Great music, though!Redwingtom wrote:You don't say?BGFan wrote:No familial brothers in the Doobie Brothers.Redwingtom wrote:What, no love for the Doobie Brothers?
Brother Bands
Forum rules
This forum is a "Free-for-all" type forum, but without all the freedom.
Religious or political discussions will not be tolerated, nor will personal attacks. The forum will be policed offending posts will be removed, and offending posters will be warned and/or disciplined.
This forum is a "Free-for-all" type forum, but without all the freedom.
Re: Brother Bands
-
transfer2BGSU
- Peregrine

- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: Jed's, Myle's Pizza, Corner Grill
Re: Brother Bands
The Statler Brothers
(wish they were coming to the Stroh Center)
(wish they were coming to the Stroh Center)
"The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back" -Herb Brooks
-
h2oville rocket
- Peregrine

- Posts: 6691
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
- Location: Waterville, ohio
Re: Brother Bands
BGFan wrote:Al Jardine was born in Lima.h2oville rocket wrote:No bites on Beach Boys NW Ohio connection?
Winner. He spent a lot of time as a youth at the beach along Hog Creek and got this great idea for a band....
-
RobbyFalcon
- Peregrine

- Posts: 523
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:24 pm
- Location: Hamilton, OH
- Contact:
Re: Brother Bands
Must have been hard to find a player for those 76's. That or suffer through the distortion of two revolutions per minute faster.h2oville rocket wrote:I actually considered them- they did some really cool and strange music before the Sat Night Fever stuff. Odessa is one of my favorite albums and not just because it was fuzzy. The Dorsey's...I cut my teeth on Jimmy and Tommy. Literally. Used to gum my dad's 76s.Lord_Byron wrote:No one on the BG board thought of these guys? (the '70s were scary)
- yd
-
h2oville rocket
- Peregrine

- Posts: 6691
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
- Location: Waterville, ohio
Re: Brother Bands
N
Put strips of lead tape around the turntable and it slows down two rpm. Yeah, 76s were kinda like Beta max, never really caught on. My dad is a purist though and felt the 78s didn't capture the room.Ydfalcon wrote:Must have been hard to find a player for those 76's. That or suffer through the distortion of two revolutions per minute faster.h2oville rocket wrote:I actually considered them- they did some really cool and strange music before the Sat Night Fever stuff. Odessa is one of my favorite albums and not just because it was fuzzy. The Dorsey's...I cut my teeth on Jimmy and Tommy. Literally. Used to gum my dad's 76s.Lord_Byron wrote:No one on the BG board thought of these guys? (the '70s were scary)
- Pete Segaard
- Peregrine

- Posts: 905
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 10:50 am
- Location: The banks of the mighty Portage River
Re: Brother Bands
Was it the wide strips or narrow strips of lead tape? I always thought that lead was too soft of a material and over dampened the turntable. Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.h2oville rocket wrote:NPut strips of lead tape around the turntable and it slows down two rpm. Yeah, 76s were kinda like Beta max, never really caught on. My dad is a purist though and felt the 78s didn't capture the room.Ydfalcon wrote:Must have been hard to find a player for those 76's. That or suffer through the distortion of two revolutions per minute faster.h2oville rocket wrote:I actually considered them- they did some really cool and strange music before the Sat Night Fever stuff. Odessa is one of my favorite albums and not just because it was fuzzy. The Dorsey's...I cut my teeth on Jimmy and Tommy. Literally. Used to gum my dad's 76s.Lord_Byron wrote:No one on the BG board thought of these guys? (the '70s were scary)
Team Falcon Around
The Falcon formerly known as oaklane2
The Falcon formerly known as oaklane2
- Lord_Byron
- Minister of Silly Walks

- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:04 am
- Location: Rochester NY
Re: Brother Bands
Pete Segaard wrote:. . . Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.
LOL. Remember how people used to argue about this one?
Direct Drive was truer speed because you could adjust the little strobe light to keep the turntable going at the right speed, but the belt-drive purists said that the direct-drive motor caused a background hum. . .
BG '79
Twitter: @Vapid_Inanities
Twitter: @Vapid_Inanities
Re: Brother Bands
Actually, the strobes were on both types. Belt drive purists felt that the belt helped in dampening the vibrations. Direct drive pundits claimed that there were fewer fluxuations in the speed. Neither one really had an advantage over the other. The only real difference was that the direct drive turntables cost more, thus they must be better...Lord_Byron wrote:Pete Segaard wrote:. . . Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.
LOL. Remember how people used to argue about this one?
Direct Drive was truer speed because you could adjust the little strobe light to keep the turntable going at the right speed, but the belt-drive purists said that the direct-drive motor caused a background hum. . .
- SW-MI Falcon
- Chick

