2/4 Western Mi at BG 7pm

[hammb]

Man I wish I could have been at that game last night. Can't believe I'm going to be missing at least 2 more home games this month I blame Obama for making me care about my job...yeah that's it.

Anywho...great performance from Nate, and OP. OP is really starting to step up his game in Marc's absence. If he stays out of foul trouble and can give us 25-30 minutes a night we will win games. Teams don't score inside when he's there. Throw in 7+ board from him and the recent scoring is gravy.

Nice to see Nate have a good game too. He hasn't been the player I've expected this year.

Hopefully this recent streak is a sign of things to come. This team has a frontcourt that can win a lot of games in the MAC. If the guards can do their parts we'll be a pretty tough out in the MAC tourney.

[Matty B]

Did anyone see that WMU player (I didn't see who it was) trip Otis Polk after he pulled down the board. That should have been a technical, but they didn't call anything. He hooked his foot around OP's leg and yanked it out from under him.

I thought he wen't down kinda funny... I was down at the other end of the court so I couldn't really see it well, though. I didn't think much of it at the time though because we've seen Otis (mainly in his younger days) go down clumsily on his own several times

[60yearsofsicsic]

I know this is the "easy" part of the schedule ... but i think that this team might have gotten better when Larson got hurt? nice kid just terrible DIV1 bball player

[BgWaRrIoR]

Did anyone else think that more people attended the women's game last night than the game tonight?? I really can't believe that 500+ more people were there tonight. It seemed so much more crowded last night. Oh well....athletic dept knows best

Great win regardless. We are finally growing some cahones and my man Nate, along with Otis, are really coming along. Really have nothing to complain about after tonight.....

So you say there is nothing to complain about after complaining that the men's attendence number was larger then the women's attendence number from last night, that makes sense. We just won our 4 straight game and the first thing you even mention is that the numbers say the men had more people then the women.

We care too much about attendence, who cares if the numbers say the men had more then the women as long as both get the W

Um geez would you like to point out where I was complaining??? I VERY happy we both won, I'm merely stating that the attendance numbers were curious. If I stopped worrying about attendance, I wouldn't go to the games. It is as much a part of the game as anything. Without people going to the games, we can't play. So why don't you stop jumping on everyone's back about every little thing you don't like

[BGFalconfromCincy]

Did anyone else think that more people attended the women's game last night than the game tonight?? I really can't believe that 500+ more people were there tonight. It seemed so much more crowded last night. Oh well....athletic dept knows best

Great win regardless. We are finally growing some cahones and my man Nate, along with Otis, are really coming along. Really have nothing to complain about after tonight.....

So you say there is nothing to complain about after complaining that the men's attendence number was larger then the women's attendence number from last night, that makes sense. We just won our 4 straight game and the first thing you even mention is that the numbers say the men had more people then the women.

We care too much about attendence, who cares if the numbers say the men had more then the women as long as both get the W

Um geez would you like to point out where I was complaining??? I VERY happy we both won, I'm merely stating that the attendance numbers were curious. If I stopped worrying about attendance, I wouldn't go to the games. It is as much a part of the game as anything. Without people going to the games, we can't play. So why don't you stop jumping on everyone's back about every little thing you don't like

Now if I did that then I wouldn't have any fun, and its not everyone only certain people (you, 24, xtreme)

My problem was bringing it up as the first thing in the game thread. I mean it was the first time we beat Western in 9 attempts and thats the first thing you say in the game thread. I mean if you put it in that attendence thread I probably wouldn't have said anything. That was my only problem, the place where you said it. I realize attendence is important and thats its going to be talked about after every game, I just think your point could have been better serviced in that crazy attendence thread.

[bgsufalcon24]

Did anyone else think that more people attended the women's game last night than the game tonight?? I really can't believe that 500+ more people were there tonight. It seemed so much more crowded last night. Oh well....athletic dept knows best

Great win regardless. We are finally growing some cahones and my man Nate, along with Otis, are really coming along. Really have nothing to complain about after tonight.....

So you say there is nothing to complain about after complaining that the men's attendence number was larger then the women's attendence number from last night, that makes sense. We just won our 4 straight game and the first thing you even mention is that the numbers say the men had more people then the women.

We care too much about attendence, who cares if the numbers say the men had more then the women as long as both get the W

Um geez would you like to point out where I was complaining??? I VERY happy we both won, I'm merely stating that the attendance numbers were curious. If I stopped worrying about attendance, I wouldn't go to the games. It is as much a part of the game as anything. Without people going to the games, we can't play. So why don't you stop jumping on everyone's back about every little thing you don't like

Cincy won't stop jumping because he doesn't realize how heavy he is.

