11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
HoopsFan
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1131
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Quietly living in Central Ohio

11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by HoopsFan »

Yeah, somebody tell me what's different from last year.

HoopsFan
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18498
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by Falconfreak90 »

HoopsFan wrote:Yeah, somebody tell me what's different from last year.

HoopsFan
Gotta agree. We ran the ball pretty well at Missouri so I'm not sure why we didn't try rushing the ball more. 11 rushing attempts? Disappointing....
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
cowboyjoe
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:18 am

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by cowboyjoe »

Paging Mr. Bullock, Mr. Bullock, Mr. Bullock...where were you tonight? Geter was not able to move the pile and generate any yardage. We needed a change of pace.
h2oville rocket
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6691
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
Location: Waterville, ohio

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by h2oville rocket »

Serious question: How did BG throw for 385 yards with no INTs and only score 10 points? Seems like you'd get more by accident. Seems like we should have gotten SOME by accident against OSU. I really thought you guys would win by two or three scores.
User avatar
Warthog
Freak Wanna-be!!
Freak Wanna-be!!
Posts: 7039
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:57 am
Location: Bowling Green, OH

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by Warthog »

Two missed FGs and a turnover on downs late in the game.
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:23 am
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by MarkL »

Yeah, missed opportunities in both halves. We could have easily taken a 17-0 lead into halftime, or at least 10-0.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
User avatar
daspollak
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 816
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:40 pm
Location: Toledo, OH (No one is perfect)

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by daspollak »

We need to be able to run the ball to help our defense. Last night was a classic example of the D getting worn down late in the game.
Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach, teach PE.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8474
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by jpfalcon09 »

I thought the playcalling was pretty shaky during most of the game, and it set us up to fail. Whenever you're setting yourself up for field goals instead of getting 7 points, you're putting yourself behind the 8-ball. Marshall did a good job up front of clogging the line and getting pressure, and they covered well downfield. However, we came right out of the gate throwing the ball and never deviated away from it. I hope things change for Boise because we're going to be rather predictable against a pretty good defense.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
freefalcon
Chick
Chick
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:06 am
Location: On the Edge

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by freefalcon »

h2oville rocket wrote:Serious question: How did BG throw for 385 yards with no INTs and only score 10 points? ...
ANSWER = Shuttle pass
Shake for me, girl
I wanna be your backdoor man.
cowboyjoe
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 767
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:18 am

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by cowboyjoe »

h2oville rocket wrote:
Serious question: How did BG throw for 385 yards with no INTs and only score 10 points? ...


The quarterback does not run in this offense this year...except sideways while being chased.
User avatar
Redwingtom
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5251
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:16 pm

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by Redwingtom »

So who's to blame?

Coach or OC or both?
Redwingtom
michhiker28
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 703
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 3:18 pm
Location: Middle of the Mitten

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by michhiker28 »

Warthog wrote:Two missed FGs and a turnover on downs late in the game.
Once again, and I know I'm sounding like a broken record, we either need to recruit someone who can kick the damn ball, or we need to just give up kicking all together and treat anything inside the opponents 40 yard line as 4 down territory. We haven't had a reliable kicking game since Shaun.

--MH
Coming to you direct from flatland basecamp.
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14322
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by hammb »

I watched most of the first half, before I went out Saturday night, and I kept waiting for us to run the ball and we just never did. The gameplan was clearly that we felt we could move the ball against Marshall through the air, and obviously we really didn't have any problem doing just that. Yeah, I'd like to see a more balanced play selection as well, but it is VERY difficult to argue with the gameplan when you're able to move the ball at will most of the night. We threw 380+ yards and we really didn't have that great of success when we did try to run, and this with Marshall having to expect the pass most of the time. I mean if Geter was averaging 5 yards a pop I guess I'd have liked to see us run more, but he wasn't having much success when he did run, so I have no problem with throwing most of the time.

The problems were the same as they have been throughout most of the past few seasons. We don't have the type of playmakers that are necessary to put the ball in the endzone once we get close. Our QB isn't good enough to will us into the endzone like Harris or Omar were. Our OL isn't good enough to push forward into the endzone, and we don't have players at the WR or RB spots that are good enough to make plays on their own either.

As has been the case for too long now this team has not recruited the type of skill players that can make plays on their own, especially at the QB spot. When this team gets in the endzone it's truly a team effort. That's fine, but it's not how most great teams work. We don't have all MAC type skill players, and when our offense was great we were riddled with 'em. I'm hopeful that Clawson does a better job bringing in this type of talent than his predecessor.
User avatar
BGorDeath
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 2268
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 9:28 pm
Location: Living Hell

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by BGorDeath »

A sputtering offense? Sounds very similar to what happened at Tennessee last year. You get what you pay for. Somethings will never change.

Disclaimer: This is a sample of sarcasm found regularly on this site, but needs to have a disclaimer to avoid readers from throwing poison darts.
I like that steak comes from cows. That is why a cow will not think twice about eating you.
User avatar
MUTeke
Egg
Egg
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:52 am
Location: Whitesville, WV

Re: 11 runs 63 PASSES!!

Post by MUTeke »

h2oville rocket wrote:Serious question: How did BG throw for 385 yards with no INTs and only score 10 points? Seems like you'd get more by accident. Seems like we should have gotten SOME by accident against OSU. I really thought you guys would win by two or three scores.
BG wore us out with 7-10 yard curls, slants and out patterns. We allowed the completion but didn't give up much yardage after the catch. I think they had 2 receivers with double digit receptions and over 100 yards receiving. They also hit the middle in the short range as well. If I remember correctly the Falcons only went deep a couple of times and once was for a 50 yard TD. The dink and dunk game is a very effective strategy until the field is shortened inside the redzone. Those routes aren't as open when everyone is crowded in a 20 yard area. That's where the lack of a ground game hurt BG, IMO. They weren't able to punch it in when they got down there close.

I'm not sure the lack of a rushing attack was due to anything Marshall was doing up front. Regardless I just can't explain why they only rushed the ball 11 times against a defense that gave up 400 yards on the ground to Virginia Tech the week before. Fortunately for us they were one dimensional and allowed us to pin our ears back and bring pressure, especially in the 4th quarter.
Post Reply