I think what's going on is that some people want to discredit us because of our weak overall strength of schedule, ranked 215th in the nation. But indeed, we have beaten 5 teams in the RPI top 100, one of whom is in the top 50. Where we're getting hurt is that the bad teams we've played are REALLY bad, like 300+ RPI bad. Winston-Salem, Lipscomb, and Gardner-Webb are examples of this.The Niz wrote:Never thought I would say this, but thank you espn. However, there seem to be some teams whose records and "quality" wins/losses are not nearly as impressive as ours. Life as one of the "little" guys (or girls) i guess.
However, you have to beat the teams on your schedule, and we've done that. At this point we're just going to continue to pick up votes so long as our ladies continue to play well and win.
GO BG!! BEAT DA BULLS!!!
