Reading the original quote in it's original context, he had to have meant "shot in the arm."Ydfalcon wrote:Then again, maybe he really did mean "shot in the dark."Flipper wrote:Shot in the dark?..I think you meant to say "shot in the arm" Why should anyone take you seriously when you can't even use the correct cliche?
Rice?
- VDub26Falcon
- The Drunken Irish Falcon

- Posts: 4710
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 3:19 pm
- Location: Elyria, OH
- Contact:
Re: Rice?
Be Special, Be Different, BE Bowling Green - Dino Babers
Re: Rice?
I know. It was a poorly-executed attempt at some kind of humor. Not even really sure what I meant other than perhaps it was just a desperate attempt by a struggling coaching staff to try something, anything, different. The fact that it worked was pure luck, which was in short supply for that staff anyway.VDub26Falcon wrote:Reading the original quote in it's original context, he had to have meant "shot in the arm."Ydfalcon wrote:Then again, maybe he really did mean "shot in the dark."Flipper wrote:Shot in the dark?..I think you meant to say "shot in the arm" Why should anyone take you seriously when you can't even use the correct cliche?
- yd
Re: Rice?
Over 15 years as a season ticket holder in football and basketball, I want an answer to why Rice is not at running back. After what he did last year during the times he touched the ball, it's a valid question. I don't care if Brandon is coaching or Urban Meyer. Why isn't he back there running the ball?
Re: Rice?
The current coach thinks he would be a better service to the team on defense, and from the sounds of things, Rice is ok with that decision. That's why. That's the answer. Get over it.cowboyjoe wrote:Over 15 years as a season ticket holder in football and basketball, I want an answer to why Rice is not at running back. After what he did last year during the times he touched the ball, it's a valid question. I don't care if Brandon is coaching or Urban Meyer. Why isn't he back there running the ball?
- yd
Re: Rice?
Because the coach feels either A) Rice can better help the team as a LB, or B) He was so far down on the depth chart at RB he wouldn't contribute anyway, and he's better served at LB.cowboyjoe wrote:Over 15 years as a season ticket holder in football and basketball, I want an answer to why Rice is not at running back. After what he did last year during the times he touched the ball, it's a valid question. I don't care if Brandon is coaching or Urban Meyer. Why isn't he back there running the ball?
Either way it comes down to this simple answer: The Coach feels that the team is better with Rice at LB than he is at RB. It's not a conspiracy to prevent us from scoring points. It's not some deeply harbored hatred of sushi. The coach just feels that this is what's best for the team.
Personally, I don't see what you're so bent out of shape about. Rice had all of 16 carries last year. Did he look good in those carries? Sure, he did. But that isn't exactly a sample size large enough to act like they just benched the next Barry Sanders. He was a bottom of the depth chart RB (former WALK ON) who had one good game when he was needed as a fill-in last year.
I just don't see why you're so bent out of shape about this. He was likely going to be no better than 3rd on the depth chart at RB this year (again behind Geter & Bullock). Again, this is hardly worth harping on.
- Bleeding Orange
- The Abominable Desert 'Cat

- Posts: 7065
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 8:06 pm
- Location: Searching for a home, via Chicago...
- Contact:
Re: Rice?
Which, of course, begs the question: Why are you still trying to talk sense into this f**ktard?hammb wrote: Again, this is hardly worth harping on.
From the halls of ivy...
It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan


It is not my intention to do away with government. It is rather to make it work - work with us, not over us; stand by our side, not ride on our back. Government can and must provide opportunity, not smother it; foster productivity, not stifle it. ~Ronald Reagan

Re: Rice?
Wow, it's not often that I make a really concise post and then somebody else says almost the same thing in a much longer post. This feels backwards.
- yd
Re: Rice?
Just for fun mostlyBleeding Orange wrote:Which, of course, begs the question: Why are you still trying to talk sense into this f**ktard?hammb wrote: Again, this is hardly worth harping on.
-
transfer2BGSU
- Peregrine

- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: Jed's, Myle's Pizza, Corner Grill
Re: Rice?
Coaches feel he would be better used elsewherecowboyjoe wrote:Over 15 years as a season ticket holder in football and basketball, I want an answer to why Rice is not at running back.
Last year was last year and this year is a new yearcowboyjoe wrote:After what he did last year during the times he touched the ball, it's a valid question.
In case you haven't heard, there is a new sheriff in town. His name....Clawson. Dave Clawson.cowboyjoe wrote: I don't care if Brandon is coaching or Urban Meyer.
Coaches feel he would be better used elsewherecowboyjoe wrote:Why isn't he back there running the ball?
"The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back" -Herb Brooks
Re: Rice?
cowboyjoe wrote:Over 15 years as a season ticket holder in football and basketball, I want an answer to why Rice is not at running back. After what he did last year during the times he touched the ball, it's a valid question. I don't care if Brandon is coaching or Urban Meyer. Why isn't he back there running the ball?
The thing that perhaps most bothers me is that simply because you have paid money to guarantee yourself a seat at every home game, you somehow think you're entitled to some kind of special inside info. The only thing your money has bought you is those seats, sorry. Is it true that any university loves having that income from season ticket holders and would certainly hate to lose it? Of course. But at the same time, just because you bought season tickets doesn't really make you any more special or any more privy to information than the rest of the fans.
I don't mean to knock season ticket holders, in fact, if I find myself living within a reasonable driving distance someday when I have the disposable income to afford season tickets, I will definitely buy them. I think it's great to show that much support for the team to make what is essentially a big donation and to be in the stands for every game. I just fail to see how being a season ticket holder (regardless of how long you have been one) gives one the right to make demands of the team.
- yd
- always a falcon
- Peregrine

- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:04 pm