- Posts: 187
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:45 pm
- Location: Mirror Lake in the Irish Hills near Brooklyn, MI
- Contact:
Re: Brother Bands
The Allman Brothers are my favorite bros with or without Duane. I've seen them 7 times.
Re: Brother Bands
What the hell are these old people talking about?BGFan wrote:Actually, the strobes were on both types. Belt drive purists felt that the belt helped in dampening the vibrations. Direct drive pundits claimed that there were fewer fluxuations in the speed. Neither one really had an advantage over the other. The only real difference was that the direct drive turntables cost more, thus they must be better...Lord_Byron wrote:Pete Segaard wrote:. . . Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.
LOL. Remember how people used to argue about this one?
Direct Drive was truer speed because you could adjust the little strobe light to keep the turntable going at the right speed, but the belt-drive purists said that the direct-drive motor caused a background hum. . .
"An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools."
- Ernest Hemingway
- Ernest Hemingway
Re: Brother Bands
Vinyl and turntables - the technology that our parents invented before we invented the compact disc and MP3 players for you.Warthog wrote:What the hell are these old people talking about?BGFan wrote:Actually, the strobes were on both types. Belt drive purists felt that the belt helped in dampening the vibrations. Direct drive pundits claimed that there were fewer fluxuations in the speed. Neither one really had an advantage over the other. The only real difference was that the direct drive turntables cost more, thus they must be better...Lord_Byron wrote:Pete Segaard wrote:. . . Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.
LOL. Remember how people used to argue about this one?
Direct Drive was truer speed because you could adjust the little strobe light to keep the turntable going at the right speed, but the belt-drive purists said that the direct-drive motor caused a background hum. . .
- Pete Segaard
- Peregrine

- Posts: 905
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 10:50 am
- Location: The banks of the mighty Portage River
Re: Brother Bands
Speak up, us old people can't hear you after all these years of cranking up our stereos until the turntables would start to shake and skipping the tonearm across the long playing vinyl albums.Warthog wrote:What the hell are these old people talking about?BGFan wrote:Actually, the strobes were on both types. Belt drive purists felt that the belt helped in dampening the vibrations. Direct drive pundits claimed that there were fewer fluxuations in the speed. Neither one really had an advantage over the other. The only real difference was that the direct drive turntables cost more, thus they must be better...Lord_Byron wrote:Pete Segaard wrote:. . . Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.
LOL. Remember how people used to argue about this one?
Direct Drive was truer speed because you could adjust the little strobe light to keep the turntable going at the right speed, but the belt-drive purists said that the direct-drive motor caused a background hum. . .
Team Falcon Around
The Falcon formerly known as oaklane2
The Falcon formerly known as oaklane2
-
transfer2BGSU
- Peregrine

- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: Jed's, Myle's Pizza, Corner Grill
Re: Brother Bands
Warthog wrote:What the hell are these old people talking about?BGFan wrote:Actually, the strobes were on both types. Belt drive purists felt that the belt helped in dampening the vibrations. Direct drive pundits claimed that there were fewer fluxuations in the speed. Neither one really had an advantage over the other. The only real difference was that the direct drive turntables cost more, thus they must be better...Lord_Byron wrote:Pete Segaard wrote:. . . Was your turntable direct drive or belt drive, that would make a difference.
LOL. Remember how people used to argue about this one?
Direct Drive was truer speed because you could adjust the little strobe light to keep the turntable going at the right speed, but the belt-drive purists said that the direct-drive motor caused a background hum. . .
Just wait for them to change the conversation to talking about which album cover was best to separate their marijuana seeds.
No wonder SW-MI Falcon likes the Allman Brothers so much
OH - those big black vinyl round things they were talking about earlier were called "albums" and they used to come with a protective sleeve and a cardboard cover. I've heard stories about some people using those album covers for uses other than the intended protection of the big round black vinyl thing.
"The name on the front of the jersey is more important than the name on the back" -Herb Brooks



