Georgia Tech

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
hiway44
Egg
Egg
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:46 pm

Georgia Tech

Post by hiway44 »

This may be a game that BGSU could win. It's hard to believe I'm saying this but I still have confidence in our student athletes for this game.
1. They may be looking past us and we could steal this game.
2. The percentages are in our favor for a win. Just like the Browns!
3. Take advantage of the turnovers.
4. Slow the game down use all the clock. If they don't have the ball , they can't score!!!!!!
5. Weather may be in our favor.

6. Any coaching will be a plus for our team. That's if they listen to Jink or his staff anymore!

Final score:
BGSU:30
GT: 28.
gmartin
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:20 am
Location: Indianapolis

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by gmartin »

GA Tech 48
BG 17

GA Tech may score more if BG turns the ball over or has several 3 and outs.

BG Defense now last in YPG. Last in TD allowed. 128 out of 130 in Defense efficiency.

GA Tech #3 rush offense at 335 YPG.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18315
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Flipper »

In the context of the Burt Reynolds classic "Deliverance"...Tech is going to be the redneck, we're going to be Ned Beatty.

GT 63

BG 20

Squeal like a pig
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8473
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by jpfalcon09 »

BG can't stop simple zone reads and straight dive plays, so one can only imagine the amount of pain the option is going to inflict on this defense. Couple that with a team that looks to be mentally checked out and you're going to have a recipe for disaster.

GA Tech 70 (yep)
BG 14

Counting down the days to hockey season.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Schadenfreude »

hiway44 wrote:This may be a game that BGSU could win.
No.

The Ramblin' Wreck is going to run us over.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Schadenfreude »

It won't be Cumberland bad. But it's going to be bad.
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8371
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by mbenecke »

I feel like the reason this could be closer than we think is because of the offense they run. The triple option bleeds the clock, allowing only 10ish possessions per team. They'll run all over us, but they may not have the time it takes to score 70ish.

I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
BGSU '20
User avatar
Lord_Byron
Minister of Silly Walks
Minister of Silly Walks
Posts: 2158
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:04 am
Location: Rochester NY

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Lord_Byron »

Schadenfreude wrote:It won't be Cumberland bad. But it's going to be bad.
Nice esoteric John Heisman reference.
BG '79

Twitter: @Vapid_Inanities
Siborg
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:51 pm

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Siborg »

mbenecke wrote:I feel like the reason this could be closer than we think is because of the offense they run. The triple option bleeds the clock, allowing only 10ish possessions per team. They'll run all over us, but they may not have the time it takes to score 70ish.

I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
I see what you are saying but it implies BG can effectively move the football and eat clock thus keeping our D somewhat fresh. If BG can do that then I see it as a 45-13 score but if not, Ga Tech might have to figure out how not to score a hundy. Triple option can roll up the score really fast on a tired D.
User avatar
footballguy51
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3025
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 5:19 pm

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by footballguy51 »

My guess: GT 66, BG 9.
ROLL ALONG!!!
User avatar
kdog27
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 7154
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by kdog27 »

mbenecke wrote:I feel like the reason this could be closer than we think is because of the offense they run. The triple option bleeds the clock, allowing only 10ish possessions per team. They'll run all over us, but they may not have the time it takes to score 70ish.

I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
Watch the second half of the Maryland game. They did not have much problem running the ball exclusively and scoring a bunch.
User avatar
Falconfreak90
Rubber City Falcon
Rubber City Falcon
Posts: 18495
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Green, OH
Contact:

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Falconfreak90 »

Tech in a laugher...until I see something otherwise. 58-14.
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8473
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by jpfalcon09 »

BG has opened a 27.5-pt dog.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by Schadenfreude »

jpfalcon09 wrote:BG has opened a 27.5-pt dog.
Take the Jackets.
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:23 am
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: Georgia Tech

Post by MarkL »

So here's a stat I need to do. Take all our opponent's rushing average in games other than BG. Calculate average differential between average and against BG. This stat would show how much more successful our opponents are against us than anyone else on the ground. Apply that to GT's average rushing yards to predict the number of rushing yards this Saturday. Set that as over / under.

Update, the number is 708 yards. If GT rushes their average (331 ypg) x opponent percentage average against BG (214%). 708 yards.

There's another way to calculate it where you take all opponent rushing yards as one stat (as opposed to averaging opponent averages if that makes sense). In that case the number is 595 yards.

Either way I'll take under. I don't think a team can possibly run 708 or 595 yards in 60 minutes. Especially Georgia Tech's slow-paced offense.

(Please don't take that as a challenge.)
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
Post Reply