideration Charles Sharon. He was a suspect for robbery. He was questioned by the police on more than one occasion. He also was required to go to the BG police station and give a sample of his hair for DNA testing about 48 hours before a football game against Ball State. He received no discipline whatsoever.

My guess would be because he was never charged with anything and Brandon felt it best to let authorities handle the situation and if there was ever a charge he would take action. In Moore and Alexandre, neither have been charged with anything and Amstutz has given a very light discipline of not starting, as well as some internal disciplinary action that the public won't hear about or notice. If either Moore and/or Alexandre are later charged with anything than Amstutz would have the opportunity to take futher action/suspension just like Brandon in the Charles Sharon incident.


Still think "Numnutz" is being soft in this situation? If so, than you have to believe that Brandon has been soft before too. And I wonder compare what happened with Moore and Alexandre to the credit card deal at BG.........just like you wouldn't compare a BG player getting arrested for disorderly conduct the same as the credit card thing.

Bottomline.......be consistent with your criticisms.
rocketfootball
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Not Starting

Post by rocketfootball »

LakelandRocket wrote:I heard that they took Nick's Gameboy, and sat him in Timeout. Who will field the first kickoff? Nick didn't do too well anyway.

Your win over Pitt was bigger, but winning at the Big House was awesome!

The Michigan fans looked like their dog died.
Nick Moore does not return kickoffs, just punts.

Not starting means they will not start at their normal positions. Meaning at the very least Nick Moore will not play in the first offensive play from scrimmage for Toledo and Albertson Alexandre will not play in the first defensive play from scrimmage.
factman
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Bowling Green
Contact:

Post by factman »

Maybe you are the "Dumbnutz"! I think if you look back to those instances, most people on this board were complaining about not harsh enough disipline applied there also. Why would you even care what a bunch of Falcon fans think or are saying on the Bowling Green board? If it is over on your "rent-a-board", feel free to bitch and moan all you want about us even being there.
You normally answer all of your own questions anyway, or at least keep dogging and repeating your thoughts until everyone gets tired of listening. :roll:
At least H2O comes over and adds a little humor and knowledge to this board, and you add..........................??????????
User avatar
Falcon Fanatic
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6798
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
Location: BG

Re: Why?

Post by Falcon Fanatic »

rocketfootball wrote:
Falcon Fanatic wrote: Way to Numnutz, be that strong disciplinarian and tough coach!!! At least our credit card kids got suspended for a WHOLE game!! :-D
Why do you guys even make comments like that? What about the times on here when someone did something wrong at BG and didn't get any kind of suspension and some fans on here were upset about it?

What about this scenario:

Neither Moore nor Alexandre have been charged with anything. One was arrested for disorderly conduct and the other for impeding an investigation. Take into consideration Charles Sharon. He was a suspect for robbery. He was questioned by the police on more than one occasion. He also was required to go to the BG police station and give a sample of his hair for DNA testing about 48 hours before a football game against Ball State. He received no discipline whatsoever.

My guess would be because he was never charged with anything and Brandon felt it best to let authorities handle the situation and if there was ever a charge he would take action. In Moore and Alexandre, neither have been charged with anything and Amstutz has given a very light discipline of not starting, as well as some internal disciplinary action that the public won't hear about or notice. If either Moore and/or Alexandre are later charged with anything than Amstutz would have the opportunity to take futher action/suspension just like Brandon in the Charles Sharon incident.


Still think "Numnutz" is being soft in this situation? If so, than you have to believe that Brandon has been soft before too. And I wonder compare what happened with Moore and Alexandre to the credit card deal at BG.........just like you wouldn't compare a BG player getting arrested for disorderly conduct the same as the credit card thing.

Bottomline.......be consistent with your criticisms.
Apparenty you missed the SMILEY :-D FACE at the end of the post. :roll: I was being sarcastic!!! Sheesh... #-o
"Regarding BGSU, I would think their biggest strength is that they never give up, They never slow down and they battle hard even after the other team scores. We have to be on our game and never, ever take the foot off the gas for a second."
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18325
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

RF... You keep referring to the "Charles SHaron incident" as if it were a proven fact that Charles was involved in some type of criminal actitivity here. The fact of the matter is that he wasn't charged with anything was he?

You continue to lie about this topic to score points in a debate about college football. Are you really that pathetic?

Get a life...
h2oville rocket
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6691
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
Location: Waterville, ohio

Post by h2oville rocket »

factman wrote: At least H2O comes over and adds a little humor and knowledge to this board, and you add..........................??????????
FACTMAN!! You LIKE me! :smt007
User avatar
Falcon Fanatic
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6798
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
Location: BG

Post by Falcon Fanatic »

h2oville rocket wrote:
factman wrote: At least H2O comes over and adds a little humor and knowledge to this board, and you add..........................??????????
FACTMAN!! You LIKE me! :smt007
:ROFL:
"Regarding BGSU, I would think their biggest strength is that they never give up, They never slow down and they battle hard even after the other team scores. We have to be on our game and never, ever take the foot off the gas for a second."
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
factman
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Bowling Green
Contact:

Post by factman »

[-X :wink:
User avatar
Redwingtom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5251
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:16 pm

Post by Redwingtom »

Flipper wrote:RF... You keep referring to the "Charles SHaron incident" as if it were a proven fact that Charles was involved in some type of criminal actitivity here. The fact of the matter is that he wasn't charged with anything was he?