[BGFalconfromCincy]

Did anyone else think that more people attended the women's game last night than the game tonight?? I really can't believe that 500+ more people were there tonight. It seemed so much more crowded last night. Oh well....athletic dept knows best

Great win regardless. We are finally growing some cahones and my man Nate, along with Otis, are really coming along. Really have nothing to complain about after tonight.....

So you say there is nothing to complain about after complaining that the men's attendence number was larger then the women's attendence number from last night, that makes sense. We just won our 4 straight game and the first thing you even mention is that the numbers say the men had more people then the women.

We care too much about attendence, who cares if the numbers say the men had more then the women as long as both get the W

Um geez would you like to point out where I was complaining??? I VERY happy we both won, I'm merely stating that the attendance numbers were curious. If I stopped worrying about attendance, I wouldn't go to the games. It is as much a part of the game as anything. Without people going to the games, we can't play. So why don't you stop jumping on everyone's back about every little thing you don't like

Cincy won't stop jumping because he doesn't realize how heavy he is.

Uh what, did you just call me fat, because I don't really need you doing that since I already know its the truth.

[bgsufalcon24]

Did anyone else think that more people attended the women's game last night than the game tonight?? I really can't believe that 500+ more people were there tonight. It seemed so much more crowded last night. Oh well....athletic dept knows best

Great win regardless. We are finally growing some cahones and my man Nate, along with Otis, are really coming along. Really have nothing to complain about after tonight.....

So you say there is nothing to complain about after complaining that the men's attendence number was larger then the women's attendence number from last night, that makes sense. We just won our 4 straight game and the first thing you even mention is that the numbers say the men had more people then the women.

We care too much about attendence, who cares if the numbers say the men had more then the women as long as both get the W

Um geez would you like to point out where I was complaining??? I VERY happy we both won, I'm merely stating that the attendance numbers were curious. If I stopped worrying about attendance, I wouldn't go to the games. It is as much a part of the game as anything. Without people going to the games, we can't play. So why don't you stop jumping on everyone's back about every little thing you don't like

Cincy won't stop jumping because he doesn't realize how heavy he is.

Uh what, did you just call me fat, because I don't really need you doing that since I already know its the truth.

Oh, dang I just KNEW I forgot something. The friggin smiley.



There. Now we've both had our "fun" for the day.

[BillyLP]

I know this is the "easy" part of the schedule ... but i think that this team might have gotten better when Larson got hurt? nice kid just terrible DIV1 bball player

The thing with Larson is that Marschall should have been playing the amount of minutes he was and Marc should have been in for like 8-10 minutes a game. He is a pretty good shot blocker and plays pretty good defense on occasion, but it was in no way beneficial to have him out there for 25 minutes when we have Marschall.

But i agree he is definitely a nice guy. He and Brian Moore are probably the two friendliest that I have met in my time here.

[BgWaRrIoR]

Did anyone else think that more people attended the women's game last night than the game tonight?? I really can't believe that 500+ more people were there tonight. It seemed so much more crowded last night. Oh well....athletic dept knows best

Great win regardless. We are finally growing some cahones and my man Nate, along with Otis, are really coming along. Really have nothing to complain about after tonight.....

So you say there is nothing to complain about after complaining that the men's attendence number was larger then the women's attendence number from last night, that makes sense. We just won our 4 straight game and the first thing you even mention is that the numbers say the men had more people then the women.

We care too much about attendence, who cares if the numbers say the men had more then the women as long as both get the W

Um geez would you like to point out where I was complaining??? I VERY happy we both won, I'm merely stating that the attendance numbers were curious. If I stopped worrying about attendance, I wouldn't go to the games. It is as much a part of the game as anything. Without people going to the games, we can't play. So why don't you stop jumping on everyone's back about every little thing you don't like

Now if I did that then I wouldn't have any fun, and its not everyone only certain people (you, 24, xtreme)

My problem was bringing it up as the first thing in the game thread. I mean it was the first time we beat Western in 9 attempts and thats the first thing you say in the game thread. I mean if you put it in that attendence thread I probably wouldn't have said anything. That was my only problem, the place where you said it. I realize attendence is important and thats its going to be talked about after every game, I just think your point could have been better serviced in that crazy attendence thread.

I really can't believe you could mention me with the likes of those two. I would like to think I actually contribute something worthwhile every now and then

And I guess after reading everyone else's comments, I had nothing else to say. No sense repeating myself. I would take s**t if I did that.

Finally, I am not putting anything of value in that attendance thread



All im saying is when you log on to AZZ, bring your happy face
People like happy faces............