Friday Night @ Northern Michigan

rood · Post by **rood** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:19 pm

Freddie wrote:UGG!

By my unofficial count, that's 6 empy net goals against us this year

I checked the stats page. It's official - six empty netters. Any idea how many goals we've scored with our goalie pulled?

Falcon Frenzy · Post by **Falcon Frenzy** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:34 pm

bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Falconfreak90 wrote:Damn...disappointing to say the least. When does the "Fire Paluch" thread start?
Check my updated sig.

Amen, brother! Love the new signature!

murphdogg · Post by **murphdogg** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:49 pm

Falconfreak90 wrote:Damn...disappointing to say the least. When does the "Fire Paluch" thread start?

I think there has been one. Its called "every single topic in this forum"

Bleeding Orange · Post by **Bleeding Orange** » Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:16 pm

murphdogg wrote:
Falconfreak90 wrote:Damn...disappointing to say the least. When does the "Fire Paluch" thread start?
I think there has been one. Its called "every single topic in this forum"

I read the first page and was about to ask when it ever stopped?

Ohhhh....

This sucks. The fundamentals are there, but this program needs a new leader. Period. If a coach were brought in that was competent not only on the ice, but who understood the history of the program and is willing to work actively with the alumni and the fan base, there is so much potential here, and I don't think it would be as hard as some of us think it might be. People are hungry for the return of Falcon hockey in Bowling Green, we have a great AD, and the right coach could make it happen. I have no doubt about that.

Freddie · Post by **Freddie** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:14 am

rood wrote:
Freddie wrote:UGG!

By my unofficial count, that's 6 empy net goals against us this year
I checked the stats page. It's official - six empty netters. Any idea how many goals we've scored with our goalie pulled?

TWO. Providence and Ohio State

rood · Post by **rood** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:55 am

Freddie wrote:
rood wrote:
Freddie wrote:UGG!

By my unofficial count, that's 6 empy net goals against us this year
I checked the stats page. It's official - six empty netters. Any idea how many goals we've scored with our goalie pulled?
TWO. Providence and Ohio State

Both of which we lost anyway.

Freddie · Post by **Freddie** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:07 pm

rood wrote:
Freddie wrote:
rood wrote:
Freddie wrote:UGG!

By my unofficial count, that's 6 empy net goals against us this year
I checked the stats page. It's official - six empty netters. Any idea how many goals we've scored with our goalie pulled?
TWO. Providence and Ohio State
Both of which we lost anyway.

You are correct. The ENG @ PC cut their lead from 4-2 to 4-3. The ENG against tOSU tied the score, but we lost in OT.

Before anyone starts to think that I'm opposed to the concept of pulling the goalie in favor of the extra attacker...I'm NOT. I'm just plain tired of always being behind, and thereby forced to pull him. I'm also frustrated by the fact that there doesn't seem to be any real plan for what we are going to do with that extra attacker once he gets on the ice.

Falcon Fanatic · Post by **Falcon Fanatic** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:32 pm

Tech83 wrote:Just love giving the boy a rough time.... Matt's alright.

No he not. I really don't think he's ever been quite right!

NWLB · Post by **NWLB** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:59 pm

Can we pull the coach in favor of the extra goalie?

Altoid_storm · Post by **Altoid_storm** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:41 pm

NWLB wrote:Can we pull the coach in favor of the extra goalie?

That's the best idea I've seen in a while.

Can someone call the team and suggest that for tonight?