The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Discussion of the Falcon football team.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by Schadenfreude »

Flipper wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:01 pm So...lets take WKU and another decent sized directional from KY, IN, IL or TN...shouldn't be too hard to find one
I'm not sure we need to settle for a directional or a throw in. Make the additions count. For me, making it count means a North Dakota State, Massachusetts, or Stony Brook. None are perfect, but Notre Dame isn't knocking on our door, either. All would move the needle in terms of academics, markets, or football more than "[insert directional here]."
TommyG wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:12 pm 4 million to play 3 football games a year on Tuesday night in front of 1000 people. Can’t imagine it would be all that appealing.
Conference USA is a dumpster fire. Western Kentucky is said to badly want in the MAC. As for Middle Tennessee: That's an interesting insight from JPFalcon09, that for Middle Tennessee this might come to whether or not they have boosters who can help pay Conference USA's $4 million exit fee.
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by MarkL »

Let me ask a couple questions to put some context to the potential MTSU move and see what everyone thinks.

1. If there were an opportunity to move BG to a better conference but we owed a $4 million exit fee to the MAC, would our donors be able to come up with that quickly?

2. Would you be willing to spend some athletic money to help offset the cost for MTSU to move? Ie the MAC fronts $1 million, or around $80k per full time member.


For me, it is maybe and no. The donors raised good money for BG baseball in a hurry, so it is plausible we would have the donor base for a move, but $4 million is a high bar. And no, not interested in paying to bring MTSU on as we already would be adding travel costs. Still want to see them join, they'd be a good addition, but not willing to help them out of their dead conference. I don't want to put that much of an investment in a new member which may may not show the kind of loyalty to the conference of the other full time members.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by MarkL »

BillyLP wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 9:28 pm
jpfalcon09 wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 pm
Flipper wrote: Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:01 pm So...lets take WKU and another decent sized directional from KY, IN, IL or TN...shouldn't be too hard to find one
MAC wants a 20-year commitment from WKU/MTSU. No way in hell they're going to offer a 20-year anything to a school who competes at the FCS level in football within the region.
Is that a pretty standard ask? 20 years feels like a lifetime in college athletics. I would have thought 10 years would be the standard.
20 years ago ...
- Urban Meyer was coaching at BG
- Nick Saban was just getting started at LSU
- Marshall was in the MAC and UCF was about to join
- Michigan was fat and happy enjoying their annual wins over Ohio State
- Kirk Ferentz was coaching at Iowa
- the SEC was just a bunch of rednecks in the south while the Big Ten was the dominant conference
- MarkL was a massive nerd
- the Big 12 was an awesome conference including national power in Nebraska and Colorado
- Toledo sucked
- the Big East was alive and well with Miami, along with powerful programs in Syracuse, West Virginia, Pitt, and Virginia Tech

Yeah ... lifetime feels right. Some things just don't change though.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by Schadenfreude »

MarkL wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:50 pm Let me ask a couple questions to put some context to the potential MTSU move and see what everyone thinks.

1. If there were an opportunity to move BG to a better conference but we owed a $4 million exit fee to the MAC, would our donors be able to come up with that quickly?

2. Would you be willing to spend some athletic money to help offset the cost for MTSU to move? Ie the MAC fronts $1 million, or around $80k per full time member.


For me, it is maybe and no. The donors raised good money for BG baseball in a hurry, so it is plausible we would have the donor base for a move, but $4 million is a high bar. And no, not interested in paying to bring MTSU on as we already would be adding travel costs. Still want to see them join, they'd be a good addition, but not willing to help them out of their dead conference. I don't want to put that much of an investment in a new member which may may not show the kind of loyalty to the conference of the other full time members.
Good points. I could be wrong, but my sense is sometimes the new conference is so much lucrative that the new revenue can pay off the exit fee. In this situation, while our TV deal may be a bit better, $4 million is still a lot of money.

