Note to self: Don't stand near hammb when Falcon Fanatic or BGFan are within shooting range.hammb wrote:Hockey will always be the boat anchor of the BG athletic department. It has some very die hard fans here though that will make it very tough for the university to ever think about dropping it.
Six to Ten Million in Fiscal Year '10
Note to 1987, ask hammb when wondering where the other shoe fell.1987alum wrote:Note to self: Don't stand near hammb when Falcon Fanatic or BGFan are within shooting range.hammb wrote:Hockey will always be the boat anchor of the BG athletic department. It has some very die hard fans here though that will make it very tough for the university to ever think about dropping it.
NWLB
*********************************
http://www.CruiseAficionados.com - A Community for Cruise Fans. (Try the mobile app "Cruise Aficionados)
*********************************
http://www.CruiseAficionados.com - A Community for Cruise Fans. (Try the mobile app "Cruise Aficionados)
-
h2oville rocket
- Peregrine

- Posts: 6691
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
- Location: Waterville, ohio
I don't think she'd shoot me...I thought we were good friends1987alum wrote:Note to self: Don't stand near hammb when Falcon Fanatic or BGFan are within shooting range.hammb wrote:Hockey will always be the boat anchor of the BG athletic department. It has some very die hard fans here though that will make it very tough for the university to ever think about dropping it.
I actually like hockey, obviously not nearly as much as Rick & Marta or many others, but I do like it.
I also think I used an incorrect article in my previous post. It's not "the" boat anchor, it's "A" boat anchor. Most of our sports probably fall into that category.
We've had this discussion before, and I know that my opinion is in the vast minority. I like hockey, and I love the fact that it's a sport we have such a great tradition in. I just don't think that our athletic department's revenues can sustain Division I hockey while at the same time competing in IA football. The result is that our hockey program has fallen far below it's historical roots, and has struggled to compete in the CCHA for a long time now. Looking at the CCHA we cannot commit the resources to the sport that most of our competitors can...whether they be huge athletic departments (UM, OSU, MSU, ND) or the only DI sport they play (AF, UNO, NMU, LSSU). The only teams in the CCHA that we can really hope to compete with are Miami & WMU...the rest of the schools just have resources that we cannot compete with.
Personally I'm the type that would much rather commit the maximum to less sports than do multiple sports half assed. My personal preference is football & basketball, as such I'd be inclined to drop hockey and put us more on par with most of our MAC brethren. What amazes me is when we see that our athletic budget is one of the smaller ones in the MAC and at the same time we're sustaining a DI hockey program...that makes it pretty tough to compete on the field/court/ice.
I suppose you could make just as good of a case to drop all DI sports except hockey, but my preference as a fan by far would be to go forward without a hockey program. I realize that it will likely never happen unless we have no other solutions, there's just too much history there. I don't want to get rid of hockey, but I do think that it would help us compete in the other major sports.
Now flame away hockey fans...sorry Falcon Fanatic & BGFan, I know how much you disagree...hope we can still be friends
Is it time for the annual "cutting hockey" argument ALREADY? I wasn't expecting this until after the holidays.
"I don't believe I can name a coach, anywhere, anytime, anyhow, who did it better than Doyt Perry."
-1955 BG Assistant Bo Schembechler
BGSUsports.com - Where ESPN.com goes for BG history.
-1955 BG Assistant Bo Schembechler
BGSUsports.com - Where ESPN.com goes for BG history.
- JohnnySwoop '85
- Peregrine

- Posts: 662
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:02 pm
- Bleeding Orange
- The Abominable Desert 'Cat

- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:06 pm
- Location: Searching for a home, via Chicago...
- Contact:
Ehh...didn't Kent drop hockey in the mid-1980's? Dr. Cartwright got to Kent around the same time that Dr. Ribeau started at BGSU.JohnnySwoop '85 wrote:It was during Cartwrights tenure at Kent that they dropped hockey.
From the halls of ivy...
It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan


