footballguy51 wrote:Actually, he has a point. This team has backed their way into the tournament. They lost to teams they should not have and got lucky in the end. HOWEVER, they have shown they can step up to tough competition, so perhaps they will do well.TalonsUpPuckDown wrote:The only point you have is on top of your head.TommyG wrote:Troll? I actually have a point to my posts. I don’t think the WCHA deserves two bids...ever. Despite my thoughts, the team got lucky and looks to be in. I think we’ll get exposed quickly in game 1 depending on the matchup.TalonsUpPuckDown wrote:It's pretty clear you don't follow any sort of hockey whatsoever. And here I go breaking my "don't feed the troll" rule.TommyG wrote:I follow lots of college hockey teams. Being an alum I follow BG too. Hope that’s ok with you! Maybe you should go follow someone else.Hockey John wrote:We will receive an at large bid because we met the qualifications and made the top 15 of the Pairwise. Why is that so hard for you to understand? Under the system set up, we earned a bid. If you don't like our program, go follow someone else. I guarantee the you will not be missed around here.TommyG wrote:It’s pretty embarrassing actually. Really should have lost in regulation the way we played the 3rd period.
Still don’t know how the math worked out in our favor. This team shouldn’t get an at large with an SOS in the mid 40s.
Interesting to see what they do with the opportunity.
Providence and Quinnipiac lost in the quarterfinals of their league tournaments to unranked teams yet they made the tournament due to their whole season not just their league tournament. We made the NCAA tournament this year because we earned one of the top 15 spots in the pairwise. It is as simple as that.
Am I disappointed about the outcome of the WCHA final game? Of course I am, but we still deserve the bid.
Tommy G, Apollo or whoever you are, why should I follow a different team? I am an alum and supporter of BGSU Falcon Hockey. You ought to try the same if you are an alum.



