h2oville rocket wrote:Ozcat wrote:Flipper wrote:Any way...that 13,000 seat arena had 8400 in it for a game against a huge rival. OU...coming off a historic NCAA run and playing against a traditional rival on a Saturday afternoon plays to a roughly 65% capacity crowd.
1) Kent is not a "huge" rival. Miami is our rival, and our disdain for Akron is up there. Kent is a distant 3rd.
2) Tip was at 11AM. It was originally scheduled for 7PM. The change in time for tv likely cost us 1,500 fans.
3) That 65% capacity crowd is 3x the size of the MAC average. Pretty impressive.
His point wasn't to denigrate the size of OU's fanbase but to say even at OU, with all those things going for it, they can't fill their fieldhouse. The concern in the thread was overbuilding-no MAC school needs a 13,000 seat arena. Few need even a 6,000 seat arena.
Flipper, the comment about OU's 8400 turnout diminishes your point, not support it. At 11am on Saturday morning, OU drew more than BG ever has in it's history. 8400 freaking people - 7-8 times the typical BG attendance during at times. If the game was played at a normal time, how many more would have attended?
I agree that 13,000 is an enormous capacity for a mid-major basketball facility and have never said that capacity made any sense for BG. However, let's look at the specific numbers. We could have built a facility to hold 7K or 8K, both of which would have been very reasonable sizes, and IMO preferable.
Admittedly, BG's situation is much better than that of NIU or EMU, which draw 100-200 per game. To my knowledge, that type of turnout is recent in the MAC and isn't historically normal for those schools. And I'll agree with Hammbone that when we start winning, I expect 3-4K per game quickly. At 4K, I will always say that the ceiling is too low.
(Please understand that I have been purposely rhetorical in this thread to emphasize my point.)