hammb wrote:Thank you Transfer. People who think we need 8000+ seats are delusional. I'd much rather have a great 5000 seat arena than an empty 8000 seat one. For instance Oakland & EMU both have great newer facilities. Oakland's is much smaller (probably closer to 3000 seats), but it is a far better venue, IMO, because it's usually got a "fuller" feel and a much better atmosphere.transfer2BGSU wrote:The Athletic Department was thinking what was best for BGSU.HoopsFan wrote: I'm not (not) whining, but we went from 8K to 7K down to 5K in a hurry.
The "venerable" AA could have been added on to for less than $36M if the Student Services building property had not ben committed.
They looked at our attendance history over the 40 years AA was in use and decided to build a facility that was best for BGSU.
No need to build an 8,000 seat arena that is going to have 6,000 empty seats in it for 25 home basketball games each season and 12 or 13 home volleyball matches. This is not Eastern Michigan.
No need to build an 8,000 seat arena that is going to hold one or two concerts a year because the big boys won't tour in Bowling Green, Ohio since they are already touring in Cleveland, Detroit, Cincinnati, and Chicago in venues with 15,000+ seating capacities.
Build a 5,000 seat facility (and it may actually come in a little less than 5,000 when finally built) that eventually is going to sell out for all home basketball games (both men's and women's) and volleyball matches and everyone in Northwest Ohio is fighting for a THE HOT TICKET in collegiate sports.
BIGGER is not always better.
You would have been shocked to know how much it would have cost just to bring AA up to code without a practice court and additional locker rooms for OHSAA tourneys and coaches offices and meeting rooms and everything the Stroh Center is going to have.
ALRIGHT! The next chump who comes out here and tries to re-stoke this argument gets his ass kicked. Got that hammbonehead?






