Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech
This may be a game that BGSU could win. It's hard to believe I'm saying this but I still have confidence in our student athletes for this game.
1. They may be looking past us and we could steal this game.
2. The percentages are in our favor for a win. Just like the Browns!
3. Take advantage of the turnovers.
4. Slow the game down use all the clock. If they don't have the ball , they can't score!!!!!!
5. Weather may be in our favor.
6. Any coaching will be a plus for our team. That's if they listen to Jink or his staff anymore!
Final score:
BGSU:30
GT: 28.
1. They may be looking past us and we could steal this game.
2. The percentages are in our favor for a win. Just like the Browns!
3. Take advantage of the turnovers.
4. Slow the game down use all the clock. If they don't have the ball , they can't score!!!!!!
5. Weather may be in our favor.
6. Any coaching will be a plus for our team. That's if they listen to Jink or his staff anymore!
Final score:
BGSU:30
GT: 28.
Re: Georgia Tech
GA Tech 48
BG 17
GA Tech may score more if BG turns the ball over or has several 3 and outs.
BG Defense now last in YPG. Last in TD allowed. 128 out of 130 in Defense efficiency.
GA Tech #3 rush offense at 335 YPG.
BG 17
GA Tech may score more if BG turns the ball over or has several 3 and outs.
BG Defense now last in YPG. Last in TD allowed. 128 out of 130 in Defense efficiency.
GA Tech #3 rush offense at 335 YPG.
- Flipper
- The Global Village Idiot

- Posts: 18315
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 1:01 am
- Location: Ida Twp, MI
Re: Georgia Tech
In the context of the Burt Reynolds classic "Deliverance"...Tech is going to be the redneck, we're going to be Ned Beatty.
GT 63
BG 20
Squeal like a pig
GT 63
BG 20
Squeal like a pig
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
- jpfalcon09
- Peregrine

- Posts: 8473
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
- Location: Detroit Beach, MI
Re: Georgia Tech
BG can't stop simple zone reads and straight dive plays, so one can only imagine the amount of pain the option is going to inflict on this defense. Couple that with a team that looks to be mentally checked out and you're going to have a recipe for disaster.
GA Tech 70 (yep)
BG 14
Counting down the days to hockey season.
GA Tech 70 (yep)
BG 14
Counting down the days to hockey season.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: Georgia Tech
No.hiway44 wrote:This may be a game that BGSU could win.
The Ramblin' Wreck is going to run us over.
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: Georgia Tech
It won't be Cumberland bad. But it's going to be bad.
Re: Georgia Tech
I feel like the reason this could be closer than we think is because of the offense they run. The triple option bleeds the clock, allowing only 10ish possessions per team. They'll run all over us, but they may not have the time it takes to score 70ish.
I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
BGSU '20
- Lord_Byron
- Minister of Silly Walks

- Posts: 2158
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:04 am
- Location: Rochester NY
Re: Georgia Tech
Nice esoteric John Heisman reference.Schadenfreude wrote:It won't be Cumberland bad. But it's going to be bad.
BG '79
Twitter: @Vapid_Inanities
Twitter: @Vapid_Inanities
Re: Georgia Tech
I see what you are saying but it implies BG can effectively move the football and eat clock thus keeping our D somewhat fresh. If BG can do that then I see it as a 45-13 score but if not, Ga Tech might have to figure out how not to score a hundy. Triple option can roll up the score really fast on a tired D.mbenecke wrote:I feel like the reason this could be closer than we think is because of the offense they run. The triple option bleeds the clock, allowing only 10ish possessions per team. They'll run all over us, but they may not have the time it takes to score 70ish.
I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
- footballguy51
- Peregrine

- Posts: 3025
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 5:19 pm
Re: Georgia Tech
Watch the second half of the Maryland game. They did not have much problem running the ball exclusively and scoring a bunch.mbenecke wrote:I feel like the reason this could be closer than we think is because of the offense they run. The triple option bleeds the clock, allowing only 10ish possessions per team. They'll run all over us, but they may not have the time it takes to score 70ish.
I see this being along the lines of a 38-24 game that isn't as close as the score indicates.
- Falconfreak90
- Rubber City Falcon

- Posts: 18498
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
- Location: Green, OH
- Contact:
Re: Georgia Tech
Tech in a laugher...until I see something otherwise. 58-14.
Michael W.
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
BGSU-12 TIME MAC CHAMPION
FALCON FOOTBALL ROCKS!
- jpfalcon09
- Peregrine

- Posts: 8473
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
- Location: Detroit Beach, MI
- Schadenfreude
- Professional tractor puller

- Posts: 6983
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 7:39 am
- Location: Colorado
Re: Georgia Tech
Take the Jackets.jpfalcon09 wrote:BG has opened a 27.5-pt dog.
Re: Georgia Tech
So here's a stat I need to do. Take all our opponent's rushing average in games other than BG. Calculate average differential between average and against BG. This stat would show how much more successful our opponents are against us than anyone else on the ground. Apply that to GT's average rushing yards to predict the number of rushing yards this Saturday. Set that as over / under.
Update, the number is 708 yards. If GT rushes their average (331 ypg) x opponent percentage average against BG (214%). 708 yards.
There's another way to calculate it where you take all opponent rushing yards as one stat (as opposed to averaging opponent averages if that makes sense). In that case the number is 595 yards.
Either way I'll take under. I don't think a team can possibly run 708 or 595 yards in 60 minutes. Especially Georgia Tech's slow-paced offense.
(Please don't take that as a challenge.)
Update, the number is 708 yards. If GT rushes their average (331 ypg) x opponent percentage average against BG (214%). 708 yards.
There's another way to calculate it where you take all opponent rushing yards as one stat (as opposed to averaging opponent averages if that makes sense). In that case the number is 595 yards.
Either way I'll take under. I don't think a team can possibly run 708 or 595 yards in 60 minutes. Especially Georgia Tech's slow-paced offense.
(Please don't take that as a challenge.)
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
You may all now return to your daily lives.

