Beckman

Dayons_Den · Post by **Dayons_Den** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:54 pm

I actually like that Beckman was covering up the BG logo in the press room, I don't mind that at all. I think it adds to the rivalry. I'm glad our logo makes his blood boil, I'm the same way with Toledo crap. Other than the zoo, Tony Packo's, Mud Hens and museum of art the whole place can slide in to Lake Erie for all I care. Toledo is just lucky Akron beats it out as armpit of Ohio, but watch closely T-Towners, Akron is quickly turning itself around (talking municipalities here, not solely the schools).

I wasn't at the game so I can't speak to any postgame stuff on how it went down other than the still photos that have been posted. The lounging in the end zone and chewing on stuffed animals would seem to make more sense to me if the game was played as the final game as in years past- seniors on the field taking one last picture in pads etc. Seems odd to celebrate such a crowning moment relatively early in a season where undoubtedly your goal is larger than this one game. Now, don't get me wrong celebrate all you want and be excited but the amount of pictures, mean mugging, and posing seemed slightly excessive.

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:17 pm

I rooted for OSU to beat Toledo....I rooted for Syracuse and Bosie State as well. I had a good hearty laugh when the Rockettes went 0-3 and saw their ridiculous delusions of grandeur once again destroyed. I live by two rules...don't negotiate with terrorists and don't root for Toledo...

Time4Church8 · Post by **Time4Church8** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:47 pm

All year Beckman has been stressing to the team how important it is to beat Bowling Green. The team was trained to look at this like a huge game and they celebrated it like they won a huge game. And whats a rivalry without pissing the other team off?

Redwingtom · Post by **Redwingtom** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 pm

I don't think you pissed our team off at all. Our fans, maybe. Truthfully, all that was accomplished was cementing the fact that no one likes Toledo, by making childish asses of yourselves like you always do.

Doesn't matter if you win or lose, you do it every time.

FORT MEIGS ROCKET · Post by **FORT MEIGS ROCKET** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:10 pm

Flipper wrote:I rooted for OSU to beat Toledo....I rooted for Syracuse and Bosie State as well. I had a good hearty laugh when the Rockettes went 0-3 and saw their ridiculous delusions of grandeur once again destroyed. I live by two rules...don't negotiate with terrorists and don't root for Toledo...

Well I'm absolutely crushed you feel that way...
Excuse me while I wipe away the tears...

Redwingtom · Post by **Redwingtom** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:45 pm

And also as per usual. We saw ZERO of you zero's here before the game espousing your certitudes as you so eloquently have in victory. Typical.

Falcon Fanatic · Post by **Falcon Fanatic** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 7:26 pm

Isn't this the kind of PRE-GAME talk we should have been having?

It's 7:26 on Monday night...and TOLEDO STILLS SUCKS!!

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:35 pm

FORT MEIGS ROCKET wrote:
Flipper wrote:I rooted for OSU to beat Toledo....I rooted for Syracuse and Bosie State as well. I had a good hearty laugh when the Rockettes went 0-3 and saw their ridiculous delusions of grandeur once again destroyed. I live by two rules...don't negotiate with terrorists and don't root for Toledo...

Well I'm absolutely crushed you feel that way...
Excuse me while I wipe away the tears...

Yes...and the fact that you came over here and bothered to quote and respond to me is proof of your indifference? Do you understand how dumb this makes you look?

Flipper · Post by **Flipper** » Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:40 pm

Falcon Fanatic wrote:Isn't this the kind of PRE-GAME talk we should have been having?
It's 7:26 on Monday night...and TOLEDO STILLS SUCKS!!

well...RectalRanger decided he didn't want to leave well enough alone, so....

RangerRocket · Post by **RangerRocket** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 7:46 am

I am responsible for keeping the rivalry alive from the Rockets side of the house, especially with H2O out of pocket this year. Good luck the rest of the season and we'll see you in the Glass Bowl for the 2012 version of the Battle of I-75. Basketball is right around the corner...

vwfalcon · Post by **vwfalcon** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:11 am

Honestly... I would rather see you at Ford Field... which isn't completely out of the question... if we win out and take the East Division...

h2oville rocket · Post by **h2oville rocket** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:14 am

vwfalcon wrote:Honestly... I would rather see you at Ford Field... which isn't completely out of the question... if we win out and take the East Division...

Amazing and sad that that has never happened. In fact I don't think there has ever been a real rivalry game for the MACC. Most rivalries seem to be within the same division so that makes some sense and of course Toledo isn't REALLY Bg's rival, its uhhh, Miami, yeah Miami or OU maybe...

But how cool would it be for the two schools to play each other in Detroit for something meaningful? Let's hope it happens, vw!

factman · Post by **factman** » Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:43 pm

factman wrote:I will make anyone a bet right now that BGSU has more trees on their campus than scudville does on theirs! Any takers?

No takers......damn!

I just heard back for both UT and BGSU. Doug Collins, Director of Facilities and Construction at UT says there are 1618 shade and ornamental trees on the UT main campus and 556 evergreen trees for a total of 2,174 trees on the UT main campus. This does not include the natural growth along Swan Creek.

Dan Lemmerbrock, of the Data Hub and Resource Center, Office of Design and Construction at BGSU states that according to the Tree GIS data, there are a total of 3,168 trees on the BGSU main campus, NOT including the golf course, which is a part of main campus.

For those with a UT education, this means that BGSU has 994 MORE trees than the University of Turdledo on their main campus. They better call Johnny Appleseed!

RangerRocket · Post by **RangerRocket** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 8:57 am

factman wrote:
factman wrote:I will make anyone a bet right now that BGSU has more trees on their campus than scudville does on theirs! Any takers?

No takers......damn!

I just heard back for both UT and BGSU. Doug Collins, Director of Facilities and Construction at UT says there are 1618 shade and ornamental trees on the UT main campus and 556 evergreen trees for a total of 2,174 trees on the UT main campus. This does not include the natural growth along Swan Creek.

Dan Lemmerbrock, of the Data Hub and Resource Center, Office of Design and Construction at BGSU states that according to the Tree GIS data, there are a total of 3,168 trees on the BGSU main campus, NOT including the golf course, which is a part of main campus.

For those with a UT education, this means that BGSU has 994 MORE trees than the University of Turdledo on their main campus. They better call Johnny Appleseed!

Cornstalks do not count as trees...

h2oville rocket · Post by **h2oville rocket** » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:57 am

RangerRocket wrote:
factman wrote:
factman wrote:I will make anyone a bet right now that BGSU has more trees on their campus than scudville does on theirs! Any takers?

No takers......damn!

I just heard back for both UT and BGSU. Doug Collins, Director of Facilities and Construction at UT says there are 1618 shade and ornamental trees on the UT main campus and 556 evergreen trees for a total of 2,174 trees on the UT main campus. This does not include the natural growth along Swan Creek.

Dan Lemmerbrock, of the Data Hub and Resource Center, Office of Design and Construction at BGSU states that according to the Tree GIS data, there are a total of 3,168 trees on the BGSU main campus, NOT including the golf course, which is a part of main campus.

For those with a UT education, this means that BGSU has 994 MORE trees than the University of Turdledo on their main campus. They better call Johnny Appleseed!

Cornstalks do not count as trees...

Apparently the forested areas behind Parks and along the creek don't either, nor do trees on golf courses- this post should be required reading for "lying with statistics" courses.

Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman

Re: Beckman