The MAC will be fine now matter how this works out.
User avatar
Flipper
The Global Village Idiot
The Global Village Idiot
Posts: 18348
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 5:01 am
Location: Ida Twp, MI

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by Flipper »

The MAC has been burned by schools outside of our traditional footprint moving in short term...nobody likes to be used like that, it diminishes the brand. That said..20 years seems like a really long time in today's environment. Maybe go for 10?
It's not the fall that hurts...it's when you hit the ground.
Tony4BG
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 884
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:55 pm

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by Tony4BG »

MTSU staying in CUSA
Tony4BG
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 884
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 6:55 pm

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by Tony4BG »

Lost count if CUSA needs to another FCS school or not to put this year realignment to bed..
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by jpfalcon09 »

MTSU is broke and can't afford to leave, plain and simple.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
Schadenfreude
Professional tractor puller
Professional tractor puller
Posts: 6983
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Colorado

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by Schadenfreude »

It's official. Middle Tennessee is going to stick with Conference USA.

https://mtsu.edu/president/post/1724/st ... ffiliation
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by jpfalcon09 »

Schadenfreude wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:40 pm It's official. Middle Tennessee is going to stick with Conference USA.

https://mtsu.edu/president/post/1724/st ... ffiliation
MTSU AD cites fans' wishes to remain aligned with more southernly schools, the addition of Liberty and NMSU (lol okay), and recruiting concerns.

Fact is they're hurting for money and inheriting a chunk of the buyout fees from the other schools can solve some of their problems.

Now we'll see what WKU decides...
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by MarkL »

jpfalcon09 wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:59 pm
Schadenfreude wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:40 pm It's official. Middle Tennessee is going to stick with Conference USA.

https://mtsu.edu/president/post/1724/st ... ffiliation
MTSU AD cites fans' wishes to remain aligned with more southernly schools, the addition of Liberty and NMSU (lol okay), and recruiting concerns.

Fact is they're hurting for money and inheriting a chunk of the buyout fees from the other schools can solve some of their problems.

Now we'll see what WKU decides...
If I'm WKU I beg and plead the MAC to look at EKU, Illinois State, or another good FCS program. But don't count me interested. Let Corpse-USA be the place for FCS programs greedy to chase some dollars. We are better than that.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.
User avatar
BillyLP
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 3157
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:57 am
Location: Chicago

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by BillyLP »

jpfalcon09 wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:59 pm
Schadenfreude wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:40 pm It's official. Middle Tennessee is going to stick with Conference USA.

https://mtsu.edu/president/post/1724/st ... ffiliation
MTSU AD cites fans' wishes to remain aligned with more southernly schools, the addition of Liberty and NMSU (lol okay), and recruiting concerns.

Fact is they're hurting for money and inheriting a chunk of the buyout fees from the other schools can solve some of their problems.

Now we'll see what WKU decides...
If they're hurting to come up with an amount to get out of a dead conference, then I have to question the fact that they are in the midst of a $66 million facilities upgrade.
BG '10

Attended more games than any responsible student should have.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by jpfalcon09 »

BillyLP wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 4:08 pm
jpfalcon09 wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:59 pm
Schadenfreude wrote: Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:40 pm It's official. Middle Tennessee is going to stick with Conference USA.

https://mtsu.edu/president/post/1724/st ... ffiliation
MTSU AD cites fans' wishes to remain aligned with more southernly schools, the addition of Liberty and NMSU (lol okay), and recruiting concerns.

Fact is they're hurting for money and inheriting a chunk of the buyout fees from the other schools can solve some of their problems.

Now we'll see what WKU decides...
If they're hurting to come up with an amount to get out of a dead conference, then I have to question the fact that they are in the midst of a $66 million facilities upgrade.
A lot of big time donor money went towards that project. Good luck asking for those same people to then pony up again for a change in conference affiliation. I think the MAC dodged a bullet here given their financial situation.

CUSA is set to make $18 million in buyout fees which will be evenly distributed amongst the remaining members, which if WKU stays is $3.6 million per school. MTSU sees that as a way out of their current mess.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
jpfalcon09
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 8608
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:32 pm
Location: Detroit Beach, MI

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by jpfalcon09 »

Pete Thamel says WKU still has strong interest in joining the MAC so it's essentially up to the conference now.
The longer the walk, the farther you crawl.
User avatar
MarkL
Peregrine
Peregrine
Posts: 5558
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:23 pm
Location: Greater Washington DC area

Re: The final Great Realignment of College Football?

Post by MarkL »

Serious question. If WKU is all sports in, how does everyone feel about going back to unbalanced divisions? It's not desirable, but we had a 6 team west division and 7 team east for 9 years and we made it. Put WKU in the west, then the MAC is 13 full members. For now, keeping the door open for someone else dedicated to join full time.
MarkL has spoken.
You may all now return to your daily lives.