NCAA Tournament Watch

The history is there...follow as the tradition returns!
TommyG
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 858
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:32 am

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by TommyG »

There is a good chance the committee just takes teams that seem to have a decent record and not focus much on resumes. You put Denver in WCHA they maybe lose 4-5 games. It’s a really bad conference.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by jpfalcon09 »

TommyG wrote: Sun Mar 14, 2021 3:22 pm There is a good chance the committee just takes teams that seem to have a decent record and not focus much on resumes. You put Denver in WCHA they maybe lose 4-5 games. It’s a really bad conference.
Possible. I still believe they're going to take schools where travel is going to be minimal for the regional sites which will favor the big conferences. NCHC stands to gain the most IMO.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
unfalconbelievable
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 1164
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:31 pm

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by unfalconbelievable »

BG doesn't take of business today, it justifies the sub 500 NCHC and east coast hockey biases teams to get in. 20 wins means little if you can't get past the opening round of your league tournament. Ask the women's basketball team, they just won the league and 75 percent of their games. NIT or sitting at home because they lost the final.
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8380
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by mbenecke »

unfalconbelievable wrote: Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:04 pm BG doesn't take of business today, it justifies the sub 500 NCHC and east coast hockey biases teams to get in. 20 wins means little if you can't get past the opening round of your league tournament. Ask the women's basketball team, they just won the league and 75 percent of their games. NIT or sitting at home because they lost the final.
I mostly agree with this. I still don't think it justifies putting in sub .500 teams, but BG needs to take matters into their own hands here.
BGSU '20
Critical Thinker
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:49 pm
Location: Berea, OH

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by Critical Thinker »

I think you have to say Bemidji and Lake State are the better teams now. Better head to heads, made it out of the first round. No way the WCHA makes 4 teams in. We're done.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by jpfalcon09 »

Critical Thinker wrote: Sun Mar 14, 2021 7:31 pm I think you have to say Bemidji and Lake State are the better teams now. Better head to heads, made it out of the first round. No way the WCHA makes 4 teams in. We're done.
This is correct.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by jpfalcon09 »

Falcons are 16th in both polls. I think BG are 50/50 at making the tournament if all chalk win their respective conference tournaments and if Bemidji beats Lake. Lots of things have to break the right way.

Teams to root to lose in my opinion:

Army/Canisius (prefer Canisius beats Army then loses to AIC)
Colgate/St. Lawrence
Denver
Lake Superior
UMass-Lowell
Niagara
Northern Michigan

Again it's a lot to ask for but at least gives us something to watch.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8380
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by mbenecke »

I think BG is right there on the edge of the bubble and if favorites win the conference tournaments, we’re going to be compared to teams like 10-13-1 Denver and 11-8-5 Providence for the last few spots.

It doesn’t feel like we deserve to be in based on how we played the last month of the season, but I don’t see how you can justify putting either in over us, with clearly inferior records. I think it’s crap to penalize us for staying healthy and playing more games.
BGSU '20
Critical Thinker
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 9:49 pm
Location: Berea, OH

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by Critical Thinker »

It'll be interesting to see what they make of the NCHC. NoDak, UMD, and SCSU all look like locks. According to Pairwise, the 4th best team is Denver, with a losing record of 10-13-1. After them is Omaha, with a winning record of 14-10-1. Denver also has the better head-to-head winning 3 of 5. It would be hard to argue Omaha should be in over Denver, but I don't think a team with a losing record should make it in at all.

And if we're still in consideration for our record, then the committee will have to take a good look at AIC (13-3-0) and the Army (15-5-1). Though, neither has an impressive win except against the other, and AIC was swept by Quinnipiac. Still, they can take care of teams beneath them when they need to, while we got clubbed by Northern in an elimination game.
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8380
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by mbenecke »

Critical Thinker wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:21 am It'll be interesting to see what they make of the NCHC. NoDak, UMD, and SCSU all look like locks. According to Pairwise, the 4th best team is Denver, with a losing record of 10-13-1. After them is Omaha, with a winning record of 14-10-1. Denver also has the better head-to-head winning 3 of 5. It would be hard to argue Omaha should be in over Denver, but I don't think a team with a losing record should make it in at all.

And if we're still in consideration for our record, then the committee will have to take a good look at AIC (13-3-0) and the Army (15-5-1). Though, neither has an impressive win except against the other, and AIC was swept by Quinnipiac. Still, they can take care of teams beneath them when they need to, while we got clubbed by Northern in an elimination game.
AHC - 1 (Army/AIC winner)
Big Ten - 3 (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan)
ECAC - 1 (Quinnipiac)
Hockey East - 3 (Boston College, UMass, Boston U)
NCHC - 3 (North Dakota, St. Cloud, Duluth)
WCHA - 2 (Minnesota State, Bemidji/LSSU winner)

Those feel like the locks.