You continue to lie about this topic to score points in a debate about college football. Are you really that pathetic?

Get a life...
RF is starting to sound like McCain getting Bin Laden on this Sharon incident. He knows how to convict him but won't tell anyone how to do it! ;-)
Redwingtom
rocketfootball
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rocketfootball »

factman wrote:Maybe you are the "Dumbnutz"! I think if you look back to those instances, most people on this board were complaining about not harsh enough disipline applied there also. Why would you even care what a bunch of Falcon fans think or are saying on the Bowling Green board? If it is over on your "rent-a-board", feel free to bitch and moan all you want about us even being there.
You normally answer all of your own questions anyway, or at least keep dogging and repeating your thoughts until everyone gets tired of listening. :roll:
At least H2O comes over and adds a little humor and knowledge to this board, and you add..........................??????????

Nice, calling me names. I did say that many on this board didn't think there was enough criticism. Read my post again. Oh, and I was talking to the person I quoted, not the majority of the BG board.

Try to keep up factman.
rocketfootball
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rocketfootball »

Flipper wrote:RF... You keep referring to the "Charles SHaron incident" as if it were a proven fact that Charles was involved in some type of criminal actitivity here. The fact of the matter is that he wasn't charged with anything was he?

You continue to lie about this topic to score points in a debate about college football. Are you really that pathetic?

Get a life...

I may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but nowhere in my post about the Sharon incident did I say he was indeed involved in criminal activity. I did not lie at all and only gave facts....AND I SAID HE WAS NEVER CHARGED. I even said that Brandon probably did not do any discipline because he wanted to wait and see if any charges came out, which didn't. It could very easily be taken from my post that I even agree with Brandon's decision to not discipline him since he was never charged with anything.

What I did say was to the one post that called Amstutz for very little discipline to two players that have not been charged for anything and brought up the Sharon thing to show him a comparison. I am sure he doesn't believe that Sharon should have been disciplined because he wasn't charged with anything.......and to be consistent this post would need to feel the same way about the recent UT incident.


All of you need to stop thinking I am just coming here to post negatively. I have not put down Brandon, Sharon, BGSU, or BG fans as a whole......yet you guys are acting like I have in my posts. Please read my posts more carefully and don't just assume that I am going to be negative.
rocketfootball
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: Why?

Post by rocketfootball »

Falcon Fanatic wrote:
rocketfootball wrote:
Falcon Fanatic wrote: Way to Numnutz, be that strong disciplinarian and tough coach!!! At least our credit card kids got suspended for a WHOLE game!! :-D
Why do you guys even make comments like that? What about the times on here when someone did something wrong at BG and didn't get any kind of suspension and some fans on here were upset about it?

What about this scenario:

Neither Moore nor Alexandre have been charged with anything. One was arrested for disorderly conduct and the other for impeding an investigation. Take into consideration Charles Sharon. He was a suspect for robbery. He was questioned by the police on more than one occasion. He also was required to go to the BG police station and give a sample of his hair for DNA testing about 48 hours before a football game against Ball State. He received no discipline whatsoever.

My guess would be because he was never charged with anything and Brandon felt it best to let authorities handle the situation and if there was ever a charge he would take action. In Moore and Alexandre, neither have been charged with anything and Amstutz has given a very light discipline of not starting, as well as some internal disciplinary action that the public won't hear about or notice. If either Moore and/or Alexandre are later charged with anything than Amstutz would have the opportunity to take futher action/suspension just like Brandon in the Charles Sharon incident.


Still think "Numnutz" is being soft in this situation? If so, than you have to believe that Brandon has been soft before too. And I wonder compare what happened with Moore and Alexandre to the credit card deal at BG.........just like you wouldn't compare a BG player getting arrested for disorderly conduct the same as the credit card thing.

Bottomline.......be consistent with your criticisms.
Apparenty you missed the SMILEY :-D FACE at the end of the post. :roll: I was being sarcastic!!! Sheesh... #-o

I apologize if I took your post wrong. I am used to BG fans bashing Amstutz for weak punishment, and I shouldn't have assumed if I did. I'm also not sure that I even saw or paid attention to the emoticon. Sometimes they don't even load on this computer and I just see a red x and don't know what exactly was posted.
rocketfootball
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 758
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:04 pm

Post by rocketfootball »

Redwingtom wrote:
Flipper wrote:RF... You keep referring to the "Charles SHaron incident" as if it were a proven fact that Charles was involved in some type of criminal actitivity here. The fact of the matter is that he wasn't charged with anything was he?

You continue to lie about this topic to score points in a debate about college football. Are you really that pathetic?

Get a life...
RF is starting to sound like McCain getting Bin Laden on this Sharon incident. He knows how to convict him but won't tell anyone how to do it! ;-)
Please explain where I said anywhere in this thread that Sharon did anything wrong or should be convicted of something. This is the first time I have probably brought Charles Sharon up in any way in a year or more as well.

Show me proof from this thread that I accused Sharon of anything that is not already true and I will apologize and kiss your feet.
Post Reply