BG vs UD....

Falconboy · Post by **Falconboy** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:16 pm

BG up 36-13 early in the 2nd half.

Detroit must be bad.

svillefalcon · Post by **svillefalcon** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:07 pm

I also think we're taking out some early season frustrations of not playing at home at all and losing some close games against good teams.

GO FALCONS!

Falcon137 · Post by **Falcon137** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:24 pm

Falconboy wrote:BG up 36-13 early in the 2nd half. Detroit must be bad.

2-6 after today.

I remember when UDM used to be good....

factman · Post by **factman** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:29 pm

It was UGLY but a good win by 20! That team beat the scuds by FIFTEEN!!!

Falcon137 · Post by **Falcon137** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 8:32 pm

factman wrote:It was UGLY but a good win by 20! That team beat the scuds by FIFTEEN!!!

Beat who by 15?

They have 2 wins; beat SLU by 5 and EMU by 15.

transfer2BGSU · Post by **transfer2BGSU** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:05 pm

Detroit was without their leading scorer. And I do not think their big man is really 7-3.

factman · Post by **factman** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:26 pm

I got bad info..........wrong UT!!

hammb · Post by **hammb** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 9:34 pm

transfer2BGSU wrote:Detroit was without their leading scorer. And I do not think their big man is really 7-3.

Probably not 7-3, but definitely a few inches taller than Polk/Larson.

Detroit played absolutely terribly. Our offense looked completely lost at times, but we put up a good effort on defense. It's a good win, but it was an ugly ass game.

BleedOrange · Post by **BleedOrange** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:19 pm

hammb wrote:
transfer2BGSU wrote:Detroit was without their leading scorer. And I do not think their big man is really 7-3.
Probably not 7-3, but definitely a few inches taller than Polk/Larson.

Detroit played absolutely terribly. Our offense looked completely lost at times, but we put up a good effort on defense. It's a good win, but it was an ugly ass game.

My take is a little different. I thought our defensive effort was outstanding. At times, it seemed like there were 6 or 7 white jerseys out there. Our halfcourt defense was stifling and it seemed like we got a hand on the ball every time Detroit got in the half court. They could not get any offensive continuity. They got very few clean looks. Nothing uncontested. They didn't breach the 20 point mark until 12:55 in the second half. Marcshall and Larson in particular played tough, low post position D. If we can keep up that kind of defensive intensity, we'll be in the hunt for the MAC East.

They had a small defender on Jakubowski. He was a very effective on-the-ball defender and he forced turnovers and bad decisions out of Jak. They had Brown looking bad for a stretch out there as well.

You know, I think that Detroit center might have been 7-3. He was at least 7-1. He towered over Polk.

Ryan Autullo · Post by **Ryan Autullo** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:44 pm

hammb wrote:
transfer2BGSU wrote:Detroit was without their leading scorer. And I do not think their big man is really 7-3.
Probably not 7-3, but definitely a few inches taller than Polk/Larson.

Detroit played absolutely terribly. Our offense looked completely lost at times, but we put up a good effort on defense. It's a good win, but it was an ugly ass game.

By comparison, last year's BG spring football game was Citizen Kane.

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 11:48 pm

And the football banquet was "Gone With the Wind"...

Zig · Post by **Zig** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:07 am

Detroit's shooting (besides free throws) was absolutely terrible for most of the game. Especially the first half. Our defense was great, but I wouldn't say that they were the only reason Detroit was scoring so low.

Free throws seemed to be a problem though. Detroit moved up the ladder quickly because they made them, and we fell down the ladder quickly because we missed quite a few. What I think was a 20+ point quickly shrunk down in the 2nd half because we couldn't capitalize on them.

FMBfan07 · Post by **FMBfan07** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 12:30 am

Man karaffa was so close to getting some points! next game!

TG1996 · Post by **TG1996** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:13 am

Wow. The lowest point total by an opponent in 44 years. Whether it was because of our defense or despite it, that's pretty impressive! GO BG!

http://bgsufalcons.cstv.com/sports/m-ba ... 08aaa.html

hammb · Post by **hammb** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:34 am

TG1996 wrote:Wow. The lowest point total by an opponent in 44 years. Whether it was because of our defense or despite it, that's pretty impressive! GO BG!

http://bgsufalcons.cstv.com/sports/m-ba ... 08aaa.html

Wow. For a long time I wasn't sure they were going to get to 30. We played great defense.

Our offense needs some serious work. We still do not have a guard that shows the ability to consistently get the ball to our bigs when they're in good position. Our guys were getting where they wanted on the block a lot last night but the guards could not get the ball into them.

When Detroit went to a zone I really have no idea what our offensive philosophy was. We didn't do anything to really attack the zone at all. We scored some points and took them out of it, but that was by Clements & B-Mo making long three pointers. It's been years since I can remember seeing a BG team actually attack a zone defense and get good looks.

Whether or good defense or atrocious play by Detroit (personally I think it was a combo of the two) the game was not a pretty one. Oh, I especially liked the time they gave Miller 3 tries to hit the front end of a one-and-one (back to back lane violations) and not only did he miss all 3, but they actually got progressively worse. It has to be mental with him at this point, it was brutal.

BG vs UD....

BG vs UD....

Re: BG vs UD....