factman wrote:The same could be said about the course(s) you teach. Most students don't care about them, but they do care about the courses they are currently taking and many also care about the athletic programs!
Exactly. The professor talks about the central misson of the university and then turns it into a popularity contest about what students "like" more as a determinator of worth. Most would choose the option of attending a football or basketball game over 85% of the courses any day of the week. How many students of the professor take his class to fulfill a major requirment or for a reason other than pure intellectual curiosity?
Even better, how about polling the students about whether they'd prefer a tuition reduction instead of 15% raises for their professors?
Both academics and athletics play roles in enriching the university, but when money gets tight there's the instinct to start looking out for individual interests and criticizing perceived enemies. Dave Clawson, Louis Orr, Jen Roos and Danny Schmitz are not threats to the academic integrity of the university. They are assets.



