BG down 32-13 at the half

Falconfreak90 · Post by **Falconfreak90** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 7:42 pm

Ouch...Temple living up to the billing so far.

GO FALCONS!

Rollo83 · Post by **Rollo83** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:23 pm

And we're a bad basketball team.

bgsufalcon24 · Post by **bgsufalcon24** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:39 pm

Rollo83 wrote:And we're a bad basketball team.

Well, at least against the good teams we are. At least we're beating our fair share of the bad teams. That in of itself is a welcome change from the Dakich era.

Rollo83 · Post by **Rollo83** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:59 pm

bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Rollo83 wrote:And we're a bad basketball team.
Well, at least against the good teams we are. At least we're beating our fair share of the bad teams. That in of itself is a welcome change from the Dakich era.

Yes, at least we're mediocre. That's why we haven't been to the NCAA Tournament since the 1960's.

BleedOrange · Post by **BleedOrange** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:13 pm

Rollo83 wrote:
bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Rollo83 wrote:And we're a bad basketball team.
Well, at least against the good teams we are. At least we're beating our fair share of the bad teams. That in of itself is a welcome change from the Dakich era.

Yes, at least we're mediocre. That's why we haven't been to the NCAA Tournament since the 1960's.

YAH-HOOOO! Can't wait to make the 4 hour round trip to see this team play on the 2nd!

BleedOrange · Post by **BleedOrange** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:17 pm

Hmmm. Austin Calhoun didn't get off the bench, again.

OSUFALCON · Post by **OSUFALCON** » Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:48 pm

bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Rollo83 wrote:And we're a bad basketball team.
Well, at least against the good teams we are. At least we're beating our fair share of the bad teams. That in of itself is a welcome change from the Dakich era.

Let's give Dakich a break he's been gone long enough. This team isn't very good right now.

BGFalconfromCincy · Post by **BGFalconfromCincy** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:27 am

OSUFALCON wrote:
bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Rollo83 wrote:And we're a bad basketball team.
Well, at least against the good teams we are. At least we're beating our fair share of the bad teams. That in of itself is a welcome change from the Dakich era.

Let's give Dakich a break he's been gone long enough.

Thank you, and its how amazing how some forget the early part of his tenture here when we were beating damn good teams and should have been an NCAA at-large team atleast twice.

Dakich had great teams, good teams, and bad teams. No need to bring him up his teams when he isnt here anymore. Right now we aren't a good team, doesn't matter who is coaching it.

Rollo83 · Post by **Rollo83** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:52 am

BGFalconfromCincy wrote:
OSUFALCON wrote:
bgsufalcon24 wrote:
Rollo83 wrote:And we're a bad basketball team.
Well, at least against the good teams we are. At least we're beating our fair share of the bad teams. That in of itself is a welcome change from the Dakich era.

Let's give Dakich a break he's been gone long enough.

Thank you, and its how amazing how some forget the early part of his tenture here when we were beating damn good teams and should have been an NCAA at-large team atleast twice.

Dakich had great teams, good teams, and bad teams. No need to bring him up his teams when he isnt here anymore. Right now we aren't a good team, doesn't matter who is coaching it.

Amen brother!

AyZiggy97 · Post by **AyZiggy97** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:41 am

Yikes. From AP: "The Falcons missed a whopping 20 of 24 shots in the first half and were doubled-up on the boards, 22-11. The Owls barely had to put a hand in their face as the Falcons rushed down and fired up errant shot after shot."

Temple's defense is historically outstanding, but that is depressing. Maybe the product of 9 days between games. Well, two potentially winnable games to go before the MAC.

JWEIII · Post by **JWEIII** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:28 am

I remember last year at this time we had some jumpers as well. "This team is horrible," and the like. Then they went out and won a MAC title. Let's try to stay calm. Breathe.

So Temple kicked our teeth in? Move on. Non-conference play in the MAC is like boobs on a mule - useless. Ain't gonna' be no at large bids, so conference play is all that really matters. So now is the time to gear up and be ready the second week in March. Like last year.

I'm still on the bandwagon and am looking forward some conference play.

BGSU33 · Post by **BGSU33** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:56 am

BleedOrange wrote:Hmmm. Austin Calhoun didn't get off the bench, again.

It really makes me wonder one, what in the world is it going to take for this kids to see the floor again, and two, what in the heck is really going on with him and /or Orr?

h2oville rocket · Post by **h2oville rocket** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:06 am

BGSU33 wrote:
BleedOrange wrote:Hmmm. Austin Calhoun didn't get off the bench, again.
It really makes me wonder one, what in the world is it going to take for this kids to see the floor again, and two, what in the heck is really going on with him and /or Orr?

See: Josh Freelove, University of Toledo, Gene Cross

Most athletic player, bigtime HS player, 26 per game in tough Florida league, gets three or four minutes per game.

Don't understand but I guess thats why I'm not a coach.

Redwingtom · Post by **Redwingtom** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:12 am

99.9% of the time, players like this don't see the court because of a poor work ethic in practice. The other 10.1% of the time they don't see the court because of an attitude problem.

Source: Fox News

OSUFALCON · Post by **OSUFALCON** » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:53 am

Redwingtom wrote:99.9% of the time, players like this don't see the court because of a poor work ethic in practice. The other 10.1% of the time they don't see the court because of an attitude problem.

Source: Fox News

Maybe it's a math problem Tom? 99.9% plus 10.1% = 110.0% Oh were they suppose to give 110%? I don't think Austin will be in BG for much longer. This late in the year to have only played 6 minutes.

BG down 32-13 at the half

BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half

Re: BG down 32-13 at the half