So there are 3 spots for the following teams (with projected records based on losing, I guess):

BG 20-11-1
Bemidji 15-9-3/LSSU 17-7-3 loser
Omaha 14-10-1
Providence 11-9-5
Denver 10-13-1
UConn 10-11-2
Army 15-6-1/AIC 13-4-0 loser

I don’t see why we couldn’t still be in... I think we'd be behind Bemidji if they lost to LSSU, but beyond that, I don't see why we couldn't get in over 2 of the rest. Maybe one gets ahead of us, but I struggle to find 2 more worthy teams from that list. Of course, if something happens and we get weird conference champions, we're likely on the outside looking in. But I've found that the more I look at our resume (10 road wins, including a sweep of projected ECAC champ Quinnipiac, only the third or fourth team in the nation with 20 wins, etc.) the more I feel like we may still have at least a prayer.

I think Bemidji beating LSSU may keep the Lakers behind us in the pecking order, so that's what I'll be rooting hard for on Friday night. But I guess we'll see.
BGSU '20
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by jpfalcon09 »

mbenecke wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:31 am
Critical Thinker wrote: Tue Mar 16, 2021 7:21 am It'll be interesting to see what they make of the NCHC. NoDak, UMD, and SCSU all look like locks. According to Pairwise, the 4th best team is Denver, with a losing record of 10-13-1. After them is Omaha, with a winning record of 14-10-1. Denver also has the better head-to-head winning 3 of 5. It would be hard to argue Omaha should be in over Denver, but I don't think a team with a losing record should make it in at all.

And if we're still in consideration for our record, then the committee will have to take a good look at AIC (13-3-0) and the Army (15-5-1). Though, neither has an impressive win except against the other, and AIC was swept by Quinnipiac. Still, they can take care of teams beneath them when they need to, while we got clubbed by Northern in an elimination game.
AHC - 1 (Army/AIC winner)
Big Ten - 3 (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan)
ECAC - 1 (Quinnipiac)
Hockey East - 3 (Boston College, UMass, Boston U)
NCHC - 3 (North Dakota, St. Cloud, Duluth)
WCHA - 2 (Minnesota State, Bemidji/LSSU winner)

Those feel like the locks.

So there are 3 spots for the following teams (with projected records based on losing, I guess):

BG 20-11-1
Bemidji 15-9-3/LSSU 17-7-3 loser
Omaha 14-10-1
Providence 11-9-5
Denver 10-13-1
UConn 10-11-2
Army 15-6-1/AIC 13-4-0 loser

I don’t see why we couldn’t still be in... I think we'd be behind Bemidji if they lost to LSSU, but beyond that, I don't see why we couldn't get in over 2 of the rest. Maybe one gets ahead of us, but I struggle to find 2 more worthy teams from that list. Of course, if something happens and we get weird conference champions, we're likely on the outside looking in. But I've found that the more I look at our resume (10 road wins, including a sweep of projected ECAC champ Quinnipiac, only the third or fourth team in the nation with 20 wins, etc.) the more I feel like we may still have at least a prayer.

I think Bemidji beating LSSU may keep the Lakers behind us in the pecking order, so that's what I'll be rooting hard for on Friday night. But I guess we'll see.
Here's my breakdown:

Locks

No Dak
Wisconsin
Minnesota
Minnesota State
BC
UMass
Michigan
St. Cloud
AH winner (I'll say AIC)
ECAC winner (I'll say Quinnipiac)

Bubble but likely

UMD
Boston U

Win one more game and in

Bemidji
Providence

Bubble and needs help

Army/AIC if they lose AH tourney
BGSU
Lake Superior
Omaha
Notre Dame

Needs to win conf tournament

Canisius
Colgate
UMass-Lowell
Niagara
Northern Michigan

If the committee looks at records alone then BG has a case. They lose the H2H to Lake, and outside of beating Quinnipiac don't have any other statement wins. If the committee digs deeper, I think they're out compared to the likes of Omaha, and I can see potentially Atlantic Hockey getting a second bid if AIC and Army get to the final.

Long story short, BG likely cost themselves a bid by losing to NMU and it now comes down to a beauty pageant.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8477
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by jpfalcon09 »

Here's how my bracket looks up to this point. Subject to change with tournaments finishing up this week.

1 seeds - North Dakota, Minnesota, BC, Minnesota State
2 seeds - Wisconsin, UMass, St. Cloud, Michigan
3 seeds - UMD, BU, Quinnipiac, Omaha
4 seeds - Bemidji, Denver, Providence, AIC

Last four out - BGSU, Notre Dame, Lake Superior, Army
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8380
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by mbenecke »

Can I ask why you put 10-13-1 Denver and 11-9-5 Providence both in ahead of BG?

I guess I can understand one, but I disagree with both. I also think there's a chance the committee really looks at Denver and Omaha and chooses one or the other, not both. In a year like this, I don't think the NCHC deserves 5 bids, but maybe that's just me.
BGSU '20
User avatar
pdt1081
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 4903
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 11:09 am

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by pdt1081 »

Denver is done. There is no justification for them to be in under any circumstance.
Phi or Die
User avatar
mbenecke
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8380
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:48 pm
Location: Napoleon, OH
Contact:

Re: NCAA Tournament Watch

Post by mbenecke »

pdt1081 wrote: Thu Mar 18, 2021 10:46 am Denver is done. There is no justification for them to be in under any circumstance.
I tend to agree with this, but who do you then put in?
BGSU '20
Post Reply