I didn't say there wasn't some kind of altercation...I said there wasn't an assault...in the sense that there was a criminal charge AND a conviction. The fact that they "stood before a judge" is meaningless...innocent people stand in front of judges every day...they plead not guilty and they system does it's thing...as it did in this case.2006Grad wrote:I would say the bouncer with the broken nose would beg to differ!They didn't assault anyone
The fact is one person was fired for an offense that didn't involve the police at all and the others were able to keep their job even after having stood in front of a judge. If Jans was warned previously and still choose to act that when, then cool fire him. But all the AD had to say was "we talked with him previous and gave him a zero tolerance policy, he broke it" . When this becomes cloak and dagger affairs it gives ammo for us message board people to speculate.
So far as the stuff with Jans goes...how much information do you need? They canned him..he didn't contest anything after getting fired...made no attempt to win any PR wars in the media or anything. He just took it and went home to Kansas. I think that says somehting...



