Spring game thoughts

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
Post Reply
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:23 am
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Spring game thoughts

Post by MarkL »

As the spring game is still fresh in my head, a few thoughts

- Starting defense looked great. They shut out the first team until the last drive, which showed ...
- Lack of defensive depth. Second team defense wasn't so hot. When one of the defenses was out on the field, I think I counted less than twenty on the sideline.
- The wind did some damage to the passing offense. All quarterbacks had problems connecting, but they weren't helped by ...
- Wide receiver drops. Tons of them.
- Speaking of offense, you could see the transition. The offense was pretty similar to last year, just less short passes, more passing downfield (thank God), but in doing so, there were some bad reads. At points, I really wasn't sure who the ball was going to (wind, maybe?), and at others, it was going into multiple coverage.
- Speaking of offense again, of the QBs, I was most impressed by Beam. However, Beam only played against the second team defense, and see the defensive depth comments above.
- Steve Dunlap impressed me. Geter is obviously a speed back, Bullock is a power back, and Dunlap is really a hybrid of the two. As seen by his touchdown, he has great speed, but he is able to shake tackles that Geter couldn't shake.
- Ray Hutson. Wow! Two touchdowns, all kinds of grabs, and at this point is the receiver I like most.
- Pankratz had a great TD pass to Sheidt, but other than that, Pankratz had problems with the wind.
- First string defensive line looked good. Not much depth, but they played their hearts out all day long. Andrew Johnson had a great game at DL too.
- Jarret Sanderson had some monster hits, especially one on Geter. I was a little worried that Geter might have been hurt on that play - it took him a couple of seconds to get up.
- Our secondary is going to be scary good, I think. No Antonio Smith and Kenny Lewis hurts, but even without them, the starting secondary stuffed the passing offense. Lots of tips, great hits as soon as the ball arrived, and I am completely impressed by that pass D.

All around, I was impressed by the defense, but they need depth. I think a lot of the freshmen are going to play quickly. As for offense, I'm not sure yet. The defense is normally ahead of the offense at this point, so it should be no surprise that early on, when exhaustion wasn't a problem, the defense was much better. As soon as the lack of depth showed, though, the offense took off, starting with the second team and then late in the game, the first team offense shone. The new offensive scheme had its moments and it was difficult to tell how good they were because of the wind and the play of the starting defense. That being said, I'm optimistic. If the receivers don't drop so many passes, our passing offense has some serious potential this year.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
User avatar
freefalcon
Chick
Chick
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:06 am
Location: On the Edge

Post by freefalcon »

I had fun.

Great seeing everyone once again.
Shake for me, girl
I wanna be your backdoor man.
User avatar
Warthog
Freak Wanna-be!!
Freak Wanna-be!!
Posts: 7039
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bowling Green, OH

Post by Warthog »

I too think Beam looked much better than Sheehan. And Dunlap and Hutson were the most impressive RB and WR. But all three were going against the second team defense. So, did those guys play well or is it a lack of depth on the defensive side?

Along the same train of thought, Sheehan and Geter were thoroughly unimpressive. So, is the #1 defense that good???
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18498
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Post by Falconfreak90 »

Who really knows? BG trades spring game tape with Troy soon so they kept everything pretty simple. I saw a LOT of BG's offense from the last few years so I think it was more keep Troy guessing...and the rest of our opponents. All I know is I had a blast today with the AZZ.com crowd and am grilling brats now at home! It was FALCON FOOTBALL and sunshine. It was cool seeing Loren Hargrove, AT, Cory P, Dennis Wendle & Diyral Briggs back today. Got a chance to rap with Coach Orr...what a cool cat.

Best moment of the day was watching BGFan fall off Class of 61's cooler. Priceless. :lol: Hard to leave at the end of the day...:(

Just great time...kickoff is only 130 days off. BEAT TROY!!!!!!!!!!!

GO FALCONS!!!
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
murphdogg
Fledgling
Fledgling
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:56 am
Location: BGSU

Post by murphdogg »

Defensive depth should improve once the new freshmen enroll. Depth is usually pretty bad at most spring games, simply because the seniors are gone but the freshmen haven't arrived yet.
Guns don't kill people, Kai Kantola kills people

2008-2009 Men's and Women's Basketball MAC Champions
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Post by Flipper »

Freak is correct...teams trade spring game footage so you're no tlikely to see any new wrinkles. You need to see the last scrimmage before the spring game to get an idea of what the offense might look like down the road
factman
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Bowling Green
Contact:

Post by factman »

The "real" scrimmage/spring game was last Saturday and I thought that in that game the offense showed better than the defense!
Post Reply