It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan

Ehh...no. It was 93/94ish. And yeah, it was Cartwright, but seriously folks, as has been said time and time and time again, BG's hockey program and Kent's are apples and oranges.Bleeding Orange wrote:Ehh...didn't Kent drop hockey in the mid-1980's? Dr. Cartwright got to Kent around the same time that Dr. Ribeau started at BGSU.JohnnySwoop '85 wrote:It was during Cartwrights tenure at Kent that they dropped hockey.
"I don't believe I can name a coach, anywhere, anytime, anyhow, who did it better than Doyt Perry."
-1955 BG Assistant Bo Schembechler
BGSUsports.com - Where ESPN.com goes for BG history.
-1955 BG Assistant Bo Schembechler
BGSUsports.com - Where ESPN.com goes for BG history.
- Falcon Fanatic
- Peregrine

- Posts: 6798
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
- Location: BG
We love you hammb....yeah, really we do!!hammb wrote:I don't think she'd shoot me...I thought we were good friends1987alum wrote:Note to self: Don't stand near hammb when Falcon Fanatic or BGFan are within shooting range.hammb wrote:Hockey will always be the boat anchor of the BG athletic department. It has some very die hard fans here though that will make it very tough for the university to ever think about dropping it.
![]()
I actually like hockey, obviously not nearly as much as Rick & Marta or many others, but I do like it.
I also think I used an incorrect article in my previous post. It's not "the" boat anchor, it's "A" boat anchor. Most of our sports probably fall into that category.
We've had this discussion before, and I know that my opinion is in the vast minority. I like hockey, and I love the fact that it's a sport we have such a great tradition in. I just don't think that our athletic department's revenues can sustain Division I hockey while at the same time competing in IA football. The result is that our hockey program has fallen far below it's historical roots, and has struggled to compete in the CCHA for a long time now. Looking at the CCHA we cannot commit the resources to the sport that most of our competitors can...whether they be huge athletic departments (UM, OSU, MSU, ND) or the only DI sport they play (AF, UNO, NMU, LSSU). The only teams in the CCHA that we can really hope to compete with are Miami & WMU...the rest of the schools just have resources that we cannot compete with.
Personally I'm the type that would much rather commit the maximum to less sports than do multiple sports half assed. My personal preference is football & basketball, as such I'd be inclined to drop hockey and put us more on par with most of our MAC brethren. What amazes me is when we see that our athletic budget is one of the smaller ones in the MAC and at the same time we're sustaining a DI hockey program...that makes it pretty tough to compete on the field/court/ice.
I suppose you could make just as good of a case to drop all DI sports except hockey, but my preference as a fan by far would be to go forward without a hockey program. I realize that it will likely never happen unless we have no other solutions, there's just too much history there. I don't want to get rid of hockey, but I do think that it would help us compete in the other major sports.
Now flame away hockey fans...sorry Falcon Fanatic & BGFan, I know how much you disagree...hope we can still be friends
"Regarding BGSU, I would think their biggest strength is that they never give up, They never slow down and they battle hard even after the other team scores. We have to be on our game and never, ever take the foot off the gas for a second."
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
- Bleeding Orange
- The Abominable Desert 'Cat

- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:06 pm
- Location: Searching for a home, via Chicago...
- Contact:
Whoops. My bad.TG1996 wrote:Ehh...no. It was 93/94ish. And yeah, it was Cartwright, but seriously folks, as has been said time and time and time again, BG's hockey program and Kent's are apples and oranges.Bleeding Orange wrote:Ehh...didn't Kent drop hockey in the mid-1980's? Dr. Cartwright got to Kent around the same time that Dr. Ribeau started at BGSU.JohnnySwoop '85 wrote:It was during Cartwrights tenure at Kent that they dropped hockey.
Still, I don't think Cartwright has it out for hockey just because Kent got rid of their program. Based upon the stories I've heard about what happened with their team, I don't think ours is in any trouble at all.
From the halls of ivy...
It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan


It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan

-
professorjackson
- Fledgling

- Posts: 421
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 12:15 pm
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
- Contact:
The university is seeking great ideas to fix our problems.
http://bgsu.edu/offices/president/greatideas//
http://bgsu.edu/offices/president/greatideas//
Oh oh oh, I know I know I know!professorjackson wrote:The university is seeking great ideas to fix our problems.
http://bgsu.edu/offices/president/greatideas//

NWLB
*********************************
http://www.CruiseAficionados.com - A Community for Cruise Fans. (Try the mobile app "Cruise Aficionados)
*********************************
http://www.CruiseAficionados.com - A Community for Cruise Fans. (Try the mobile app "Cruise Aficionados)
