MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10208
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by BGSU33 »

GO BG!!!
San Diego Falcon
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1369
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:26 pm

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by San Diego Falcon »

The MAC just loves them empty stadiums on Tuesdays and Wednesdays in November.
"but when you look at ths team beyond the suck , you see a glorious future again" - MACMAN
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8697
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by jpfalcon09 »

ESPN needs inventory and things to grow ESPN3 with. I wouldn't be shocked if ESPN3 ends up being a cable and satellite channel in the near future with these contracts. They now have the MAC and AAC signed long-term. If anything this might be the saving grace for FBS football since ESPN needs the G5 around to fill mid-week content. I would say if anything this deal gives the MAC some much needed stability.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
BGSU33
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 10208
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Boulder, CO

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by BGSU33 »

Saw a tweet that said the new deal is worth over $100M over 13 years and that each MAC school goes from getting $90K per year in the old deal to $650K in the new one!!! Great news!
GO BG!!!
User avatar
thewebboy
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 588
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:16 am

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by thewebboy »

BGSU33 wrote:Saw a tweet that said the new deal is worth over $100M over 13 years and that each MAC school goes from getting $90K per year in the old deal to $650K in the new one!!! Great news!
That may soften the blow to our athletic budget if the P5 stop scheduling MAC schools.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by Schadenfreude »

BGSU33 wrote:Saw a tweet that said the new deal is worth over $100M over 13 years and that each MAC school goes from getting $90K per year in the old deal to $650K in the new one!!! Great news!
Per year? If true: Wow!
User avatar
thewebboy
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 588
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:16 am

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by thewebboy »

I don't mind the weeknight games, but I think it should be limited to 2 per team (1 home, 1 away)

Also, every team should play on the same day (Fri or Sat) the last game of the season. This way everyone would have equal prep time for the championship game.

Even though we took care of NIU last year, I remember thinking it wasn't right they had 3 extra days to prep and get healthy.
User avatar
Falcon Fanatic
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 6798
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:23 pm
Location: BG

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by Falcon Fanatic »

"Regarding BGSU, I would think their biggest strength is that they never give up, They never slow down and they battle hard even after the other team scores. We have to be on our game and never, ever take the foot off the gas for a second."
~~USCHO Poster
"BG was relentless. It's like they know that a good first pass on the breakout from a defenseman will almost always result in an odd-man rush against them - but they go in anyway and dare you to make that pass. All three of their goals were just grit and effort. That's a team any fan can be proud to support...they give all they've got."
~~USCHO Poster, AFTER Tech beat us
#NeverGiveUp
#NeverSurrender
#Relentless
#Resiliant
mscarn
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1411
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:17 pm

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by mscarn »

Fantastic article.

The mid-week games ruin home attendance and the confinement of the rest (aka 80% of the season) to obscure internet feeds instead of other cable channels limits the number of people that can see the games on TV. Lose/Lose for 650K a year.
User avatar
Beaker
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:53 am
Location: Thornville, Ohio

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by Beaker »

Jiminez makes a lot of good points in this article. When you look at little deeper, past the initial figures, this deal has some troubling aspects to it.

Being someone that lives 3 hours away from BG, I hate the midweek games because it keeps me from attending games that I would be there for if they were played on Saturdays. I understand the flip side arguments about the tv exposure it gets us and I know you can never please everyone, but putting all of our eggs in the ESPN basket at the expense of cutting off other opportunites makes me uneasy. I've never been a fan of putting too much power in the hands of one entity, whether it be football, political power or anything else.
User avatar
hammb
The Stabber of Cherries
The Stabber of Cherries
Posts: 14434
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:21 am
Location: Bowling Green

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by hammb »

So let me get this straight. We continue to make peanuts from ESPN on the new deal. We continue to schedule and play games on weekdays, alienating the fanbase that wants to attend them, so that they can put the games on television (and by that I mean 90% of the games end up on ESPN3).

In doing so we also gave up ALL TV rights to basketball and several olympic sports? Meaning that local & Fox Sports broadcasted hoops games are a thing of the past? Meaning that the games will only hit an internet stream if it is ESPN3...no more free streams on bgsufalcons.com?

WOw...this deal really blows if that's all the case. I'm sure that ESPN is mandated by the terms of the deal to air a certain number of hoops games, but I bet very few of those will hit actual TV channels rather than ESPN3. If that's the case we actually LOST exposure on this deal. The MAC TV basketball games and the internet streams were things I watched all the time to catch road games...now I'll have no access to any of it because I'm one of the millions and millions of Americans who DO NOT have access to ESPN3. Like it or not people in charge, that is NOT a real TV station...it's a tightly controlled largely inaccessible internet stream. Taking the games there doesn't increase exposure it decreases it drastically.

The people who were willing to log into an internet stream and watch a hoops game were already able to do that...now a large number of them (myself included) will not be able to.

Thanks MAC...enjoy your pennies on the dollar while you continue to rape your fanbase...my god I hate this conference sometimes...
gmartin
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:20 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by gmartin »

Directv should try and work out a deal to add all ESPN3 broadcasts somehow. As a Directv customer it sucks I can't access ESPN3. I buy the extra football and basketball packages but there are still hundreds of games I can't access.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by Schadenfreude »

This is a good deal. It keeps #MACtion on ESPN in November. It almost quintuples TV revenue. I remember when the only MAC football game we could get on national television was the California Bowl. If we want to maintain our exposure, we need to play some games on cold November Tuesday and Wednesday nights. I don't love those games, either, but that's the reality. I think the conference did well here.
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7174
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by kdog27 »

Schadenfreude wrote:This is a good deal. It keeps #MACtion on ESPN in November. It almost quintuples TV revenue. I remember when the only MAC football game we could get on national television was the California Bowl. If we want to maintain our exposure, we need to play some games on cold November Tuesday and Wednesday nights. I don't love those games, either, but that's the reality. I think the conference did well here.
+1
AyZiggy97
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:47 am
Location: Detroit

Re: MAC & ESPN agree to new 13-year deal

Post by AyZiggy97 »

The number of people on this board who decry streaming in favor of traditional television is amazing. I've thought I was in prehistoric times by the number of people who have dropped their form of cable altogether. ESPN3 and streaming is where the growth is, not traditional teevee.

All things being equal, I'd rather be with ESPN. It's a love-hate relationship, but people look at you differently if you're not with them. The Big East has every men's basketball home game on Fox Sports 1 and a lot of people last year viewed them as some kind of mid major. It was being compared to the A10. Yes the football teams left, but of equal consideration was bolting ESPN for more money with FS1.
Post Reply